Katie E Raffel1, Anna P Goddu2,3,4, Monica E Peek2,3,4,5. 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Raffel) 2. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Goddu, Dr Peek) 3. Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Goddu, Dr Peek) 4. Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Goddu, Dr Peek) 5. Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Peek)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate how retention strategies employed by the Diabetes Empowerment Program (DEP) contributed to retention. METHODS: An experienced moderator conducted in-depth interviews (n = 7) and 4 focus groups (n = 29) with former DEP participants. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using iteratively modified coding guidelines. Results were analyzed using Atlas.ti 4.2 software. RESULTS: Participants were African American and predominantly female, low income, and with more than 1 diabetes complication. Key retention themes included: (1) educator characteristics and interpersonal skills ("The warmth of the staff . . . kept me coming back for more."), (2) accessible information ("I didn't know anything about diabetes [before]. I was just given the medicine."), (3) social support ("I realized I wasn't the only one who has diabetes."), (4) the use of narrative ("It's enlightening to talk about [my diabetes]."), and (5) the African American helping tradition ("I went not just for myself but for my husband."). CONCLUSIONS: While many interventions focus on costly logistics and incentives to retain at-risk participants, study findings suggest that utilizing culturally tailored curricula and emphasizing interpersonal skills and social support may be more effective strategies to retain low-income African Americans in diabetes education programs.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate how retention strategies employed by the Diabetes Empowerment Program (DEP) contributed to retention. METHODS: An experienced moderator conducted in-depth interviews (n = 7) and 4 focus groups (n = 29) with former DEP participants. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using iteratively modified coding guidelines. Results were analyzed using Atlas.ti 4.2 software. RESULTS:Participants were African American and predominantly female, low income, and with more than 1 diabetes complication. Key retention themes included: (1) educator characteristics and interpersonal skills ("The warmth of the staff . . . kept me coming back for more."), (2) accessible information ("I didn't know anything about diabetes [before]. I was just given the medicine."), (3) social support ("I realized I wasn't the only one who has diabetes."), (4) the use of narrative ("It's enlightening to talk about [my diabetes]."), and (5) the African American helping tradition ("I went not just for myself but for my husband."). CONCLUSIONS: While many interventions focus on costly logistics and incentives to retain at-risk participants, study findings suggest that utilizing culturally tailored curricula and emphasizing interpersonal skills and social support may be more effective strategies to retain low-income African Americans in diabetes education programs.
Authors: Monica L Baskin; Lisa C Gary; Claudia M Hardy; Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Isabel Scarinci; Mona N Fouad; Edward E Partridge Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2011 Jan-Feb
Authors: Denise E Bonds; Daniel J Zaccaro; Andrew J Karter; Joe V Selby; Mohammed Saad; David C Goff Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Thomas K Houston; Jeroan J Allison; Marc Sussman; Wendy Horn; Cheryl L Holt; John Trobaugh; Maribel Salas; Maria Pisu; Yendelela L Cuffee; Damien Larkin; Sharina D Person; Bruce Barton; Catarina I Kiefe; Sandral Hullett Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W H Polonsky; B J Anderson; P A Lohrer; G Welch; A M Jacobson; J E Aponte; C E Schwartz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Matthew W Kreuter; Trent D Buskirk; Kathleen Holmes; Eddie M Clark; Lou Robinson; Xuemei Si; Suchita Rath; Deborah Erwin; Anne Philipneri; Elisia Cohen; Katherine Mathews Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Dean Schillinger; John Piette; Kevin Grumbach; Frances Wang; Clifford Wilson; Carolyn Daher; Krishelle Leong-Grotz; Cesar Castro; Andrew B Bindman Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-01-13
Authors: Karen A Robinson; Cheryl R Dennison; Dawn M Wayman; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Elizabeth B Lynch; Rebecca Liebman; Jennifer Ventrelle; Kathryn Keim; Bradley M Appelhans; Elizabeth F Avery; Bettina Tahsin; Hong Li; Merle Shapera; Leon Fogelfeld Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 2.226