PURPOSE: This systematic review provides a comprehensive, updated assessment of programs with evidence of effectiveness in reducing teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), or associated sexual risk behaviors. METHODS: The review was conducted in four steps. First, multiple literature search strategies were used to identify relevant studies released from 1989 through January 2011. Second, identified studies were screened against prespecified eligibility criteria. Third, studies were assessed by teams of two trained reviewers for the quality and execution of their research designs. Fourth, for studies that passed the quality assessment, the review team extracted and analyzed information on the research design, study sample, evaluation setting, and program impacts. RESULTS: A total of 88 studies met the review criteria for study quality and were included in the data extraction and analysis. The studies examined a range of programs delivered in diverse settings. Most studies had mixed-gender and predominately African-American research samples (70% and 51%, respectively). Randomized controlled trials accounted for the large majority (87%) of included studies. Most studies (76%) included multiple follow-ups, with sample sizes ranging from 62 to 5,244. Analysis of the study impact findings identified 31 programs with evidence of effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Research conducted since the late 1980s has identified more than two dozen teen pregnancy and STI prevention programs with evidence of effectiveness. Key strengths of this research are the large number of randomized controlled trials, the common use of multiple follow-up periods, and attention to a broad range of programs delivered in diverse settings. Two main gaps are a lack of replication studies and the need for more research on Latino youth and other high-risk populations. In addressing these gaps, researchers must overcome common limitations in study design, analysis, and reporting that have negatively affected prior research.
PURPOSE: This systematic review provides a comprehensive, updated assessment of programs with evidence of effectiveness in reducing teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), or associated sexual risk behaviors. METHODS: The review was conducted in four steps. First, multiple literature search strategies were used to identify relevant studies released from 1989 through January 2011. Second, identified studies were screened against prespecified eligibility criteria. Third, studies were assessed by teams of two trained reviewers for the quality and execution of their research designs. Fourth, for studies that passed the quality assessment, the review team extracted and analyzed information on the research design, study sample, evaluation setting, and program impacts. RESULTS: A total of 88 studies met the review criteria for study quality and were included in the data extraction and analysis. The studies examined a range of programs delivered in diverse settings. Most studies had mixed-gender and predominately African-American research samples (70% and 51%, respectively). Randomized controlled trials accounted for the large majority (87%) of included studies. Most studies (76%) included multiple follow-ups, with sample sizes ranging from 62 to 5,244. Analysis of the study impact findings identified 31 programs with evidence of effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Research conducted since the late 1980s has identified more than two dozen teen pregnancy and STI prevention programs with evidence of effectiveness. Key strengths of this research are the large number of randomized controlled trials, the common use of multiple follow-up periods, and attention to a broad range of programs delivered in diverse settings. Two main gaps are a lack of replication studies and the need for more research on Latino youth and other high-risk populations. In addressing these gaps, researchers must overcome common limitations in study design, analysis, and reporting that have negatively affected prior research.
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Millan A AbiNader; Michael G Vaughn; Mariana Sanchez; Mario De La Rosa Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Christina M DuBois; Oriana Vesga Lopez; Eleanor E Beale; Brian C Healy; Julia K Boehm; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Melissa F Peskin; Karin K Coyle; Pamela M Anderson; B A Laris; Jill R Glassman; Heather M Franks; Melanie A Thiel; Susan C Potter; Tracy Unti; Sharon Edwards; Kimberly Johnson-Baker; Paula M Cuccaro; Pamela Diamond; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Elizabeth R Baumler; Efrat K Gabay; Susan Tortolero Emery Journal: J Prim Prev Date: 2019-06
Authors: Ali Mirzazadeh; M Antonia Biggs; Amanda Viitanen; Hacsi Horvath; Li Yan Wang; Richard Dunville; Lisa C Barrios; James G Kahn; Elliot Marseille Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2018-05