PURPOSE: To confirm the prognostic value of a drug resistance profile combining prednisolone, vincristine, and l-asparaginase (PVA) cytotoxicity in an independent group of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with a different protocol and analyzed at longer follow-up compared with our previous study of patients treated according to the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG) ALL VII/VIII protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Drug resistance profiles were determined in 202 children (aged 1 to 18 years) with newly diagnosed ALL who were treated according to the German Cooperative Study Group for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (COALL)-92 protocol. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 4.1 to 9.3 years), the 5-year disease-free survival probability (pDFS) rate +/- SE was 69% +/- 7.0%, 83% +/- 4.4%, and 84% +/- 6.8% for patients with resistant (PVA score 7 to 9), intermediate-sensitive (PVA score 5 to 6), and sensitive (SPVA score 3 to 4) profiles, respectively (sensitive and intermediate-sensitive v resistant, P </=.05). Resistant patients were at increased risk of an early event (nonresponse or relapse within 2.5 years of diagnosis) compared with sensitive and intermediate-sensitive patients (P =.03). The profile did not identify patients at higher risk of late relapse, which was also observed for DCLSG ALL-VII/VIII patients now analyzed at a median of 7.5 years of follow-up (range, 4.4 to 10.8 years). Despite being nondiscriminative for late relapses, the resistant profile was still the strongest prognostic factor for COALL-92 patients in a multivariate analysis including known risk factors (P =.07). CONCLUSION: Drug resistance profiles identify patients at higher risk of early treatment failures and may, therefore, be used to improve risk-group stratification of children with ALL.
PURPOSE: To confirm the prognostic value of a drug resistance profile combining prednisolone, vincristine, and l-asparaginase (PVA) cytotoxicity in an independent group of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with a different protocol and analyzed at longer follow-up compared with our previous study of patients treated according to the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG) ALL VII/VIII protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Drug resistance profiles were determined in 202 children (aged 1 to 18 years) with newly diagnosed ALL who were treated according to the German Cooperative Study Group for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (COALL)-92 protocol. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 4.1 to 9.3 years), the 5-year disease-free survival probability (pDFS) rate +/- SE was 69% +/- 7.0%, 83% +/- 4.4%, and 84% +/- 6.8% for patients with resistant (PVA score 7 to 9), intermediate-sensitive (PVA score 5 to 6), and sensitive (SPVA score 3 to 4) profiles, respectively (sensitive and intermediate-sensitive v resistant, P </=.05). Resistant patients were at increased risk of an early event (nonresponse or relapse within 2.5 years of diagnosis) compared with sensitive and intermediate-sensitive patients (P =.03). The profile did not identify patients at higher risk of late relapse, which was also observed for DCLSG ALL-VII/VIIIpatients now analyzed at a median of 7.5 years of follow-up (range, 4.4 to 10.8 years). Despite being nondiscriminative for late relapses, the resistant profile was still the strongest prognostic factor for COALL-92 patients in a multivariate analysis including known risk factors (P =.07). CONCLUSION: Drug resistance profiles identify patients at higher risk of early treatment failures and may, therefore, be used to improve risk-group stratification of children with ALL.
Authors: Franziska Schramm; Udo Zur Stadt; Martin Zimmermann; Norbert Jorch; Arnulf Pekrun; Arndt Borkhardt; Thomas Imschweiler; Holger Christiansen; Jörg Faber; Irene Schmid; Tobias Feuchtinger; Gerhard Beron; Monique L den Boer; Rob Pieters; Martin A Horstmann; Gritta E Janka-Schaub; Gabriele Escherich Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-11-26
Authors: Jan Styczynski; Mariusz Wysocki; Robert Debski; Krzysztof Czyzewski; Beata Kolodziej; Beata Rafinska; Malgorzata Kubicka; Sylwia Koltan; Andrzej Koltan; Monika Pogorzala; Andrzej Kurylak; Dorota Olszewska-Slonina; Walentyna Balwierz; Edyta Juraszewska; Maria Wieczorek; Igor Olejnik; Maryna Krawczuk-Rybak; Marta Kuzmicz; Jerzy Kowalczyk; Jolanta Stefaniak; Wanda Badowska; Danuta Sonta-Jakimczyk; Tomasz Szczepanski; Michal Matysiak; Iwona Malinowska; Elzbieta Stanczak; Jacek Wachowiak; Benigna Konatkowska; Lidia Gil; Anna Balcerska; Lucyna Maciejka-Kapuscinska Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Brian V Balgobind; Marry M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Renee X De Menezes; Dirk Reinhardt; Iris H I M Hollink; Susan T J C M Arentsen-Peters; Elisabeth R van Wering; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Jacqueline Cloos; Evelien S J M de Bont; Jean-Michel Cayuela; Andre Baruchel; Claus Meyer; Rolf Marschalek; Jan Trka; Jan Stary; H Berna Beverloo; Rob Pieters; C Michel Zwaan; Monique L den Boer Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Lidewij T Warris; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Ingrid M Ariës; Rob Pieters; Erica L T van den Akker; Monique L den Boer Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: M Kourti; N Vavatsi; N Gombakis; V Sidi; G Tzimagiorgis; T Papageorgiou; D Koliouskas; F Athanassiadou Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 2.490