Weston LaGrandeur1, Julie Armin2, Carol L Howe3, Leila Ali-Akbarian4. 1. University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1733 E Silver Street, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. westonlag@email.arizona.edu. 2. Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona, 1450 N. Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. 3. Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724-5079, USA. 4. Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, 1450 N. Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: With the focus on survivorship care-coordination between oncology and primary care providers (PCPs), there is a need to assess the research regarding the use of survivorship care plans (SCPs) and determine emerging research areas. We sought to find out how primary care physicians have been involved in the use of SCPs and determine SCP's effectiveness in improving care for cancer survivors. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify gaps in the current research and reveal opportunities for further research. METHODS: We followed the methodology for scoping studies which consists of identifying the research question, locating relevant studies, selecting studies, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. RESULTS: Out of 5375 original articles identified in the literature search, 25 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight articles examined PCP-only related outcomes, eight examined survivor-only related outcomes, eight examined mixed outcomes between both groups, and one examined system-based outcomes. Findings highlighted several areas where SCPs may provide benefits, including increased confidence among PCPs in managing the care of survivors and increased quality of life and well-being for survivors. This research also highlighted the need for careful consideration of SCP mode of delivery and content in order to maximize their utility to patients and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, SCPs may benefit providers and health care systems, but the benefits to patients remain unclear. Further research on the potential benefits of SCPs to particular patient populations is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: SCPs appear to be beneficial to PCPs in improving overall quality of care. However, more work needs to be done to understand the direct impact on cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: With the focus on survivorship care-coordination between oncology and primary care providers (PCPs), there is a need to assess the research regarding the use of survivorship care plans (SCPs) and determine emerging research areas. We sought to find out how primary care physicians have been involved in the use of SCPs and determine SCP's effectiveness in improving care for cancer survivors. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify gaps in the current research and reveal opportunities for further research. METHODS: We followed the methodology for scoping studies which consists of identifying the research question, locating relevant studies, selecting studies, charting the data, and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. RESULTS: Out of 5375 original articles identified in the literature search, 25 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight articles examined PCP-only related outcomes, eight examined survivor-only related outcomes, eight examined mixed outcomes between both groups, and one examined system-based outcomes. Findings highlighted several areas where SCPs may provide benefits, including increased confidence among PCPs in managing the care of survivors and increased quality of life and well-being for survivors. This research also highlighted the need for careful consideration of SCP mode of delivery and content in order to maximize their utility to patients and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, SCPs may benefit providers and health care systems, but the benefits to patients remain unclear. Further research on the potential benefits of SCPs to particular patient populations is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: SCPs appear to be beneficial to PCPs in improving overall quality of care. However, more work needs to be done to understand the direct impact on cancer survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivors; Primary care providers; Survivorship care plans
Authors: SarahMaria Donohue; Mary E Sesto; David L Hahn; Kevin A Buhr; Elizabeth A Jacobs; James M Sosman; Molly J Andreason; Douglas A Wiegmann; Amye J Tevaarwerk Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Laura P Forsythe; Catherine M Alfano; Tenbroeck Smith; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Patricia A Ganz; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicole P M Ezendam; Kim A H Nicolaije; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; M Caroline Vos; Dorry Boll; Marjo van Bommel; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Bradley D McDowell; Linda Rubenstein; Mary Charlton; Jane Pendergast; Grelda Yazmin Juarez; Neeraj K Arora Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Annelies H Boekhout; Elizabeth Maunsell; Gregory R Pond; Jim A Julian; Doug Coyle; Mark N Levine; Eva Grunfeld Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kim L Dittus; Brian L Sprague; Claire M Pace; Dorothy A Dulko; Lori A Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins; Berta M Geller Journal: J Gen Pract (Los Angel) Date: 2014-05-26
Authors: Anna Jansana; Margarita Posso; Inmaculada Guerrero; Alexandra Prados-Torres; Maria Isabel Del Cura; Xavier Castells; Maria Sala Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Colleen M Morken; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Amanda K Swiecichowski; James E Haine; Zachary T Williams; Kirsten Norslien; Natalia Arroyo; Xiao Zhang; Bethaney Campbell; Eneida A Mendonca; Mark B Juckett; Mary E Sesto Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jennifer DeSalvo; Dori Klemanski; Christian Stephens; Anne M Noonan; Seuli Brill; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-25
Authors: Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-25
Authors: Katherine R Sterba; Kent Armeson; Jane Zapka; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Megan L Scallion; Tiffany K Wall; Jama Olsen; Evan M Graboyes; Anthony J Alberg; Terry A Day Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Melanie R Keats; Kelsey Shea; Louise Parker; Samuel A Stewart; Annette Flanders; Mark Bernstein Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.037