K Collie1, J McCormick2, A Waller2, C Railton3, L Shirt4, J Chobanuk5, A Taylor6, H Lau4, D Hao4, B Walley3, B Kapusta7, A A Joy8, L E Carlson2, J Giese-Davis2. 1. Department of Psychosocial and Spiritual Resources, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB. ; Department of Oncology, Palliative Care Division, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB. 2. Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. ; Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB. 3. Department of Oncology, Calgary Region Breast Health Program, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Head-and-Neck Tumour Group, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB. 5. Comprehensive Breast Care Program, Community Oncology, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Edmonton, AB. 6. Breast Cancer Supportive Care Foundation, Calgary, AB. 7. Cancer survivor and writer. 8. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (scps) have been recommended as a way to ease the transition from active cancer treatment to follow-up care, to reduce uncertainty for survivors in the management of their ongoing health, and to improve continuity of care. The objective of the demonstration project reported here was to assess the value of scps for cancer survivors in western Canada. METHODS: The Alberta CancerBridges team developed, implemented, and evaluated scps for 36 breast and 21 head-and-neck cancer survivors. For the evaluation, we interviewed 12 of the survivors, 9 nurses who delivered the scps, and 3 family physicians who received the scps (n = 24 in total). We asked about satisfaction, usefulness, emotional impact, and communication value. We collected written feedback from the three groups about positive aspects of the scps and possible improvements (n = 85). We analyzed the combined data using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Survivors, nurses, and family physicians agreed that scps could ease the transition to survivorship partly by enhancing communication between survivors and care providers. Survivors appreciated the individualized attention and the comprehensiveness of the plans. They described positive emotional impacts, but wanted a way to ensure that their physicians received the scps. Nurses and physicians responded positively, but expressed concern about the time required to implement the plans. Suggestions for streamlining the process included providing survivors with scp templates in advance, auto-populating the templates for the nurses, and creating summary pages for physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest ways in which scps could help to improve the transition to cancer survivorship and provide starting points for larger feasibility studies.
BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (scps) have been recommended as a way to ease the transition from active cancer treatment to follow-up care, to reduce uncertainty for survivors in the management of their ongoing health, and to improve continuity of care. The objective of the demonstration project reported here was to assess the value of scps for cancer survivors in western Canada. METHODS: The Alberta CancerBridges team developed, implemented, and evaluated scps for 36 breast and 21 head-and-neck cancer survivors. For the evaluation, we interviewed 12 of the survivors, 9 nurses who delivered the scps, and 3 family physicians who received the scps (n = 24 in total). We asked about satisfaction, usefulness, emotional impact, and communication value. We collected written feedback from the three groups about positive aspects of the scps and possible improvements (n = 85). We analyzed the combined data using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Survivors, nurses, and family physicians agreed that scps could ease the transition to survivorship partly by enhancing communication between survivors and care providers. Survivors appreciated the individualized attention and the comprehensiveness of the plans. They described positive emotional impacts, but wanted a way to ensure that their physicians received the scps. Nurses and physicians responded positively, but expressed concern about the time required to implement the plans. Suggestions for streamlining the process included providing survivors with scp templates in advance, auto-populating the templates for the nurses, and creating summary pages for physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest ways in which scps could help to improve the transition to cancer survivorship and provide starting points for larger feasibility studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Care plans; breast cancer; communication; head-and-neck cancer; qualitative analysis; survivorship
Authors: Mary Ann Burg; Ellen D S Lopez; Amy Dailey; Mary Elspeth Keller; Brendan Prendergast Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Deborah K Mayer; Norma C Terrin; Usha Menon; Gary L Kreps; Kathy McCance; Susan K Parsons; Kathleen H Mooney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: SarahMaria Donohue; Mary E Sesto; David L Hahn; Kevin A Buhr; Elizabeth A Jacobs; James M Sosman; Molly J Andreason; Douglas A Wiegmann; Amye J Tevaarwerk Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Shrujal S Baxi; Ranjit Sukhu; Elizabeth Fortier; Kevin Oeffinger; Stacie Corcoran; Andrew Salner; Andrew J Vickers; Mary S McCabe; Talya Salz Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: K Reynolds; M Spavor; Y Brandelli; C Kwok; Y Li; M Disciglio; L E Carlson; F Schulte; R Anderson; P Grundy; J Giese-Davis Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: J Giese-Davis; J Sisler; L Zhong; Y Brandelli; J L McCormick; C Railton; L Shirt; H Lau; D Hao; J Chobanuk; B Walley; A A Joy; A Taylor; L Carlson Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michelle J Naughton; Anne M Noonan; Janell Pisegna; Jennifer DeSalvo; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.302