We have developed an immortalized oral epithelial cell line, ROE2, from fetal transgenic rats harboring temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 large T-antigen gene. The cells grew continuously at either a permissive temperature of 33°C or an intermediate temperature of 37°C. At the nonpermissive temperature of 39°C, on the other hand, growth decreased significantly, and the Sub-G1 phase of the cell cycle increased, indicating that the cells undergo apoptosis at a nonpermissive temperature. Histological and immunocytochemical analyses revealed that ROE2 cells at 37°C had a stratified epithelial-like morphology and expressed cytokeratins Krt4 and Krt13, marker proteins for oral nonkeratinized epithelial cells. Global-scale comprehensive microarray analysis, coupled with bioinformatics tools, demonstrated a significant gene network that was obtained from the upregulated genes. The gene network contained 16 genes, including Cdkn1a, Fos, Krt13, and Prdm1, and was associated mainly with the biological process of skin development in the category of biological functions, organ development. These four genes were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the results were nearly consistent with the microarray data. It is therefore anticipated that this cell line will be useful as an in vitro model for studies such as physiological functions, as well as for gene expression in oral epithelial cells.
We have developed an immortalized oral epithelial cell line, ROE2, from fetal transgenicrats harboring temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 large T-antigen gene. The cells grew continuously at either a permissive temperature of 33°C or an intermediate temperature of 37°C. At the nonpermissive temperature of 39°C, on the other hand, growth decreased significantly, and the Sub-G1 phase of the cell cycle increased, indicating that the cells undergo apoptosis at a nonpermissive temperature. Histological and immunocytochemical analyses revealed that ROE2 cells at 37°C had a stratified epithelial-like morphology and expressed cytokeratins Krt4 and Krt13, marker proteins for oral nonkeratinized epithelial cells. Global-scale comprehensive microarray analysis, coupled with bioinformatics tools, demonstrated a significant gene network that was obtained from the upregulated genes. The gene network contained 16 genes, including Cdkn1a, Fos, Krt13, and Prdm1, and was associated mainly with the biological process of skin development in the category of biological functions, organ development. These four genes were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the results were nearly consistent with the microarray data. It is therefore anticipated that this cell line will be useful as an in vitro model for studies such as physiological functions, as well as for gene expression in oral epithelial cells.
Oral epithelial tissues form an important barrier between the tissue and the environment,
and they protect against exogenous substances and pathogens. The oral cavity contains two
types of stratified epithelia: keratinized epithelia located in the gingival and hard palate
tissues, and nonkeratinized epithelia in buccal tissues, the underside of the tongue, and
soft palate tissues. To maintain these epithelial barriers, epithelial tissues undergo
constant renewal. Oral keratinized and nonkeratinized epithelia are composed of cells that
show various differentiated phenotypes, and the progenitor cells in the basal layer give
rise to all of the epithelial cell types in the oral epithelia [32, 38]. Cell junctions including
desmosomes function as points in cell-cell and cell-basement membranes, and connect to the
keratin cytoskeleton to the cell surface. It is also well known that cytokeratins, important
components of cytoskeletons, are reliable indicators of oral epithelial cell differentiation
[32, 36,37,38]. Cytokeratins keratin 5 (Krt5) and Krt14 are expressed in basal cells in both
oral keratinized and nonkeratinized epithelia, whereas the keratin pairs Krt1/Krt10 and
Krt4/Krt13 are found in keratinized and nonkeratinized epithelia, respectively.The use of in vitro cell culture systems has been of central importance
for research into the physiology, pharmacology, and toxicology of cell lines; and such
systems function at both the cellular and molecular levels. Primary cell culture methods
have been developed for the study of oral epithelial cells [17, 46]; however, these primary cultures
contain multiple cell types with different developmental stages and are frequently invaded
by fibroblastic cells. Moreover, the proliferation activity of primary culture cells is
limited, and some variability among cultured cells from individual sources has been observed
between experiments. On the other hand, it has also been thought that cell lines are a good
tool for molecular biology, especially recombinant DNA experiments, because they are a
continuous source of readily available cells. Many oral epithelial cell lines have been
established from normal cell cultures [18] or
carcinoma cells [19, 25]. However, the genetic backgrounds of these cell lines are undefined and
unstable, and usually are lacking some of their normal properties. Immortalization of
primary cultures can be achieved directly with viral oncogenes. Either simian virus 40
(SV40) large T-antigen or its mutant temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 (tsSV40) large
T-antigen can establish continuous proliferation without a transformed phenotype in primary
culture cells [15, 16]. Previous reports demonstrated that the SV40 large T-antigen can stabilize
cell-type-specific functions in oral epithelial immortalized cell lines [9, 20]. Moreover,
transgenic (TG) mice harboring tsSV40 large T-antigen have been very useful for establishing
immortalized cell lines from many kinds of tissues including epithelia [27, 28]. Using TG
mice, several kinds of epithelial cell lines with specific functions have been developed
from kidney distal tubule [45, 54], gastric fundic mucosa [39],
gingival epithelium [12], tracheal epithelium [40], intestinal epithelium [42, 52], and epididymal epithelium
[3]. Recently, some groups, including ours, have
reported that TG rats bearing the tsSV40 large T-antigen [47] are a good source of conditionally immortalized epithelial cell lines,
including gastric fundic mucosal [43], small
intestinal [13], and tracheal epithelial cells [44].The present study was undertaken to establish an oral epithelial cell line to constitute a
continuous source of cells readily available for oral epithelial investigations using TG
rats harboring the tsSV40 large T-antigen and to characterize these cells’ biological
functions, including epithelial functions and gene expressions.
Materials and Methods
Establishment of an oral epithelial cell line and cell culture
TG rats (Wistar strain) which have a tsSV40 large T-antigen gene [pSVtsA58ori (−)-2]
[47] were obtained from PhoenixBio Co., Ltd.
(Hiroshima, Japan). The experiments were performed according to guidelines presented by
the Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Toyama.Tongues were dissected out from fetal rats (18-day-old). The tissues from underside of
tongues were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and were minced finely with
scissors. The minced tissues were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium/Ham F-12
(1:1) (DMEM/F12) medium containing 0.1% collagenase for 30 min at 37°C, and epithelial
tissues were separated from mesenchyme with the aid of forceps under a dissecting
microscope, and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS),
1% ITES (2.0 mg/l insulin, 2.0 mg/l transferrin, 0.122 mg/l ethanolamine and 9.14
µg/l sodium selenite), 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 100
unit/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 2.5 µg/ml
amphotericin B in a collagen type I-precoated culture dish for 24 h at 37°C. After 24 h,
culture temperature was lowered at a permissive temperature of 33°C, and cells attached to
the dish were cultured under the same culture condition. To remove contaminated
fibroblastic cells from the culture, dispase (25 U/ml) was added to the culture medium for
24 h. Then the cells with epithelial cell morphology were cloned by colony formation. This
procedure was repeated twice [40]. The cells were
routinely maintained in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 2% FBS, 1% ITES and 10 ng/ml EGF
in a collagen type I-precoated culture vessel at 33°C.
Anchorage-independent growth
For cell culture in soft agar, the cells were suspended in agar solution which consisted
of DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 0.3% agar, 1% ITES, 10 ng/ml EGF, and 2% FBS, layered
on a semisolid feeder layer, which differed from the agar solution in having a high agar
percentage (0.5%), and incubated at 33°C. Two weeks later, the number of colonies was
counted under a microscope [42].
Measurements of cell growth and cell cycle
The number of cells was counted by using a hematocytometer. Cell cycle was determined by
flow cytometry as described previously [7]. In
short, cells were fixed with 70% ice-cold ethanol, and subsequently treated with 0.25
mg/ml RNase A and 50 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI). The samples were run on
an Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA).
Immunocytochemistry
The cells were grown in a collagen type I-precoated eight-well chamber slide. The cells
were washed with PBS, fixed in methanol for 7 min at 25°C. The cells were incubated with
the primary antibody for 18 h at 4°C, and placed in the ChromeoTM 488-labeled
secondary antibody (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at 25°C. The fluorescence was
examined under a fluorescence microscope. Primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse
monoclonal anti-SV40 large T-antigen antibody (ab16879, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); mouse
monoclonal anti-Pcna (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) antibody (sc-56, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-cytokeratin antibody (PAN,
Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-actin antibody
(65–096, ICN ImmunoBiologicals, Lisle, IL, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-laminin antibody
(PS040, Sanbio, AM Uden, The Netherlands); rabbit polyclonal anti-collagen type IV
antibody (AB756, Millipore Co., Temecula, CA, USA); mouse monoclonal anti-E-cadherin
antibody (610182, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-connexin 43
antibody (#3512, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); normal mouse IgG
(PP54, Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA, USA); normal rabbit IgG (02–6102, Zymed
Laboratories, Inc.).
Transmission electron microscopy
For transmission electron microscopic study, cells were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in
PBS and osmicated in 1% osmium tetroxide. After dehydrated in graded aceton solution, they
were embedded in Epon 812. Ultrathin sections were stained with lead citrate and uranyl
acetate and examined with an H-7100 electron microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 75
kV.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting
The cells were washed once with PBS and scraped using a plastic policeman. Cellular
material was placed into 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 150 mM NaCl and 1%
NP-40 and homogenized by an ultrasonic disruptor. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and Western blotting were carried out as described elsewhere [21, 49]. The polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes were incubated with the primary antibody at 4°C for 18 h, and exposed
to the peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h.
Immunoreactive proteins were visualized by a luminescent image analyzer using a
chemiluminescence detection system. Primary antibodies used were as follows: rabbit
polyclonal anti-Krt4 antibody (ab51600, Abcam); mouse monoclonal anti-Krt10 antibody
(ab9025, Abcam); mouse monoclonal anti-Krt13 antibody (1C7, MUbio Products BV, Oxfordlaan,
Maastricht, The Netherlands); mouse monoclonal anti-Krt14 antibody (Millipore Co.); rabbit
monoclonal anti-Krt17/19 antibody (#3984, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.); mouse
monoclonal anti-P63 antibody (sc-8431, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); mouse monoclonal
anti-involucrin antibody (ab80530, Abcam); mouse monoclonal anti-Gapdh (glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase) antibody (MAB374, Millipore Co.).
RNA isolation
Total RNA was extracted from cells using an RNeasy Total RNA Extraction kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA, USA) along with on-column DNase I treatment. RNA quality was analyzed using
a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). RNA samples that
had RIN (RNA integrity number) values above 9.5 were considered acceptable.
Microarray and computational gene expression analyses
Microarray analysis was carried out using a GeneChip® system with a Rat Genome
230 2.0 array, which was spotted with 31,099 probe sets (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara,
CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 500 ng of total RNA was
used to synthesize cRNA with a GeneChip® 3′ IVT Express Kit (Affymetrix, Inc.).
After fragmentation, biotin-labeled cRNA was hybridized to the array at 45°C for 16 h. The
arrays were washed, stained with streptavidin-phycoerythrin, and scanned using a probe
array scanner. The obtained hybridization intensity data were analyzed using
GeneSpring® GX (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) to extract the significant genes.
To examine gene ontology, including biological processes, cellular components, molecular
functions, and gene networks, the obtained data were analyzed using Ingenuity®
Pathway Analysis tools (Ingenuity Systems, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA), a web-delivered
application that enables the identification, visualization, and exploration of molecular
interaction networks in gene expression data [1,
6].
Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on an Mx3005P real-time PCR system (Agilent
Technologies, Inc.) using SYBR PreMix ExTaq (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) or Premix Ex
Taq (for the use of TaqMan probes; Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s
protocols. The reverse transcriptase reaction was carried out with total RNA by using a
random 6 mers and an oligo dT primer. PCR primers were designed as based on the databases;
Fos (FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene; GenBank Accession No.: NM_022197, sense
primer position: 529–550, and antisense primer position: 692–673), Gapdh
(NM_017008, 775–794, and 1062–1043), Krt13 (NM_001004021, 323–342, and
464–445) and Prdm1(PR domain containing 1, with ZNF domain; NM_001107639,
341–360, and 586–567). Based on the database, the specific primers and a probe were
designed; Cdkn1a(cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; GenBank Accession
No.: U24174, sense primer position: 109–128, antisense primer position: 176–157, and probe
position: 153–174). Each mRNA expression level was normalized with respect to the mRNA
expression of Gapdh.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the means ± SDs. Differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA,
and correction for multiple comparisons was made using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
Statistically significant differences were assumed at P<0.05.
Results
Establishment of an oral epithelial cell line from TG rats
In our series of two attempts, several cell lines were developed from primary cultures of
underside epithelial tissues of tongues from feral transgenicrats harboring the mutant
oncogene. We chose a cell line, designated ROE2, on the basis of its ability to exhibit an
epithelial morphology and protein expression of epithelial cell markers. ROE2 cells had a
stable homogeneous epithelial-like morphology and maintained tight connections with
neighboring cells at either a permissive temperature of 33°C or an intermediate
temperature of 37°C (Figs. 1A and B). When the culture temperature was shifted to a nonpermissive temperature of 39°C,
the cells were significantly larger than they were at the two lower temperatures (Fig. 1C), as was also true in our previous studies
[43, 44].
A multilayered cell sheet was observed in ROE2 cells cultured for 9 days at both 33°C and
37°C but not at 39°C (Figs. 1D–F). Electron
microscopic observation confirmed that the cells cultured at 37°C for 9 days formed a
multilayered structure (Figs. 3A and B).
Fig. 1.
Effects of culture temperatures on the cell morphology, cell growth and cell cycle
in ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at a permissive temperature (33°C) followed
by culturing at an intermediate temperature (37°C) and a nonpermissive temperature
(39°C) for 0–9 days. (A–F) The cultures were examined microscopically after 3 days
(A–C) and 9 days (D–F) at different temperature conditions (33°C: A, D; 37°C: B, E;
39°C: C, F). Bar, 50 µm. (G) The number of cells was counted using
a hematocytometer. Closed circles, 33°C; closed triangles, 37°C; closed squares,
39°C. *: P<0.05 vs. culture at 33°C (Dunnett’s multiple
comparison test). (H) The cells were cultured at different temperatures for 3 days,
and then cell phase distribution in the cell cycle was monitored by using a flow
cytometer. Red columns, sub G1 phase; blue columns, G0/G1 phase; red-purple columns,
S phase; green columns, G2/M phase. *: P<0.05 vs. each control
(culture at 33°C) (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).
Fig. 3.
Transmission electron micrographs of ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at 37°C
for 9 days. (A) A low-magnification image of the semi-thin section stained with
toluidine blue. (B) Section cut perpendicular to the plane of the dish. Arrows
indicate desmosomes. (C) Higher magnification of desmosome. Bar in A, 10
µm; bar in B, 1 µm; bar in C, 0.1
µm.
Effects of culture temperatures on the cell morphology, cell growth and cell cycle
in ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at a permissive temperature (33°C) followed
by culturing at an intermediate temperature (37°C) and a nonpermissive temperature
(39°C) for 0–9 days. (A–F) The cultures were examined microscopically after 3 days
(A–C) and 9 days (D–F) at different temperature conditions (33°C: A, D; 37°C: B, E;
39°C: C, F). Bar, 50 µm. (G) The number of cells was counted using
a hematocytometer. Closed circles, 33°C; closed triangles, 37°C; closed squares,
39°C. *: P<0.05 vs. culture at 33°C (Dunnett’s multiple
comparison test). (H) The cells were cultured at different temperatures for 3 days,
and then cell phase distribution in the cell cycle was monitored by using a flow
cytometer. Red columns, sub G1 phase; blue columns, G0/G1 phase; red-purple columns,
S phase; green columns, G2/M phase. *: P<0.05 vs. each control
(culture at 33°C) (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).Expressions of nuclear, cytoskeletal, basement, and junctional proteins in ROE2
cells. (A–F) The cells were cultured at different temperatures for 3 days.
Immunocytochemical analyses of nuclear proteins, large T-antigen (A, C, E) and Pcna
(B, D, F) at 33°C (A, B), 37°C (C, D) and 39°C (E, F). (G–L) The cells were cultured
at 33°C for 3 days. Immunocytochemical analyses of cytoskeletal proteins,
cytokeratin (G) and actin (H), basement proteins, laminin (I) and collagen type IV
(J), and junctional proteins, E-cadherin (K) and connexin 43 (L). (M–P) The cells
were cultured at 33°C for 3 days. Immnocytochemical analyses of normal mouse IgG (M,
N) and normal rabbit IgG (O, P). Differential interference contrast images (DICI)
(M, O) and fluorescence images (FI) (N, P) are shown. Bar, 25
µm.Transmission electron micrographs of ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at 37°C
for 9 days. (A) A low-magnification image of the semi-thin section stained with
toluidine blue. (B) Section cut perpendicular to the plane of the dish. Arrows
indicate desmosomes. (C) Higher magnification of desmosome. Bar in A, 10
µm; bar in B, 1 µm; bar in C, 0.1
µm.
Cell growth characteristics
ROE2 cells proliferated constantly at both 33°C and 37°C, whereas growth decreased
significantly at 39°C (Fig. 1G), indicating that
cell growth is sensitive to temperature. On the other hand, large T-antigen and Pcna were
expressed in the nuclei at all temperatures tested (Figs. 2A–F). However, under the negative control conditions, no fluorescence
signals were detected in the cells treated with mouse and rabbit normal IgG at 33°C (Figs. 2M–P), and almost no signals were detected at
the higher temperatures of 37°C and 39°C (data not shown). Next, the cell-cycle
distribution was monitored by PI staining with flow cytometry. The percentages of ROE2
cells at 33°C in the sub-G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases were 3.2 ± 0.2%, 58.0 ± 1.4%, 12.0
± 0.7%, and 24.2 ± 0.7% (mean ± SD), respectively. No changes in the distribution of
cell-cycle phases were observed at 37°C. Cells cultured at 39°C showed significantly lower
percentages of G0/G1 and S phases (Fig. 1H). In
contrast, those cultured at 39°C showed marked elevation of the sub-G1 phase of the cell
cycle, a marker for apoptosis, compared to those at 33°C and 37°C; the percentage of
sub-G1 in the cell cycle at 39°C was 23.4 ± 8.4% (mean ± SD; 3.2 ± 0.2% at 33°C). These
data indicate that the nonpermissive temperature induces apoptosis.
Fig. 2.
Expressions of nuclear, cytoskeletal, basement, and junctional proteins in ROE2
cells. (A–F) The cells were cultured at different temperatures for 3 days.
Immunocytochemical analyses of nuclear proteins, large T-antigen (A, C, E) and Pcna
(B, D, F) at 33°C (A, B), 37°C (C, D) and 39°C (E, F). (G–L) The cells were cultured
at 33°C for 3 days. Immunocytochemical analyses of cytoskeletal proteins,
cytokeratin (G) and actin (H), basement proteins, laminin (I) and collagen type IV
(J), and junctional proteins, E-cadherin (K) and connexin 43 (L). (M–P) The cells
were cultured at 33°C for 3 days. Immnocytochemical analyses of normal mouse IgG (M,
N) and normal rabbit IgG (O, P). Differential interference contrast images (DICI)
(M, O) and fluorescence images (FI) (N, P) are shown. Bar, 25
µm.
ROE2 cells have been maintained in culture for approximately one year at 33°C, with
stable morphological phenotype. Moreover, when the cells were cultured in a soft agar gel
at 33°C, the cells did not show any colony-forming activity (data not shown). These data
thus demonstrated that ROE2 cells are only immortalized and not transformed. Although
immortalized cell lines by infection with the SV40 large T-antigen occasionally undergo
malignant transformation [14], no transformed cell
lines developed from the TG mice [40, 42] and rats [43, 44] that harbor tsSV40 large
T-antigen.
Expressions of marker proteins for epithelial cells
We investigated the epithelial phenotype of an established cell line. Immunocytochemical
investigations demonstrated that the cytoskeletal proteins cytokeratin and actin; basement
membrane proteins laminin and collagen type IV; and junctional complex proteins E-cadherin
and connexin 43 were detected in the ROE2 cells at 33°C (Figs. 2G–L). In addition, under electron microscopic observations,
when the cells were cut parallel to the plane of the dish, several desmosomes were
observed between the cells in the multilayered sheet of ROE2 cells (Figs. 3B, C). These results provide strong evidence that this cell
line preserves some characteristics of oral epithelial cells, as in the cases of mouse
gingival epithelial cell lines from TG mice bearing the tsSV40 large T-antigen [12], human buccal epithelial cell line SVpgC2a
transformed by SV40 large T-antigen [11], and human
oral primary epithelial cell cultures [2, 11].The assessment of the expression of different cytokeratin subtypes is very useful for
identifying cell types in oral epithelia [36, 37]. Cells of the basal layer in both oral keratinized
and nonkeratinized epithelia express Krt14, whereas Krt10 or Krt4 and Krt13 are found in
cells of the spinous layer in keratinized epithelia or the intermediate layer in
nonkeratinized epithelia, respectively. In addition, Krt19 [24] and P63 [31] are reported to
be good candidates for epidermal stem cell markers. Involucrin is used as a marker of oral
epithelial cell differentiation [32, 38]. Figure
4 shows the protein levels of cytokeratins, P63, and involucrin, as demonstrated by
Western blotting under different temperature conditions. Krt4 was expressed at all
temperature conditions, and the level was higher at 33°C than at 37°C or 39°C. The
expression levels of Krt13, Krt14, Krt17, and Krt19 were below the detection limit under
control conditions. Culturing for 9 days induced significant expression levels of Krt13,
Krt14, Krt17, and Krt19 at 33°C, 37°C, and 39°C, and remarkable elevations of these four
cytokeratins were observed in ROE2 cells at 37°C. On the other hand, Krt10 was not
expressed under any experimental conditions. The peak expression of P63 was detected at 3
days of culture, and the level gradually and time-dependently decreased under all
temperature conditions. A constant expression of involucrin was maintained throughout the
experiment under all conditions employed (Fig.
4).
Fig. 4.
Effects of culture periods and culture temperatures on protein expressions for
cytokeratins, P63 and involucrin in ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at different
temperatures for 3, 6, and 9 days. Western blot analyses were performed with
specific primary antibodies for Krt4, Krt10, Krt13, Krt14, Krt17/19, P63,
involucrin, and Gapdh. Gapdh served as a loading control. Ctr, control (day 0).
Effects of culture periods and culture temperatures on protein expressions for
cytokeratins, P63 and involucrin in ROE2 cells. The cells were cultured at different
temperatures for 3, 6, and 9 days. Western blot analyses were performed with
specific primary antibodies for Krt4, Krt10, Krt13, Krt14, Krt17/19, P63,
involucrin, and Gapdh. Gapdh served as a loading control. Ctr, control (day 0).
Global-scale gene expression and functional category analyses
To identify genes involved in ROE2 cell differentiation, global-scale gene expression
analysis was carried out using the GeneChip® system. We detected 11,264 probe
sets that were expressed in ROE2 cells cultured at 37°C for 3–9 days. The complete lists
of genes from ROE2 cell samples have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO),
a public database (an accession number: GSE44560). Expression analysis using
GeneSpring® software revealed many probe sets that were differentially
regulated by a factor of 2.0 or greater. We found a total of 1,495 probe sets; 924
upregulated and 571 downregulated. Moreover, K-means clustering, a nonhierarchical gene
clustering algorithm, was performed to generate the major patterns of gene expression
during cell differentiation. Differentially expressed probe sets were grouped in four
clusters with distinct expression profiles, designated Up-I, Up-II, Up-III, and Down-I,
which included 202, 135, 587, and 571 probe sets, respectively. The Up-I cluster contained
gradually increased probe sets whose peak expressions occurred at day 3; the Up-II cluster
contained increased probe sets whose basal expression levels at day 0 were very low. The
expression levels of probe sets in the Up-III and Down-I clusters gradually increased and
decreased, respectively (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Gene expression analysis. ROE2 cells were cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. K-means
clustering of the probe sets that were differentially expressed by a factor of 2.0
or greater was performed using bioinformatics analysis tools. Figures in the
parentheses indicate probe sets numbers.
Gene expression analysis. ROE2 cells were cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. K-means
clustering of the probe sets that were differentially expressed by a factor of 2.0
or greater was performed using bioinformatics analysis tools. Figures in the
parentheses indicate probe sets numbers.Functional category analyses of differentially expressed probe sets in each cluster were
conducted by using the Ingenuity® Pathways Knowledge Base. The top biological
function and associated genes in each cluster are summarized in Table 1. The top biological function in the upregulated gene cluster Up-I was amino
acid metabolism, which was functionally annotated with the synthesis of amino acids and
included 7 genes. In the downregulated gene cluster Down-I, the top biological function
was cellular movement, which was functionally annotated with the invasion of cells and
included 37 genes. Furthermore, the top biological function, organ development, which was
functionally annotated with skin development, was observed in both upregulated clusters
Up-II and Up-III. Nine genes, including Krt13, Lor
(loricrin), and Prdm1; and 23 genes, including Cdkn1a,
Egfr (epidermal growth factor receptor), and Tgm
(transglutaminase)1, were associated with skin development in clusters
Up-II and Up-III, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
The top biological function and associated genes in each cluster
Cluster
Category
Functional annotation
(P-value)
Molecules (numbers)
Up-I
Amino acid metabolism
Synthesis of amino acids (7.05E-06)
Asns, Cth,
Egr1, Gch1, Phgdh, Pycr1, Slc1a3 (7)
Up-II
Organ development
Skin development (1.34E-05)
Abhd5, Asprv1, Elovl4, Grhl3, Krt1, Krt13,
Krt15, Lor, Prdm1 (9)
To define the molecular mechanism underlying cell differentiation induced by culturing at
37°C, we performed gene network analysis on upregulated genes belonging to clusters Up-II
and Up-III using the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base. We found a significant gene
network, D, which included Cdkn1a, Egfr,
Fos, Krt13, and Prdm1(a total of 16
genes). Interestingly, almost all genes in the gene network D were associated with skin
development (functions annotation) in the category of biological functions (organ
development) (Fig. 6). To verify the results of the microarrays, we performed a real-time quantitative
PCR assay. Four genes–Cdkn1a, Fos,
Krt13, and Prdm1–were selected from the genes that
belonged to the gene network and were upregulated by culturing at 37°C for 3–9 days. As
shown in Fig. 7, the expression levels of the four genes were significantly upregulated in the case
of cell culturing at 37°C. This was almost comparable to the results of microarray
analysis.
Fig. 6.
The gene network D. ROE2 cells were cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. Probe sets that
were up-regulated in the clusters Up-II and Up-III were analyzed by the Ingenuity
Pathway analysis software. The network is displayed graphically as nodes (genes) and
edges (the biological relationships between the nodes). Nodes and edges are
displayed various shapes and labels that present the functional class of genes and
the nature of the relationship between the nodes, respectively.
Fig. 7.
Verification of microarray results by real-time quantitative PCR. The cells were
cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed. Each
expression level was normalized by Gapdh.
(A)Cdkn1a; (B)Fos; (C)Krt13;
(D)Prdm1. The data represent means ± SDs from 4 different
experiments. *P<0.05 vs. control (day 0) (Dunnett’s multiple
comparison test).
The gene network D. ROE2 cells were cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. Probe sets that
were up-regulated in the clusters Up-II and Up-III were analyzed by the Ingenuity
Pathway analysis software. The network is displayed graphically as nodes (genes) and
edges (the biological relationships between the nodes). Nodes and edges are
displayed various shapes and labels that present the functional class of genes and
the nature of the relationship between the nodes, respectively.Verification of microarray results by real-time quantitative PCR. The cells were
cultured at 37°C for 0–9 days. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed. Each
expression level was normalized by Gapdh.
(A)Cdkn1a; (B)Fos; (C)Krt13;
(D)Prdm1. The data represent means ± SDs from 4 different
experiments. *P<0.05 vs. control (day 0) (Dunnett’s multiple
comparison test).
Discussion
TG mice harboring tsSV40 large T-antigen have been found to be a good source for
establishing immortalized cell lines from many kinds of tissues including epithelia [27, 28]. The aim
of this study, the development of an oral epithelial cell line with differentiation
potential, was achieved by using TG rats. Interestingly, rat oral epithelial cell line ROE2,
which was established here, retained some functions of stratified oral epithelial cells and
differentiated into nonkeratinized epithelial cells under standard culture conditions. To
our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the establishment of an oral epithelial
cell line having differentiation potential from TG rats harboring the mutant oncogene.It has been well known that wild-type SV40 large T-antigen induces immortalization by
inactivating functions of several tumor suppressor molecules, such as p53 and retinoblastoma
binding protein (pRb) [41]. In contrast, mutant
tsSV40 large T-antigen can form complexes with p53 and pRb at permissive temperatures but at
nonpermissive temperatures is inactivated and degraded and releases p53 or pRb from the
complexes [16, 55]. A variety of the cell lines developed from TG animals harboring the mutant
oncogene exhibited temperature-dependent growth characteristics, and nonpermissive
temperatures induced cell differentiation or cell growth arrest accompanying apoptosis
[28]. In the present study, although ROE2 cells
showed temperature-sensitive growth, the expression levels of large T-antigen and Pcna, a
valuable marker for S-phase cells, did not decrease in the nonpermissive temperature of
39°C. However, cell-cycle analysis demonstrated that the culture at 39°C significantly
increased in the sub-G1 phase, a marker for apoptosis, but decreased in the S-phase in the
cell cycle. We thought the immortalization and growth of ROE2 cells were due to the
expression of tsSV40 large T-antigen. However, further studies are needed to investigate the
molecular mechanism underling nonpermissive temperature-induced apoptosis in ROE2 cells.In cell lines established from TG animals harboring the tsSV40 large T-antigen, their
differentiated phenotypes were usually observed under nonpermissive temperature conditions
at 39°C [28]. However, when apoptosis is induced by
the culture at 39°C, differentiated phenotypes are reported to be detected even at the
intermediate temperatures of 37°C or the permissive temperatures of 33°C [12, 48]. In line
with these findings, the most differentiated phenotype of ROE2 cells was found to be
long-term culture at 37°C. Under the differentiated conditions, ROE2 cells expressed not
only superficial and intermediate layer cell markers, Krt4, Krt13, and involucrin, but also
basal layer cell markers, Krt14, Krt19, and P63 [31,
32, 38],
indicating that the culture may include several transit cells that show distinct types of
cell differentiation.To clarify the molecular mechanism underling the differentiation of ROE2 cells at 37°C, we
further performed global-scale comprehensive microarray and computational gene expression
analyses. The results showed changes in gene expression and gene network D involved in the
cell differentiation of ROE2 cells. Very interestingly, the top biological function in both
upregulated gene clusters Up-II and Up-III was the biological process of skin development.
Among a total of 32 genes identified (9 + 23; Table
1), 28 genes (the exceptions being Prdm1,
Calml5(calmodulin-like 5), Foxe1(forkhead box E1), and
Tfap2a (transcription factor AP-2 alpha)) were also found to be expressed
in normal differentiated keratinocytes in mouse oral mucosa [53], the gene expression data of which were obtained from GEO, an accession number
of GSE28035. In these genes, it has been reported that Evpl (envoplakin)
[35], Scel (sciellin) [4], Tgm1 [8], and Tgm3 [56] are
involved in the development of epidermis. In this study, of particular interest was our
identification of the skin development-associated gene network D, whose core contains
Cdkn1a, Egfr, and Fos derived from
upregulated genes in cluster Up-II or Up-III. Krt13 is a marker protein for oral
nonkeratinized and differentiated epithelial cells [32, 38], and is shown to play an important
role in epidermal development. Richard et al. [33] presented evidence to support the notion that morphological changes,
including epithelial thickening, parakeratosis, and extensive vacuolization of the
suprabasal keratinocytes in the upper spinous layers occur in epidermal disorders due to
Krt13 defects. Previous findings also demonstrated that Prdm1 [23] and Cdkn1a [30] are involved
in the terminal differentiation of epidermis. Moreover, as regards the gene network D,
relationships have been reported between Fos and Krt13, and between both of these and Cdkn1a
and Prdm1; namely, the downregulation of Krt13 was observed in skin keratinocytes of
Fos-deficientmice [5], Cdkn1a increased the
phosphorylation of Fos [26], and Fos elevated the
expression level of Prdm1 [29]. According to previous
findings, Lor [22], Tfap2a [50], and Ugcg (UDP-glucose ceramide glucosyltransferase) [51] are involved in keratinocyte differentiation. Bmp4
(bone morphogenetic protein 4) [10] and Ccnd2 (cyclin
D2) [34] are also reported to positively regulate
epidermis morphology in experimental animal models. The differentially expressed genes
and/or acted within the gene network D identified here are likely to be involved in the
differentiation of ROE2 cells. However, the interaction between gene expression and cell
differentiation is as yet not fully understood. Important questions need to be elucidated in
further investigations.Recently, Alaminos et al. [2]
reported that the expression of 1,085 genes was upregulated at least 10-fold in stratified
differentiated cells in comparison to monolayer undifferentiated cells formed using human
normal oral epithelial cells on fibrin-agarose scaffolds. For the expression profiles of
these 1,085 genes, we identified 44 genes involved in skin development by using
computational gene expression analysis tools. In 44 genes, only 6
genes–Calml5, Celsr1 (cadherin, EGF LAG seven-pass
G-type receptor 1), Evpl, Krtdap (keratinocyte
differentiation associated protein), Scel, and
Spink5 (serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 5)–were upregulated under
differentiated conditions in both ROE2 cells and the human oral culture system [2]. This discrepancy may be due to cell-type differences
and different experimental conditions, such as culture conditions, or to differences in the
analytical methods used.In conclusion, rat oral epithelial cell line ROE2 having specific functions would be useful
as an in vitro model for studies of physiological functions and of gene
expression in oral epithelial cells. In addition, the established cell line may offer an
alternative to experiments using living animals, thereby providing a solution to ethical
issues.
Authors: Moritz Durchdewald; Juan Guinea-Viniegra; Daniel Haag; Astrid Riehl; Peter Lichter; Meinhard Hahn; Erwin F Wagner; Peter Angel; Jochen Hess Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Erna Magnúsdóttir; Sergey Kalachikov; Koji Mizukoshi; David Savitsky; Akemi Ishida-Yamamoto; Andrey A Panteleyev; Kathryn Calame Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 11.205