Literature DB >> 24526242

Dissociable effects of auditory attention switching and stimulus-response compatibility.

Vera Lawo1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Using a task-switching variant of dichotic listening, we examined the ability to intentionally switch auditory attention between two speakers. We specifically focused on possible interactions with stimulus-response compatibility. In each trial, two words, one spoken by a male and another by a female, were presented dichotically via headphones. In one experimental group, two animal names were presented, and the relevant animal had to be judged as smaller or larger than a sheep by pressing a left or right response key. In another group, two number words were presented and had to be judged as smaller or larger than 5. In each trial, a visual cue indicated the gender of the relevant speaker. Performance was worse when the gender of the relevant speaker switched from trial to trial. These switch costs were larger for animal names than for number words, suggesting stronger interference with slower access to semantic categories. Responses were slower if the side of the target stimulus (as defined by the relevant gender) was spatially incompatible with the required response (as defined by the size judgment). This stimulus-response compatibility effect did not differ across stimulus material and did not interact with attentional switch costs. These results indicate that auditory switch costs and stimulus-response compatibility effects are dissociable, referring to target selection and response selection, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24526242     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0545-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  22 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

2.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

Authors:  Joel Lachter; Kenneth I Forster; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Task-independent semantic activation for numbers and animals.

Authors:  Marc Thioux; Mauro Pesenti; Nicolas Costes; Anne De Volder; Xavier Seron
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-29

4.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?

Authors:  Stephen Monsell; Guy A Mizon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan; Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

8.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Varieties of numerical abilities.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

10.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical ordered sequences: insights from a random generation task.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Di Bono; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Katja Kerstin Schneider; Birte Moeller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-21

2.  Editorial for special issue: "auditory attention: merging paradigms and perspectives".

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-18

3.  Auditory spatial attention capture, disengagement, and response selection in normal aging.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.