Literature DB >> 24529948

Clinical validation of an algorithm for rapid and accurate automated segmentation of intracoronary optical coherence tomography images.

Yiannis S Chatzizisis1, Vassilis G Koutkias2, Konstantinos Toutouzas3, Andreas Giannopoulos4, Ioanna Chouvarda2, Maria Riga3, Antonios P Antoniadis4, Grigorios Cheimariotis2, Charalampos Doulaverakis5, Ioannis Tsampoulatidis5, Konstantina Bouki6, Ioannis Kompatsiaris5, Christodoulos Stefanadis3, Nicos Maglaveras2, George D Giannoglou4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) images is based on manual identification of the lumen contours and relevant structures. However, manual image segmentation is a cumbersome and time-consuming process, subject to significant intra- and inter-observer variability. This study aims to present and validate a fully-automated method for segmentation of intracoronary OCT images.
METHODS: We studied 20 coronary arteries (mean length=39.7±10.0 mm) from 20 patients who underwent a clinically-indicated cardiac catheterization. The OCT images (n=1812) were segmented manually, as well as with a fully-automated approach. A semi-automated variation of the fully-automated algorithm was also applied. Using certain lumen size and lumen shape characteristics, the fully- and semi-automated segmentation algorithms were validated over manual segmentation, which was considered as the gold standard.
RESULTS: Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that both the fully-automated and semi-automated segmentation had a very high agreement with the manual segmentation, with the semi-automated approach being slightly more accurate than the fully-automated method. The fully-automated and semi-automated OCT segmentation reduced the analysis time by more than 97% and 86%, respectively, compared to manual segmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current work we validated a fully-automated OCT segmentation algorithm, as well as a semi-automated variation of it in an extensive "real-life" dataset of OCT images. The study showed that our algorithm can perform rapid and reliable segmentation of OCT images.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image processing; Image segmentation; Method comparison study; Optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529948     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  5 in total

1.  Automated segmentation and quantification of airway mucus with endobronchial optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  David C Adams; Hamid Pahlevaninezhad; Margit V Szabari; Josalyn L Cho; Daniel L Hamilos; Mehmet Kesimer; Richard C Boucher; Andrew D Luster; Benjamin D Medoff; Melissa J Suter
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Computer Vision Techniques for Transcatheter Intervention.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Xianghua Xie; Matthew Roach
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  Reconstruction of stented coronary arteries from optical coherence tomography images: Feasibility, validation, and repeatability of a segmentation method.

Authors:  Claudio Chiastra; Eros Montin; Marco Bologna; Susanna Migliori; Cristina Aurigemma; Francesco Burzotta; Simona Celi; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca; Luca Mainardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Stented Coronary Arteries Reconstructed from Optical Coherence Tomography: Towards a Widespread Clinical Use of Fluid Dynamics Analyses.

Authors:  Claudio Chiastra; Susanna Migliori; Francesco Burzotta; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Automatic segmentation of optical coherence tomography pullbacks of coronary arteries treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Application to hemodynamics modeling.

Authors:  Marco Bologna; Susanna Migliori; Eros Montin; Rajiv Rampat; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca; Luca Mainardi; Claudio Chiastra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.