Literature DB >> 16234574

Ultrasound therapy for recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study.

William J Ennis1, Phil Foremann, Neal Mozen, Joi Massey, Teresa Conner-Kerr, Patricio Meneses.   

Abstract

An estimated 15% of patients with diabetes will develop a foot ulcer sometime in their life, making them 30 to 40 times more likely to undergo amputation due to a non-healing foot ulcer than the non-diabetic population. To determine the safety and efficacy of a new, non-contact, kilohertz ultrasound therapy for the healing of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers - as well as to evaluate the impact on total closure and quantitative bacterial cultures and the effect on healing of various levels of sharp/surgical debridement - a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in hospital-based and private wound care clinics. Patients (55 met criteria for efficacy analysis) received standard of care, which included products that provide a moist environment, offloading diabetic shoes and socks, debridement, wound evaluation, and measurement. The "therapy" was either active 40 KHz ultrasound delivered by a saline mist or a "sham device" which delivered a saline mist without the use of ultrasound. After 12 weeks of care, the proportion of wounds healed (defined as complete epithelialization without drainage) in the active ultrasound therapy device group was significantly higher than that in the sham control group (40.7% versus 14.3%, P = 0.0366, Fisher's exact test). The ultrasound treatment was easy to use and no difference in the number and type of adverse events between the two treatment groups was noted. Of interest, wounds were debrided at baseline followed by a quantitative culture biopsy. The results of these cultures demonstrated a significant bioburden (greater than 10(5)) in the majority of cases, despite a lack of clinical signs of infection. Compared to control, this therapeutic modality was found to increase the healing rate of recalcitrant, diabetic foot ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  28 in total

Review 1.  The diabetic foot: the importance of biofilms and wound bed preparation.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Lisa Martinez; Robert Kirsner
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Biophysical Technologies for Management of Wound Bioburden.

Authors:  Holly Korzendorfer; Heather Hettrick
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Electrophysical therapy for managing diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel L-C Kwan; Gladys L-Y Cheing; Sinfia K-S Vong; Sing K Lo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Negative pressure surgical management after pathological scar surgical excision: a first report.

Authors:  Daniele Bollero; Valeria Malvasio; Fabio Catalano; Maurizio Stella
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Does physical therapy and rehabilitation improve outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers?

Authors:  Yasemin Turan; Bulent M Ertugrul; Benjamin A Lipsky; Kevser Bayraktar
Journal:  World J Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-20

6.  A retrospective analysis of acoustic pressure wound therapy: effects on the healing progression of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Jaimee Haan; Sharon Lucich
Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec       Date:  2009-05-01

Review 7.  Wound Healing Devices Brief Vignettes.

Authors:  Caesar A Anderson; Marc A Hare; George A Perdrizet
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A pilot study evaluating non-contact low-frequency ultrasound and underlying molecular mechanism on diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Min Yao; Hatice Hasturk; Alpdogan Kantarci; Guosheng Gu; Silvia Garcia-Lavin; Matteo Fabbi; Nanjin Park; Hisae Hayashi; Khaled Attala; Michael A French; Vickie R Driver
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy suppresses the early proinflammatory immune response to a severe cutaneous burn injury.

Authors:  Thomas A Davis; Alexander Stojadinovic; Khairul Anam; Mihret Amare; Shruti Naik; George E Peoples; Douglas Tadaki; Eric A Elster
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  The ABC's of wound care.

Authors:  Kelly Bumpus; Michael A Maier
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.