OBJECT: Surgical simulation using postmortem human heads is one of the most valid strategies for neurosurgical research and training. The authors customized an embalming formula that provides an optimal retraction profile and lifelike physical properties while preventing microorganism growth and brain decay for neurosurgical simulations in cadavers. They studied the properties of the customized formula and compared its use with the standard postmortem processing techniques: cryopreservation and formaldehyde-based embalming. METHODS: Eighteen specimens were prepared for neurosurgical simulation: 6 formaldehyde embalmed, 6 cryopreserved, and 6 custom embalmed. The customized formula is a mixture of ethanol 62.4%, glycerol 17%, phenol 10.2%, formaldehyde 2.3%, and water 8.1%. After a standard pterional craniotomy, retraction profiles and brain stiffness were studied using an intracranial pressure transducer and monitor. Preservation time-that is, time that tissue remained in optimal condition-between specimen groups was also compared through periodical reports during a 48-hour simulation. RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) retraction pressures were highest in the formaldehyde group and lowest in the cryopreserved group. The customized formula provided a mean retraction pressure almost 3 times lower than formaldehyde (36 ± 3 vs 103 ± 14 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and very similar to cryopreservation (24 ± 6 mm Hg, p < 0.01). For research purposes, preservation time in the cryopreserved group was limited to 4 hours and was unlimited for the customized and formaldehyde groups for the duration of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: The customized embalming solution described herein is optimal for allowing retraction and surgical maneuverability while preventing decay. The authors were able to significantly lower the formaldehyde content as compared with that in standard formulas. The custom embalming solution has the benefits from both cryopreservation (for example, biological brain tissue properties) and formaldehyde embalming (for example, preservation time and microorganism growth prevention) and minimizes their drawbacks, that is, rapid decay in the former and stiffness in the latter. The presented embalming formula provides an important advance for neurosurgical simulations in research and teaching.
OBJECT: Surgical simulation using postmortem human heads is one of the most valid strategies for neurosurgical research and training. The authors customized an embalming formula that provides an optimal retraction profile and lifelike physical properties while preventing microorganism growth and brain decay for neurosurgical simulations in cadavers. They studied the properties of the customized formula and compared its use with the standard postmortem processing techniques: cryopreservation and formaldehyde-based embalming. METHODS: Eighteen specimens were prepared for neurosurgical simulation: 6 formaldehyde embalmed, 6 cryopreserved, and 6 custom embalmed. The customized formula is a mixture of ethanol 62.4%, glycerol 17%, phenol 10.2%, formaldehyde 2.3%, and water 8.1%. After a standard pterional craniotomy, retraction profiles and brain stiffness were studied using an intracranial pressure transducer and monitor. Preservation time-that is, time that tissue remained in optimal condition-between specimen groups was also compared through periodical reports during a 48-hour simulation. RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) retraction pressures were highest in the formaldehyde group and lowest in the cryopreserved group. The customized formula provided a mean retraction pressure almost 3 times lower than formaldehyde (36 ± 3 vs 103 ± 14 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and very similar to cryopreservation (24 ± 6 mm Hg, p < 0.01). For research purposes, preservation time in the cryopreserved group was limited to 4 hours and was unlimited for the customized and formaldehyde groups for the duration of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: The customized embalming solution described herein is optimal for allowing retraction and surgical maneuverability while preventing decay. The authors were able to significantly lower the formaldehyde content as compared with that in standard formulas. The custom embalming solution has the benefits from both cryopreservation (for example, biological brain tissue properties) and formaldehyde embalming (for example, preservation time and microorganism growth prevention) and minimizes their drawbacks, that is, rapid decay in the former and stiffness in the latter. The presented embalming formula provides an important advance for neurosurgical simulations in research and teaching.
Authors: Roberta Rehder; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Kristopher Hooten; Peter Weinstock; Joseph R Madsen; Alan R Cohen Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Sergio García-García; José Juan González-Sánchez; Sofia Kakaizada; Michael T Lawton; Arnau Benet Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Ricardo L L Dolci; Lívia Castellari Burchianti; Alexandre Bossi Todeschini; Andre Fanhani Lopes; Mirna Duarte Barros; Américo Rubens Leite Dos Santos; Paulo Roberto Lazarini Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-08-28
Authors: Pierre Mégevand; Alain Woodtli; Aude Yulzari; G Rees Cosgrove; Shahan Momjian; Bojan V Stimec; Marco V Corniola; Jean H D Fasel Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-11-19 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Whitney C McFadden; Hadley Walsh; Felix Richter; Céline Soudant; Clare H Bryce; Patrick R Hof; Mary Fowkes; John F Crary; Andrew T McKenzie Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Arnau Benet; Julio Plata-Bello; Adib A Abla; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; David Saloner; Michael T Lawton Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-11 Impact factor: 3.411