Literature DB >> 24530696

Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.

Fatih Sendag1, Ali Akdemir2, Burak Zeybek2, Asuman Ozdemir3, Ilkben Gunusen3, Mehmet Kemal Oztekin2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic single-site total hysterectomy and to compare the outcomes of newly implemented robotic single-site bipolar and external vessel-sealing device.
DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with benign indications for hysterectomy.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent robotic-assisted single-incision transumbilical total hysterectomy using the novel da Vinci Single-Site Platform. Vaginal cuff closures were performed intracorporeally using the same technique in all cases.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 49.5 years (range, 40-61), and body mass index was 28.5 (range, 21-34). Blood loss was 22.5 mL (range, 7-120 mL). Docking time was 5.5 minutes (range, 3-10 minutes), console time was 74.5 minutes (range, 60-160 minutes), vaginal cuff closure time was 25 minutes (range, 16-41 minutes), and total operative time was 98.5 minutes (range, 71-183 minutes). When 2 groups were created according to the energy devices used during the procedures, console time in the newly implemented bipolar group was shorter than in the external sealing device group (69.5 minutes vs. 77 minutes; p = .03); however, no differences were found for uterus removal time (50.5 minutes vs. 53.5 minutes; p = .13). Differences were observed in vaginal cuff closure time (18.5 minutes vs 23 minutes; p = .01).
CONCLUSION: Robotic single-site total hysterectomy using a newly implemented bipolar grasping instrument and even with intracorporeal cuff closure is a safe and feasible procedure in appropriately selected patients. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracorporeal Suturing; Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Total hysterectomy; da Vinci Single-Site Platform

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24530696     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  18 in total

1.  Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Cianci; A Rosati; V Rumolo; S Gueli Alletti; V Gallotta; L C Turco; G Corrado; G Vizzielli; A Fagotti; F Fanfani; G Scambia; S Uccella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Single site robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension (SS R-ALS) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: first case reported.

Authors:  Andrea Giannini; Eleonora Russo; Paolo Mannella; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-12-17

3.  Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial.

Authors:  Seungho Lee; Jin Kyong Kim; Youn Nam Kim; Dong-Su Jang; Yoo Min Kim; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  New suturing technique for robotic-assisted vaginal cuff closure during single-site hysterectomy.

Authors:  So-Jin Shin; Hyewon Chung; Sang-Hoon Kwon; Soon-Do Cha; Chi-Heum Cho
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 5.  Future of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Whealon; Alessio Vinci; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 6.  Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 7.  The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulia Armano; Andrea Rosati; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

8.  Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy.

Authors:  Gaby N Moawad; Paul Tyan; Jiheum Paek; Erryn E Tappy; Daniel Park; Souzanna Choussein; Serene S Srouji; Antonio Gargiulo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-21

9.  Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: Advantages and limits.

Authors:  Nicola Pluchino; Nicolas C Buchs; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Jean Marie Wenger; Philippe Morel; Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-29

10.  Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Jung-Dong Lee; Tae Wook Kong; Suk-Joon Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.