Ramona Backhaus1, Hilde Verbeek2, Erik van Rossum3, Elizabeth Capezuti4, Jan P H Hamers2. 1. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.backhaus@maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Research Centre on Autonomy and Participation, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 4. Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care (QoC) in nursing homes continues to receive major attention. The evidence supporting this relationship, however, is weak because most studies employ a cross-sectional design. This review summarizes the findings from recent longitudinal studies. METHODS: In April 2013, the databases PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched. Studies were eligible if they (1) examined the relationship between nurse staffing and QoC outcomes, (2) included only nursing home data, (3) were original research articles describing quantitative, longitudinal studies, and (4) were written in English, Dutch, or German. The methodological quality of 20 studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, excluding 2 low-quality articles for the analysis. RESULTS: No consistent relationship was found between nurse staffing and QoC. Higher staffing levels were associated with better as well as lower QoC indicators. For example, for restraint use both positive (ie, less restraint use) and negative outcomes (ie, more restraint use) were found. With regard to pressure ulcers, we found that more staff led to fewer pressure ulcers and, therefore, better results, no matter who (registered nurse, licensed practical nurse/ licensed vocational nurse, or nurse assistant) delivered care. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent evidence was found for a positive relationship between staffing and QoC. Although some positive indications were suggested, major methodological and theoretical weaknesses (eg, timing of data collection, assumed linear relationship between staffing and QoC) limit interpretation of results. Our findings demonstrate the necessity for well-designed longitudinal studies to gain a better insight into the relationship between nurse staffing and QoC in nursing homes.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care (QoC) in nursing homes continues to receive major attention. The evidence supporting this relationship, however, is weak because most studies employ a cross-sectional design. This review summarizes the findings from recent longitudinal studies. METHODS: In April 2013, the databases PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched. Studies were eligible if they (1) examined the relationship between nurse staffing and QoC outcomes, (2) included only nursing home data, (3) were original research articles describing quantitative, longitudinal studies, and (4) were written in English, Dutch, or German. The methodological quality of 20 studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, excluding 2 low-quality articles for the analysis. RESULTS: No consistent relationship was found between nurse staffing and QoC. Higher staffing levels were associated with better as well as lower QoC indicators. For example, for restraint use both positive (ie, less restraint use) and negative outcomes (ie, more restraint use) were found. With regard to pressure ulcers, we found that more staff led to fewer pressure ulcers and, therefore, better results, no matter who (registered nurse, licensed practical nurse/ licensed vocational nurse, or nurse assistant) delivered care. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent evidence was found for a positive relationship between staffing and QoC. Although some positive indications were suggested, major methodological and theoretical weaknesses (eg, timing of data collection, assumed linear relationship between staffing and QoC) limit interpretation of results. Our findings demonstrate the necessity for well-designed longitudinal studies to gain a better insight into the relationship between nurse staffing and QoC in nursing homes.
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Barbara J Bowers; Lauren W Cohen; David C Grabowski; Susan D Horn; Peter Kemper Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jane Banaszak-Holl; Orna Intrator; Jiejin Li; Qing Zheng; David G Stevenson; David C Grabowski; Richard A Hirth Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Grace Suva; Tanvi Sharma; Karen E Campbell; Ronald Gary Sibbald; Diana An; Kevin Woo Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Momotazur Rahman; Pedro Gozalo; Denise Tyler; David C Grabowski; Amal Trivedi; Vincent Mor Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Tetyana Pylypiv Shippee; Chanee D Fabius; Shekinah Fashaw-Walters; John R Bowblis; Manka Nkimbeng; Taylor I Bucy; Yinfei Duan; Weiwen Ng; Odichinma Akosionu; Jasmine L Travers Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.669