| Literature DB >> 24530633 |
Ben Forbes1, Raegan O'Lone2, Philippa Pribul Allen3, Anthony Cahn3, Chris Clarke4, Mark Collinge5, Lea Ann Dailey6, Louise E Donnelly7, Joseph Dybowski5, David Hassall3, Deon Hildebrand3, Rhys Jones5, Joanne Kilgour8, Jan Klapwijk3, Curtis C Maier9, Tim McGovern10, Kristen Nikula11, Joel D Parry3, Matthew D Reed12, Ian Robinson13, Lindsay Tomlinson5, Alison Wolfreys14.
Abstract
Alveolar macrophage (AM) responses are commonly induced in inhalation toxicology studies, typically being observed as an increase in number or a vacuolated 'foamy' morphology. Discriminating between adaptive AM responses and adverse events during nonclinical and clinical development is a major scientific challenge. When measuring and interpreting induced AM responses, an understanding of macrophage biology is essential; this includes 'sub-types' of AMs with different roles in health and disease and mechanisms of induction/resolution of AM responses to inhalation of pharmaceutical aerosols. In this context, emerging assay techniques, the utility of toxicokinetics and the requirement for new biomarkers are considered. Risk assessment for nonclinical toxicology findings and their translation to effects in humans is discussed from a scientific and regulatory perspective. At present, when apparently adaptive macrophage-only responses to inhaled investigational products are observed in nonclinical studies, this poses a challenge for risk assessment and an improved understanding of induced AM responses to inhaled pharmaceuticals is required.Entities:
Keywords: Drug delivery; Inhalation; Nonclinical; Regulatory toxicology; Respiratory; Safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24530633 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev ISSN: 0169-409X Impact factor: 15.470