Literature DB >> 24527106

A retrospective analysis of acoustic pressure wound therapy: effects on the healing progression of chronic wounds.

Jaimee Haan1, Sharon Lucich1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small clinical studies suggest adjunctive use of acoustic pressure wound therapy (APWT) may enhance wound healing, even in challenging patients. This noncontact low-frequency, nonthermal ultrasound therapy for assisting with the debridement of necrotic tissue from challenging wounds is generally better tolerated by patients for whom treatment-related wound pain, anticoagulation, or medical instability precludes sharp, surgical, or mechanical debridement.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in amount of devitalized tissue, amount and type of wound drainage, and wound surface area after administration of APWT.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 48 consecutive patients treated with adjunctive APWT at a single center between January 2006 and October 2007.
METHODS: Paired comparisons of baseline versus posttreatment values for wound area, tissue characteristics, drainage, and pain were analyzed. Time, frequency, and duration of APWT and treatment-related adverse events were collected.
RESULTS: APWT was administered a mean of 2.1 times per week for a mean of 4.1 minutes per session. Mean duration of therapy was 5.5 weeks. Median wound area was reduced by 92% from baseline to end of APWT (6.2 cm(2) to 0.2 cm(2),P < .0001). The proportion of wounds with >75% granulation tissue increased from 37% to 89% (P < .0001). The proportion of wounds without fibrin slough or eschar increased from 31% to 75% (P < .0001) and from 72% to 94% (P = .02), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, lack of control group, small sample population.
CONCLUSION: As an adjunct to conventional wound management, APWT appears to improve parameters associated with wound healing, including increased tissue granulation, decreased necrotic tissue, and decreased wound area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic pressure wound therapy; Adjunctive therapy; Chronic wounds; Noncontact low-frequency; Ultrasound

Year:  2009        PMID: 24527106      PMCID: PMC3478917          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcws.2008.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec        ISSN: 1876-4983


  7 in total

Review 1.  The debridement of chronic wounds: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Bradley; N Cullum; T Sheldon
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Wound healing.

Authors:  W M Bryant
Journal:  Clin Symp       Date:  1977

3.  Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of MIST ultrasound therapy for the healing of chronic wounds.

Authors:  William J Ennis; Wesley Valdes; Marianne Gainer; Patricio Meneses
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.347

4.  Ultrasound therapy for recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study.

Authors:  William J Ennis; Phil Foremann; Neal Mozen; Joi Massey; Teresa Conner-Kerr; Patricio Meneses
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  The effect of noncontact, low-intensity, low-frequency therapeutic ultrasound on lower-extremity chronic wound pain: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Marie L Gehling; John H Samies
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Use of noncontact low-frequency ultrasound in the treatment of chronic foot and leg ulcerations: a 51-patient analysis.

Authors:  Steven J Kavros; Erik C Schenck
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

7.  Treatment of ischemic wounds with noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound: the Mayo clinic experience, 2004-2006.

Authors:  Steven J Kavros; Jenny L Miller; Steven W Hanna
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.347

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of non contact low-frequency ultrasound on healing of suspected deep tissue injury: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy S Honaker; Michael R Forston; Emily A Davis; Michelle M Wiesner; Jennifer A Morgan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Non-contact low-frequency ultrasound therapy compared with UK standard of care for venous leg ulcers: a single-centre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith White; Nicola Ivins; Antony Wilkes; Grace Carolan-Rees; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.