Literature DB >> 24522862

Fixation of the shorter cementless GTS™ stem: biomechanical comparison between a conventional and an innovative implant design.

J Nadorf1, M Thomsen, S Gantz, R Sonntag, J P Kretzer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conventional cementless total hip arthroplasty already shows very good clinical results. Nevertheless, implant revision is often accompanied by massive bone loss. The new shorter GTS™ stem has been introduced to conserve femoral bone stock. However, no long-term clinical results were available for this implant. A biomechanical comparison of the GTS™ stem with the clinically well-established CLS(®) stem was therefore preformed to investigate the targeted stem philosophy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four GTS™ stems and four CLS(®) stems were implanted in a standardized manner in eight synthetic femurs. A high-precision measuring device was used to determine micromotions of the stem and bone during different load applications. Calculation of relative micromotions at the bone-implant interface allowed the rotational implant stability and the bending behavior of the stem to be determined.
RESULTS: Lowest relative micromotions were detected near the lesser trochanter within the proximal part of both stems. Maximum relative micromotions were measured near the distal tip of the stems, indicating a proximal fixation of both stems. For the varus-valgus-torque application, a comparable stem bending behavior was shown for both stems.
CONCLUSION: Both stems seem to provide a comparable and adequate primary stability. The shortened GTS™ design has a comparable rotational stability and bone-implant flexibility compared to a conventional stem. This study demonstrates that the CLS(®) stem and the GTS™ stem exhibit similar biomechanical behavior. However, a clinical confirmation of these experimental results is still required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24522862     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-1946-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  4 in total

1.  Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Matthias Woiczinski; Tobias F Schmidutz; Patrick Weber; Alexander C Paulus; Arnd Steinbrück; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty with a short versus conventional cementless stem: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Antonello Della Rocca; Davide Ferrentino; Costanza Pizzi; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.

Authors:  Jan Nadorf; Stefan Kinkel; Simone Gantz; Eike Jakubowitz; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Short stems have lower load at failure than double-wedged stems in a cadaveric cementless fracture model.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Martin Bäumlein; Philipp Dworschak; Christopher Bliemel; Thomas Neri; Markus D Schofer; Thomas J Heyse
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.