Literature DB >> 24531445

Interference with pre-B-cell receptor signaling offers a therapeutic option for TCF3-rearranged childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

A van der Veer1, V H J van der Velden2, M E Willemse1, P G Hoogeveen2, E F Petricoin3, H B Beverloo4, G Escherich5, M A Horstmann5, R Pieters6, M L den Boer6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24531445      PMCID: PMC3944663          DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Rearrangements of TCF3 (E2A) occur in <5% of childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) cases.[1] In 90–95% of these rearranged cases, TCF3 (chromosome 19p13) is fused to PBX1 (chromosome 1q23).[2] This TCF3-rearranged subtype is characterized by the expression of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin heavy chain (CyIgμ) in more than 80% of pediatric patients.[3, 4] This CyIgμ positivity is a consequence of an in-frame VDJ rearrangement of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IGH).[3] Igμ and the surrogate light chain together constitute the pre-B-cell receptor (pre-BCR).[5] Activation of this pre-BCR triggers the clonal expansion of pre-B cells in the bone marrow, after which these cells further maturate by initiating the rearrangement of the light chain locus genes IGK and IGL.[6] The transcription factor TCF3 is essential in the differentiation process of common lymphoid progenitors into B-lineage cells and is a key regulator of further B-cell development. TCF3-deficient cells are impaired in rearranging both the immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes, and wild-type TCF3 regulates the expression of genes important in B-cell differentiation such as EBF1 and PAX5.[7, 8] These findings imply that TCF3-rearranged cases might be affected in pre-BCR-mediated signaling, which in turn could point to new therapeutic targets for this subtype of BCP-ALL. To address this hypothesis, we investigated components of the pre-BCR pathway in leukemic cells obtained from newly diagnosed children with TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL and non-TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL. In a representative childhood BCP-ALL cohort, 11/13 (84.6%) of TCF3-rearranged cases were positive for CyIgμ compared with 68/325 (20.9%) of non-TCF3-rearranged cases (P<0.001; Figure 1a), thereby confirming previous studies.[3, 4] We used a previously validated PCR heteroduplex analysis[9] of V(D)J rearrangement patterns of the IGH, IGK and IGL genes to determine a difference in the heavy and light chain rearrangement patterns of TCF3 and non-TCF3-rearranged cases. Four stages at which the rearrangement had been arrested were defined: samples with only rearrangements of IGH (IGH), samples with Vκ-Jκ rearrangements but no IGK-Kde or Vλ-Jλ rearrangements IGK), samples with IGK-Kde and no Vλ-Jλ rearrangements IGK-Kde), and samples with Vλ-Jλ rearrangements (IGL). Strikingly, the immunoglobulin rearrangement pattern of TCF3-rearranged cases was arrested at the IGH stage in 86.4% (19/22) of the cases. Only one case was assigned to the IGK group and two cases to the IGL group. In contrast, only 17.9% (34/190) of the non-TCF3-rearranged cases was arrested at the IGH stage and the frequency of cases with light chain rearrangements was significantly increased to 18.4% (35/190) for samples arrested at IGK, 38.4% (73/190) for IGK-Kde and 24.7% (47/190) for IGL (P<0.001). In one sample, that was representing a BCR-ABL1-like patient, rearrangements of the heavy chain (IGH) and light chain genes (IGK, IGL) did not occur (Figure 1b). These data demonstrate that the majority of TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL cases express the immunoglobulin heavy chain without further initiating the rearrangement and expression of the light chain needed to mature further and form a functional B-cell receptor. This suggests a divergent role for the pre-BCR and its downstream signaling in TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL.
Figure 1

Cytoplasmic Igμ expression in TCF3 non-TCF3-rearranged B-cell precursor ALL (a). Patients were considered CyIgμ positive if >30% of leukemic cells were stained positively for this marker as detected by flow cytometry. Distribution of immunoglobulin rearrangement pattern of TCF3-rearranged and non-TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL cases (b). IGH group contains samples with IGH rearrangement only. IGK group consists of cases with Vκ-Jκ rearrangements without IGK-Kde or Vλ-Jλ IGK-Kde group contains IGK-deleted cases without Vλ-Jλ rearrangements. IGL group contains cases with Vλ-Jλ-rearranged IGL locus. V(D)J rearrangement patterns were detected by genomic PCR heteroduplex analysis as previously decribed.[9] Expression level of proteins involved in pre-BCR signaling in TCF3-rearranged and non-TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL samples (c). Expression levels of indicated proteins were determined by reverse phase protein arrays using leukemic cell lysates of newly diagnosed BCP-ALL patients. The protein level was detected in six spots per patient by specific antibodies and was normalized for total protein loaded on each array. Red line indicates the median expression level per group. ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05 (a and b: χ2-test; c: Mann–Whitney U-test). See Supplementary Materials and methods document for more information.

Next, we analyzed the expression levels of several key components of the pre-BCR signaling complex: ZAP70, SYK, LYN, SLP65 (BLNK), BTK, PLCγ2, PI3K-p110δ, and IRF4 by reverse phase protein arrays[10] of leukemic cell lysates (containing >90% leukemic blasts) obtained from 19 TCF3-rearranged and 113 non-TCF3 BCP-ALL pediatric patients. As visualized in Figure 1c, most of these proteins were expressed significantly more in TCF3-rearranged compared with non-TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL: ZAP70 1.3-fold (P<0.001), SLP65 3.4-fold (P=0.002), BTK 1.5-fold (P<0.001), PI3K-p110δ 1.2-fold (P=0.02) and IRF4 5.2-fold (P<0.001). In addition, the expression of the TCF3-target gene EBF1 was 2.7-fold increased in TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL cases (P<0.001; Figure 1c). The activity of this divergent pre-BCR pathway was evaluated by responsiveness to the BTK inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765, Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA). Ibrutinib was demonstrated to be of clinical benefit to patients suffering from chronic lymphoblastic leukemia,[11, 12] B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas[11] and multiple myeloma.[13] We tested in primary BCP-ALL samples and leukemic cell lines in a 72-h in vitro drug cytotoxicity assay using methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium conversion as read-out.[14] In correspondence with preclinical studies showing effective anti-leukemic effect of Ibrutinib in primary chronic lymphoblastic leukemia cells,[15] a concentration range between 0 and 50 μM Ibrutinib was used. In our study the growth and viability of the TCF3-rearanged cell line MHH-CALL3 decreased upon exposure to increasing concentrations of Ibrutinib (Figure 2a), resulting in a growth inhibitory concentration (GI50) of 43.5 μM. In contrast, no GI50 value was reached for non-TCF3-rearranged cell lines (Nalm6 and MHH-CALL4) nor the TCF3-rearranged cell line 697 (Figure 2a). This latter cell line is known for its lack of functional BTK,[16, 17] suggesting relative specificity of Ibrutinib for BTK-mediated pre-BCR signaling in BCP-ALL. In correspondence, the level of phosphorylated ERK1/2, which is an important downstream effector of BTK contributing to cell survival, decreased upon a 4-h exposure to Ibrutinib in the TCF3-rearranged MHH-CALL3 but not in both non-TCF3-rearranged cell lines Nalm6 and MHH-CALL4 (as shown on western blot, Figure 2c). Figure 2b shows the differential cytotoxic effect of Ibrutinib in primary patients' leukemic cells of six TCF3-rearranged and six non-TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL patients (>90% leukemic blasts) taken at the initial diagnosis (measured by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay). All TCF3-rearranged samples expressed CyIgμ in contrast to 50% (3/6) non-TCF3 samples, which represented two hyperdiploid (>50 chromosomes), two ETV6-RUNX1-translocated, one BCR-ABL1-like and one BCR-ABL1-positive case. Ibrutinib significantly reduced the cell viability of all TCF3-rearranged cases at each inhibitor concentration compared with non-TCF3-rearranged cases (P<0.001). As leukemic cells of patients do not proliferate in ex vivo culture conditions, the concentration of Ibrutinib, which is lethal to 50% (LC50) of the primary leukemic cells, was calculated. The median LC50 value was 16.7 μM for TCF3-rearranged cases, whereas virtually no cell death was induced up to 50.0 μM of Ibrutinib in leukemic samples of non-TCF3-rearranged patients (P<0.001; Figure 2b). Strikingly, in our study the leukemic cell samples of patients were more sensitive to cell death induced by Ibrutinib than the growth inhibitory concentration needed for cell lines. This suggests that TCF3-rearranged patients' leukemic cells have an activated pre-BCR signaling pathway. The observed LC50 values for TCF3-rearranged cells are comparable to previously reported drug cytotoxicity data in primary chronic lymphoblastic leukemia cells.[15] In addition, Ibrutinib was shown to impair the migration and adhesion of mature B cells to mesenchymal stromal cells at sub-micromolar levels.[18, 19] Taken together, these studies suggest that Ibrutinib is highly effective to target leukemic cells by interfering with (pre)BCR-driven survival/proliferation signaling and with migration/adhesion pathways.
Figure 2

Sensitivity of leukemic cells to the BTK inhibitor Ibrutinib. (a) Leukemic cell lines. (b) Patients' leukemic cells. Experiments were performed in duplicate. Dashed line indicates the Ibrutinib concentration affecting growth (GI50, cell lines) or inducing cell death (LC50, patients'cells) in 50% of the cells. Bars indicate 95% confidence interval. P-value was calculated by one-way analysis of variance test with repeated measurements. Effect of Ibrutinib on ERK protein levels in leukemic cell lines (c). Cell lines were exposed to 0, 50 and 150 μM Ibrutinib for 4 h. The level of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) was reduced in TCF3-rearranged MHH-CALL3 compared with non-TCF3-rearranged Nalm6 and MHH-CALL4 cell lines. β-Actin served as a loading control. P-ERK/β-actin: ratio of the intensities. See Supplementary Materials and methods document for more information.

Remarkably, we observed that TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL cases intrinsically express higher protein levels of pre-BCR pathway including IRF4 (Figure 1c). In normal B-cell development, IRF4 triggers the rearrangement of the immunoglobulin light chain genes IGK and IGL, thereby contributing to the maturation of the B-cell receptor,[20] whereas the present study shows that these light chain genes are infrequently rearranged in TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL. Inhibition of TCF3 is essential for the successful production of high-affinity immunoglobulins, a process that is mediated via a negative-feedback loop of the mature B-cell receptor.[21] Given the presently available data, we would like to postulate that the differentiation of TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL is arrested at an early stage in B-cell development, most likely resembling the compartment of pre-B-II-large cells in normal hematopoiesis before IRF4 triggers the rearrangements of immunoglobulin light chains.[20] The aberrantly high levels of IRF4 together with activated pre-BCR signaling may trigger an uncontrolled expansion of TCF3-rearranged cells in vivo at the expense of differentiation into more mature B cells. In correspondence, the relative sensitivity of TCF3-rearranged leukemic cells for Ibrutinib—without need for external stimuli other than those provided by the culture medium—and the aberrant expression profile of pre-BCR-related proteins suggests that the pre-BCR pathway is more activated in TCF3-rearranged compared with non-TCF3-rearranged leukemic cells. The prognosis of children with TCF3-rearranged leukemia has improved during consecutive trials by optimizing the regimens with traditional chemotherapeutic drugs.[22] Implementation of more specific, that is, targeted, drugs may further improve prognosis and/or reduce the side effects of current chemotherapeutics by allowing a dosage reduction. Early clinical trials show that objective response rates can be obtained with Ibrutinib in 60–75% of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.[11, 23] A phase II study in adult patients with chronic lymphoid leukemia indicates that monotherapy with Ibrutinib might be effective even in high-risk cases with limited adverse effects.[23] These early clinical trial observations together with the findings presented in this preclinical study provide a strong rationale to design studies with agents interfering with pre-BCR signaling (for example, Ibrutinib) in children with TCF3-rearranged BCP-ALL.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of B-cell proliferation and differentiation by pre-B-cell receptor signalling.

Authors:  Sebastian Herzog; Michael Reth; Hassan Jumaa
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Instructive role of the transcription factor E2A in early B lymphopoiesis and germinal center B cell development.

Authors:  Kyongrim Kwon; Caroline Hutter; Qiong Sun; Ivan Bilic; César Cobaleda; Stephen Malin; Meinrad Busslinger
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  Negative feedback regulation of antigen receptors through calmodulin inhibition of E2A.

Authors:  Jiyoti Verma-Gaur; Jannek Hauser; Thomas Grundström
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; William L Carroll; Soheil Meshinchi; Robert J Arceci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 thwarts chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell survival and tissue homing in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Sabine Ponader; Shih-Shih Chen; Joseph J Buggy; Kumudha Balakrishnan; Varsha Gandhi; William G Wierda; Michael J Keating; Susan O'Brien; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Jan A Burger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of TCF3 (E2A)/19p13.3 rearrangements in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Kerry E Barber; Christine J Harrison; Zoe J Broadfield; Adam R M Stewart; Sarah L Wright; Mary Martineau; Jon C Strefford; Anthony V Moorman
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  MRD detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients using Ig/TCR gene rearrangements as targets for real-time quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Vincent H J van der Velden; Jacques J M van Dongen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

8.  Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) has significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies.

Authors:  Ranjana H Advani; Joseph J Buggy; Jeff P Sharman; Sonali M Smith; Thomas E Boyd; Barbara Grant; Kathryn S Kolibaba; Richard R Furman; Sara Rodriguez; Betty Y Chang; Juthamas Sukbuntherng; Raquel Izumi; Ahmed Hamdy; Eric Hedrick; Nathan H Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Egress of CD19(+)CD5(+) cells into peripheral blood following treatment with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Betty Y Chang; Michelle Francesco; Martin F M De Rooij; Padmaja Magadala; Susanne M Steggerda; Min Mei Huang; Annemieke Kuil; Sarah E M Herman; Stella Chang; Steven T Pals; Wyndham Wilson; Adrian Wiestner; Marcel Spaargaren; Joseph J Buggy; Laurence Elias
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  John C Byrd; Richard R Furman; Steven E Coutre; Ian W Flinn; Jan A Burger; Kristie A Blum; Barbara Grant; Jeff P Sharman; Morton Coleman; William G Wierda; Jeffrey A Jones; Weiqiang Zhao; Nyla A Heerema; Amy J Johnson; Juthamas Sukbuntherng; Betty Y Chang; Fong Clow; Eric Hedrick; Joseph J Buggy; Danelle F James; Susan O'Brien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for targeting the pre-B-cell receptor signaling pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Markus Müschen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Ibrutinib inhibits pre-BCR+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression by targeting BTK and BLK.

Authors:  Ekaterina Kim; Christian Hurtz; Stefan Koehrer; Zhiqiang Wang; Sriram Balasubramanian; Betty Y Chang; Markus Müschen; R Eric Davis; Jan A Burger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Targeting the B-cell receptor signaling pathway in B lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Maike Buchner; Markus Müschen
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.284

4.  Pre-BCR signaling in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia regulates PI3K/AKT, FOXO1 and MYC, and can be targeted by SYK inhibition.

Authors:  S Köhrer; O Havranek; F Seyfried; C Hurtz; G P Coffey; E Kim; E Ten Hacken; U Jäger; K Vanura; S O'Brien; D A Thomas; H Kantarjian; D Ghosh; Z Wang; M Zhang; W Ma; H Jumaa; K-M Debatin; M Müschen; L H Meyer; R E Davis; J A Burger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  The pre-B-cell receptor checkpoint in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J Eswaran; P Sinclair; O Heidenreich; J Irving; L J Russell; A Hall; D P Calado; C J Harrison; J Vormoor
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Ibrutinib is not an effective drug in primografts of TCF3-PBX1.

Authors:  Cesca van de Ven; Aurélie Boeree; Femke Stalpers; C Michel Zwaan; Monique L Den Boer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Combinatorial efficacy of entospletinib and chemotherapy in patient-derived xenograft models of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Joseph P Loftus; Anella Yahiaoui; Patrick A Brown; Lisa M Niswander; Asen Bagashev; Min Wang; Allyson Schauf; Stacey Tannheimer; Sarah K Tasian
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.941

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.