Literature DB >> 24523527

Evidence for a reference frame transformation of vestibular signal contributions to voluntary reaching.

Ian Moreau-Debord1, Christophe Z Martin, Marianne Landry, Andrea M Green.   

Abstract

To contribute appropriately to voluntary reaching during body motion, vestibular signals must be transformed from a head-centered to a body-centered reference frame. We quantitatively investigated the evidence for this transformation during online reach execution by using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to simulate rotation about a head-fixed, roughly naso-occipital axis as human subjects made planar reaching movements to a remembered location with their head in different orientations. If vestibular signals that contribute to reach execution have been transformed from a head-centered to a body-centered reference frame, the same stimulation should be interpreted as body tilt with the head upright but as vertical-axis rotation with the head inclined forward. Consequently, GVS should perturb reach trajectories in a head-orientation-dependent way. Consistent with this prediction, GVS applied during reach execution induced trajectory deviations that were significantly larger with the head forward compared with upright. Only with the head forward were trajectories consistently deviated in opposite directions for rightward versus leftward simulated rotation, as appropriate to compensate for body vertical-axis rotation. These results demonstrate that vestibular signals contributing to online reach execution have indeed been transformed from a head-centered to a body-centered reference frame. Reach deviation amplitudes were comparable to those predicted for ideal compensation for body rotation using a biomechanical limb model. Finally, by comparing the effects of application of GVS during reach execution versus prior to reach onset we also provide evidence that spatially transformed vestibular signals contribute to at least partially distinct compensation mechanisms for body motion during reach planning versus execution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  galvanic stimulation; reaching; reference frame transformation; vestibular signals

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24523527     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00419.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  7 in total

1.  Highlights from the 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.

Authors:  Alexander Mathis; Andrea R Pack; Rodrigo S Maeda; Samuel D McDougle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Keyser; W Pieter Medendorp; Luc P J Selen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Role of Rostral Fastigial Neurons in Encoding a Body-Centered Representation of Translation in Three Dimensions.

Authors:  Christophe Z Martin; Jessica X Brooks; Andrea M Green
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Stability of Phase Relationships While Coordinating Arm Reaches with Whole Body Motion.

Authors:  Romy S Bakker; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  State Estimation for Early Feedback Responses in Reaching: Intramodal or Multimodal?

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19

6.  Vestibular feedback maintains reaching accuracy during body movement.

Authors:  Craig P Smith; Raymond F Reynolds
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Is the manual following response an attempt to compensate for inferred self-motion?

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Eli Brenner; Jacques Duysens; Sabine Verschueren; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.