Literature DB >> 24522122

PIP breast implant removal: a study of 828 cases.

S Oulharj1, J Pauchot2, Y Tropet2.   

Abstract

In March, 2010, the French Health Products Safety Agency suspended the sale of prefilled silicone breast implants manufactured by Poly Implants Prosthèse Prothese (PIP) because of a high failure rate and the use of an inappropriate silicone gel that did not comply with CE marking. These findings led to an international medical crisis. In France, 30,000 female patients had PIP implants. In our Department, 1150 PIP breast implants had been implanted in 630 patients since 2001. A retrospective study was conducted to define the rupture rate of these implants and the complications that arise. The women included in the study underwent implant removal from May 2010 to September 2012 for preventive or curative reasons. Data were collected from medical records that included: results of clinical examination, breast ultrasound before removal, rates of implant rupture, results of biopsy of periprosthetic capsule and pericapsule tissue and postoperative complications. A total of 828 PIP breast implants were removed in 455 patients. The rate of ruptured implants was 7.73% (64/828), corresponding to 11.6% of patients. A periprosthetic effusion was associated with rupture in 44% of cases. Breast ultrasound indicated a rupture for 87 implants; 32% were true positives and 3% were false negatives. Periprosthetic capsule biopsy demonstrated the presence of a foreign body, which seemed to be silicone, in 26% of cases and the presence of inflammation in 13% of cases. No siliconoma-type lesion was identified in the pericapsular tissue at biopsy. A total of 14 implants presented perspiration at removal. A statistically significant difference was found between the rates of rupture for texturised implants as compared to the smooth-surfaced implants. There were eight post-revisional-surgery complications (1%) and three cases of breast adenocarcinoma. The preventive explantation of PIP breast implants is justified given the high failure rate (7.73%) and given patients' exposure to silicone gel that did not comply with CE standards in the absence of rupture, through the early perspiration of implants.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; PIP implants; Rupture; Silicone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24522122     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  PIP breast implants: rupture rate and correlation with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Moschetta; M Telegrafo; I Cornacchia; L Vincenti; V Ranieri; A Cirili; L Rella; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2.  Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) incidence of rupture: a retrospective MR analysis in 64 patients.

Authors:  Mariella Scotto di Santolo; Bianca Cusati; Alfonso Ragozzino; Nicoletta Dell'Aprovitola; Alessandra Acquaviva; Michele Altiero; Antonello Accurso; Albina Riccardi; Massimo Imbriaco
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-12

Review 3.  The clinical implications of poly implant prothèse breast implants: an overview.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Abdul Kasem; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Thoracic outlet syndrome following breast implant rupture.

Authors:  Raakhi Mistry; Yugesh Caplash; Pratyush Giri; Daniel Kearney; Marcus Wagstaff
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

5.  An unusual case of a ruptured Poly Implant Prothèse breast implant associated with xanthoma.

Authors:  Andrii Dinets; Dmytro Unukovych; Vasyl Khrapach; Olga Zakhartseva; Volodymyr Sulik; Edgar Kaminskyi; Olexandr Khrapach; Ani Meloyan; Lubov Zakhartseva; Volodymyr Mishalov
Journal:  Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2016-03-11

Review 6.  What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Alec Knight; John Phillips; Elias Mossialos; Peter Littlejohns; Anne Schilder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Squamous Cell Carcinoma as a Result of Likely Industrial Grade Ruptured Poly Implant Prosthèse Silicone Buttock Implants.

Authors:  Juan P Camacho; Miguel Obaíd; Camilo Bustos; Wilfredo Calderón; Juan J Lombardi; Rodrigo Subiabre; Kenneth Guler; Francisca Correa
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2020-07-06

8.  Comparison of the Explantation Rate of Poly Implant Prothèse, Allergan, and Pérouse Silicone Breast Implants within the First Four Years after Reconstructive Surgery before the Poly Implant Prothèse Alert by the French Regulatory Authority.

Authors:  Alexandre Leduey; Chafika Mazouni; Nicolas Leymarie; Heba Alkhashnam; Benjamin Sarfati; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Amélie Gaudin; Frédéric Kolb; Françoise Rimareix
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12

9.  Poly Implant Prothèse silicone breast implants: implant dynamics and capsular contracture.

Authors:  Y Bachour; Z C M Heinze; T S Dormaar; W G van Selms; M J P F Ritt; F B Niessen
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-06-01

10.  What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Alec Knight; Alexander W Carter; Connor Toal; Elias Mossialos; Peter Littlejohns; Anne Gm Schilder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.