| Literature DB >> 24528873 |
Gilles Bourdin1, Armando Navarro, Shafiqul A Sarker, Anne-C Pittet, Firdausi Qadri, Shamima Sultana, Alejandro Cravioto, Kaisar A Talukder, Gloria Reuteler, Harald Brüssow.
Abstract
Eighty-nine T4-like phages from our phage collection were tested against four collections of childhood diarrhoea-associated Escherichia coli isolates representing different geographical origins (Mexico versus Bangladesh), serotypes (69 O, 27 H serotypes), pathotypes (ETEC, EPEC, EIEC, EAEC, VTEC, Shigella), epidemiological settings (community and hospitalized diarrhoea) and years of isolation. With a cocktail consisting of 3 to 14 T4-like phages, we achieved 54% to 69% coverage against predominantly EPEC isolates from Mexico, 30% to 53% against mostly ETEC isolates from a prospective survey in Bangladesh, 24% to 61% against a mixture of pathotypes isolated from hospitalized children in Bangladesh, and 60% coverage against Shigella isolates. In comparison a commercial Russian phage cocktail containing a complex mixture of many different genera of coliphages showed 19%, 33%, 50% and 90% coverage, respectively, against the four above-mentioned collections. Few O serotype-specific phages and no broad-host range phages were detected in our T4-like phage collection. Interference phenomena between the phage isolates were observed when constituting larger phage cocktails. Since the coverage of a given T4-like phage cocktail differed with geographical area and epidemiological setting, a phage composition adapted to a local situation is needed for phage therapy approaches against E. coli pathogens.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24528873 PMCID: PMC3937720 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Host-range determination of different T4-like coliphage cocktails and a commercial Russian phage cocktail on a collection of E. coli strains isolated from children with diarrhoea in Mexico
| O:H type | VF | N 1-p | N 3-p | N 6-p | N 9-p | Micro | N 10-p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O1:H45 | 2 | ||||||
| O1:H45 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| O2:H4 | 3 | ||||||
| O4:H16 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| O5:H11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
| O6:H16 | STh, LTh | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| O6:H- | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
| O8:H9 | STh, LTh | 3 | |||||
| O8:H- | STh, LTh | 3 | |||||
| O8:H11 | nt | 2 | |||||
| O9:H25 | nt | 1 | |||||
| O11:H27 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O11:H- | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O11:H- | nt | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| O11:H? | nt | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| O11:H10 | nt | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||
| O15:H18 | 1 | ||||||
| O15:H1 | nt | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| O15:H32 | nt | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| O16:H? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| O18ac:H- | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| O20:H13 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| O22:H1 | nt | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||
| O23:H15 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||
| O25:H- | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O25:H4 | nt | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| O26:H11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| O26:H8 | nt | 1 | |||||
| O27:H20 | STp | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| O28ac | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
| O29:H21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| O38:H9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O39:H12 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| O45:H- | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| O48:H30 | nt | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| O55:H6 | 3 | ||||||
| O63:H- | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
| O75:H5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| O78:H10 | STh, LTh | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O78:H10 | STh, LTh | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||
| O80:H26 | STp, LTh, | 1 | |||||
| O82:H8 | |||||||
| O84:H? | 1 | ||||||
| O85:H10 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| O86:H18 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| O86:H18 | |||||||
| O88:H10 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||
| O100:H25 | STh, LTh | ||||||
| O101:H- | 1 | 1 | |||||
| O103:H43 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||
| O103:H- | STh, LTh | 1 | 1 | ||||
| O104:H- | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||||
| O105ab:H5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O110:H16 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||
| O111ab:H- | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O112ac:H9 | 1 | ||||||
| O113:H21 | LTh | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O113:H- | 1 | ||||||
| O113:H- | 3 | ||||||
| O114:H49 | nt | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O117:H27 | SLT | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| O118:H- | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| O119:H4 | nt | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O120:H27 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| O121:H19 | |||||||
| O125ab:H33 | |||||||
| O125ab:H18 | nt | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| O125ac:H- | nt | 1 | |||||
| O126:H21 | nt | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
| O127:H11 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| O128:H27 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
| O132:H8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| O135:H? | 3 | ||||||
| O141:H32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| O141:H26 | nt | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| O142:H? | |||||||
| O145:H45 | |||||||
| O146:H8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
| O147:H32 | nt | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| O148:H28 | STp, STh, LTh | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| O149:H- | 3 | 2 | |||||
| O153:H12 | 1 | ||||||
| O158:H9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| O159:H25 | STp,LTh | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O163:H19 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| O165:H18 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| O166:H5 | 3 | 1 | |||||
| O167:H5 | LTh | 3 | |||||
| O169:H- | STp | 3 | 2 |
Notes: All isolates were E. coli strains identified by the Vitek automated bacterial Identification system (BioMerieux) O:H: The O and H serotypes were identified by reference sera VF (virulence factors): The presence of the following virulence genes from diarrhoea-associated bacteria were assessed by PCR: enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) were diagnosed by the presence of the heat-labile enterotoxin LTh (encoded by the eltA/B genes) or heat-stable enterotoxins STh (encoded estA gene) or STp (encoded by the st1 gene); enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) were diagnosed by the presence of the intimin (encoded by the eae 1 gene) and the bundle forming pilus (bfp) gene; the strains were also tested for the presence of the gene encoding the Shiga-like toxin (SLT); nt: not tested N1-p to N10-p: The indicated E. coli strains were tested for lysis graded by 1, 2 and 3 (according to the OD decrease observed at different moi, see Fig. 1) by the following phage cocktails: N1-phage (NPC1001), N3-phage (NPC1001, NPC 1005, NPC1006), N6-phage (NPC1001, NPC 1005, NPC 1006, NPC 1002, NPC 1008, NPC 1003), N9-phage (NPC 1000, NPC 1002, NPC 1003, NPC 1006, NPC 1007, NPC 1008, NPC 1009, NPC 1024, NPC 1031), N10-phage cocktail (NPC 1000, NPC 1001, NPC 1002, NPC 1003, NPC 1004, NPC 1005, NPC 1006, NPC 1007, NPC 1008, NPC 1009) (for the phage codes see Sarker et al., 2012) and the commercial Microgen ColiProteus phage cocktail Micro (containing an unknown number of phage isolates representing according to metagenomic analysis at least ten different phage genera, representing all three major families of tailed phages, McCallin et al., 2013).
Figure 1OD development in microtiter wells inoculated with a given pathogenic E. coli strain and given a T4-like phage added at three different multiplicities of infection (moi: 0.001, 0.01 and 0.1) in comparison with an uninoculated well (Ctrl−) and uninfected control culture (Ctrl+).A. The phage got a lysis score of three because it lyses at all three moi.B. The phage got a lysis score of two because it lyses only at the two higher moi.C. The phage got a lysis score of one because it lyses only at the highest moi.D. It showed a bacterium-phage pair where no lysis was observed at any of the three moi.
Lysis of pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from children who experienced a bout of diarrhoea in the community, which did not lead to hospitalization (prospective study from Dhaka/Bangladesh)
| No | Toxins | CF | O type | N 9-p | N 14-p | Microgen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LT+ST+ | CS2+CS3 | O6 | L | ||
| 2 | LT+ST+ | CS1+CS3,CS21 | O6 | L | L | |
| 3 | LT+ST+ | CS2+CS3 | O6 | L | L | |
| 4 | LT+ST+ | CS5+CS6 | L | |||
| 5 | LT+ST+ | CS1+CS3,CS21 | O6 | L | L | |
| 6 | LT+ST+ | CS14 | ||||
| 7 | LT+ | CS17 | L | |||
| 8 | LT+ST+ | CS2+CS3 | O6 | L | ||
| 9 | ST+ | CFA/I | O126 | |||
| 10 | ST+ | CS5+CS6 | O115 | L | ||
| 11 | ST+ | CFA/I | O126 | L | L | |
| 12 | LT+ST+ | CS4+CS6 | O25 | |||
| 13 | LT+ | CS7 | O114 | L | L | L |
| 14 | ST+ | CS14 | L | L | L | |
| 15 | ST+ | CFA/I,CS21 | L | L | ||
| 16 | LT+ST+ | CS45+CS6 | L | L | ||
| 17 | LT+ | CS7 | ||||
| 18 | LT+ST+ | CS5+CS6 | ||||
| 19 | LT+ST+ | CFA/I, CS21 | L | L | L | |
| 20 | LT+ST+ | CS1+CS3,CS21 | O6 | L | L | |
| 21 | LT+ST+ | CS2+CS3 | O6 | L | ||
| 22 | LT+ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 23 | LT+ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 24 | ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 25 | LT+ | NEG | L | L | ||
| 26 | ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 27 | LT+ | NEG | L | L | L | |
| 28 | ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 29 | LT+ST+ | NEG | ||||
| 30 | LT+ | NEG | L | L | ||
| 31 | ST+ | CFA/I | O126 | L | L | |
| 32 | LT+ST+ | CFA/I | ||||
| 33 | LT+ST+ | CS1+CS3,CS21 | L | |||
| 34 | ST+ | CS6 | ||||
| 35 | LT+ | NEG | L | L | L | |
| 36 | EPEC | |||||
| 37 | EPEC | |||||
| 38 | EPEC | |||||
| 39 | EPEC | L | L | |||
| 40 | EPEC | L | L |
Note: Of the 40 pathogenic E. coli isolates, 35 were identified as ETEC strains by the presence of the heat-stabile (ST) or heat-labile (LT) enterotoxin. The strains were further characterized by the presence of colonization factor (CF) antigens and by O serotype. Five strains were EPEC isolates. The lysis (L) as observed in the 10 ml test tube lysis assay on the indicated host strain is indicated for a 9-phage (Table 1) and 14-phage T4-like phage cocktail (NPC 1000, NPC 1001, NPC 1002, NPC 1003, NPC 1004, NPC 1005, NPC 1009, NPC 1032, NPC 1040, NPC 1041, NPC 1042, NPC 1043, NPC 1044, NPC 2017) and for the commercial Microgen phage cocktail. Underlined values from the 9-phage cocktail were confirmed by plaque assay. NEG, negative for tested CF.
Lysis of E. coli strains representing different pathotypes isolated in 2008 from patients hospitalized with diarrhoea at icddr,b hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh with the indicated phage cocktails
| No | Pathotype | AGE | N 9-p | N 10-p | N 14-p | Micro | Sexta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EAggEC | P | |||||
| 2 | EAggEC | P | L | L | |||
| 3 | EAggEC | P | L | ||||
| 4 | EAggEC | P | L | L | L | L | L |
| 5 | EAggEC | P | L | L | |||
| 6 | EAggEC | L | L | L | L | ||
| 7 | EAggEC | P | L | L | L | L | |
| 8 | EAggEC | P | L | L | |||
| 9 | EAggEC | P | L | L | L | ||
| 10 | EAggEC | P | L | L | L | L | |
| 11 | EIEC | L | L | L | L | L | |
| 12 | EIEC | L | L | L | L | L | |
| 13 | EIEC | L | L | L | L | L | |
| 14 | EPEC | ||||||
| 15 | EPEC | L | L | ||||
| 16 | EPEC | ||||||
| 17 | EPEC | ||||||
| 18 | EPEC | L | L | L | |||
| 19 | EPEC | P | L | L | L | L | |
| 20 | EPEC | P | |||||
| 21 | EPEC | P | |||||
| 22 | EPEC | P | L | L | L | ||
| 23 | EPEC | P | L | ||||
| 24 | EPEC | L | L | ||||
| 25 | EPEC | L | L | ||||
| 26 | EPEC | L | L | ||||
| 27 | EPEC | P | |||||
| 28 | EPEC | P | L | L | L | ||
| 29 | VTEC | L | L | L | L | L | |
| 30 | VTEC | L | L | L | L | L | |
| 31 | VTEC | L | L | L | L | ||
| 32 | ETEC O114 | P | L | L | L | ||
| 33 | ETEC O167 | P | L | L | |||
| 34 | ETEC O6 | P | L | ||||
| 35 | ETEC O25 | P | L | L | |||
| 36 | ETEC O25 | P | |||||
| 37 | ETEC O78 | P | L | L | L | L | |
| 38 | ETEC O115 | P | L | L | |||
| 39 | ETEC O114 | P | |||||
| 40 | ETEC O115 | P | L | L | |||
| 41 | ETEC O25 | P | L | ||||
| 42 | ETEC O115 | P | |||||
| 43 | ETEC O6 | P | L | L | L | ||
| 44 | ETEC O167 | P | |||||
| 45 | ETEC O114 | P | L | L | L | ||
| 46 | ETEC O8 | P |
Notes: Pathotypes: Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAggEC), Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Verotoxin producing E. coli (VTEC), Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) – the latter were serotyped for O antigen. Age: P indicates pediatric patient. Phage cocktails: N9-p cocktail consisting of 9 T4-like phages, N10-p cocktail consisting of 10 T4-like phages (for composition see Table 1); N14-p cocktail consisting of 14 T4-like phages (for composition see Table 2), Micro: ColiProteus phage cocktail; Sexta: Sextaphage cocktail from Microgen. L: lysis in 10 ml test tube assay.
Phage susceptibility of ETEC and EPEC strains isolated from pediatric diarrhoea patients hospitalized in 2011 at icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh as assessed by tube lysis and plaque assay
| No | Pathotype | N10-p | N10-p | Micro | Micro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lysis | pfu/ml | lysis | pfu/ml | ||
| 1 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 2 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 3 | EPEC | < 10 | lysis | 4 × 105 | |
| 4 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 5 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 6 | EPEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 7 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 8 | EPEC | < 10 | (lysis) | 20 | |
| 9 | EPEC | lysis | 1 × 105 | 200 | |
| 10 | ETEC | lysis | 1 × 105 | 50 | |
| 11 | EPEC | < 10 | 2000 | ||
| 12 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 13 | ETEC | lysis | 5 × 104 | 10 | |
| 14 | ETEC | < 10 | < 10 | ||
| 15 | ETEC | lysis | 1 × 105 | 10 | |
| 16 | EPEC | < 10 | 300 | ||
| 17 | ETEC | lysis | 1 × 105 | 2000 |
Lysis of Shigella strains from patients at icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| Species | Virulence gene | Serotype | N10-p | Microgen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ipaH | 1b | < 10 | 1 × 104 | |
| ipaH | 2a | < 10 | 1 × 104 | |
| ipaH | 3a | < 10 | 2 × 104 | |
| ipaH | 6 | < 10 | < 10 | |
| ipaH | 6 | 1 × 103 | 2 × 105 | |
| ipaH | 1 × 108 | 3 × 106 | ||
| ipaH | 9 × 107 | 2 × 106 | ||
| ipaH | 5 × 107 | 5 × 104 | ||
| ipaH | 1 × 105 | 1 × 105 | ||
| ipaH | 9 × 107 | 3 × 106 |