Literature DB >> 24523618

Qualitative evaluation of care plans for Canadian breast and head-and-neck cancer survivors.

K Collie1, J McCormick2, A Waller2, C Railton3, L Shirt4, J Chobanuk5, A Taylor6, H Lau4, D Hao4, B Walley3, B Kapusta7, A A Joy8, L E Carlson2, J Giese-Davis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (scps) have been recommended as a way to ease the transition from active cancer treatment to follow-up care, to reduce uncertainty for survivors in the management of their ongoing health, and to improve continuity of care. The objective of the demonstration project reported here was to assess the value of scps for cancer survivors in western Canada.
METHODS: The Alberta CancerBridges team developed, implemented, and evaluated scps for 36 breast and 21 head-and-neck cancer survivors. For the evaluation, we interviewed 12 of the survivors, 9 nurses who delivered the scps, and 3 family physicians who received the scps (n = 24 in total). We asked about satisfaction, usefulness, emotional impact, and communication value. We collected written feedback from the three groups about positive aspects of the scps and possible improvements (n = 85). We analyzed the combined data using qualitative thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Survivors, nurses, and family physicians agreed that scps could ease the transition to survivorship partly by enhancing communication between survivors and care providers. Survivors appreciated the individualized attention and the comprehensiveness of the plans. They described positive emotional impacts, but wanted a way to ensure that their physicians received the scps. Nurses and physicians responded positively, but expressed concern about the time required to implement the plans. Suggestions for streamlining the process included providing survivors with scp templates in advance, auto-populating the templates for the nurses, and creating summary pages for physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest ways in which scps could help to improve the transition to cancer survivorship and provide starting points for larger feasibility studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care plans; breast cancer; communication; head-and-neck cancer; qualitative analysis; survivorship

Year:  2014        PMID: 24523618      PMCID: PMC3921045          DOI: 10.3747/co.21.1698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  44 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing research on cancer survivors.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Quality of life and head and neck cancer: a 5 year prospective study.

Authors:  Helmut Abendstein; Mats Nordgren; Morten Boysen; Magnus Jannert; Ewa Silander; Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist; Eva Hammerlid; Kristin Bjordal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Follow-up of adult cancer survivors: new paradigms for survivorship care planning.

Authors:  Sandra J Horning
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.722

4.  The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mary Ann Burg; Ellen D S Lopez; Amy Dailey; Mary Elspeth Keller; Brendan Prendergast
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning.

Authors:  P A Ganz; J H Rowland; K Desmond; B E Meyerowitz; G E Wyatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patient preferences concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services.

Authors:  Tiffany J Marbach; Julie Griffie
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Clinical update: psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  M Tish Knobf
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 8.  Failing to plan is planning to fail: improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans.

Authors:  Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Optimizing follow-up after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Screening practices in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Norma C Terrin; Usha Menon; Gary L Kreps; Kathy McCance; Susan K Parsons; Kathleen H Mooney
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluating primary care providers' views on survivorship care plans generated by an electronic health record system.

Authors:  SarahMaria Donohue; Mary E Sesto; David L Hahn; Kevin A Buhr; Elizabeth A Jacobs; James M Sosman; Molly J Andreason; Douglas A Wiegmann; Amye J Tevaarwerk
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Automating Treatment Summary Development Using Electronic Billing Information: A Pilot Study of Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Ranjit Sukhu; Elizabeth Fortier; Kevin Oeffinger; Stacie Corcoran; Andrew Salner; Andrew J Vickers; Mary S McCabe; Talya Salz
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  K Reynolds; M Spavor; Y Brandelli; C Kwok; Y Li; M Disciglio; L E Carlson; F Schulte; R Anderson; P Grundy; J Giese-Davis
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up.

Authors:  M A Shea-Budgell; X Kostaras; K P Myhill; N A Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Survivorship care plan outcomes for primary care physicians, cancer survivors, and systems: a scoping review.

Authors:  Weston LaGrandeur; Julie Armin; Carol L Howe; Leila Ali-Akbarian
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Alberta CancerBridges development of a care plan evaluation measure.

Authors:  J Giese-Davis; J Sisler; L Zhong; Y Brandelli; J L McCormick; C Railton; L Shirt; H Lau; D Hao; J Chobanuk; B Walley; A A Joy; A Taylor; L Carlson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Qualitative evaluation: a critical and interpretative complementary approach to improve health programs and services.

Authors:  Luz María Tejada Tayabas; Teresita Castillo León; Joel Monarrez Espino
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2014-08-22

8.  Survivorship care plan experiences among childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and their families.

Authors:  Samantha T Pannier; Karely Mann; Echo L Warner; Stephanie Rosen; Akanksha Acharya; Claire Hacking; Cheryl Gerdy; Jennifer Wright; Yelena P Wu; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Increasing our understanding of dying of breast cancer: Comorbidities and care.

Authors:  G M Johnston; R Urquhart; L Lethbridge; M MacIntyre
Journal:  Prog Palliat Care       Date:  2015-12-26

10.  Perspectives of Survivorship Care Plans Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michelle J Naughton; Anne M Noonan; Janell Pisegna; Jennifer DeSalvo; Maryam B Lustberg
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.