Literature DB >> 24521681

Patterns of failure after proton therapy in medulloblastoma; linear energy transfer distributions and relative biological effectiveness associations for relapses.

Roshan V Sethi1, Drosoula Giantsoudi2, Michael Raiford2, Imran Malhi2, Andrzej Niemierko2, Otto Rapalino3, Paul Caruso3, Torunn I Yock2, Nancy J Tarbell2, Harald Paganetti2, Shannon M MacDonald4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The pattern of failure in medulloblastoma patients treated with proton radiation therapy is unknown. For this increasingly used modality, it is important to ensure that outcomes are comparable to those in modern photon series. It has been suggested this pattern may differ from photons because of variations in linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE). In addition, the use of matching fields for delivery of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may influence patterns of relapse. Here we report the patterns of failure after the use of protons, compare it to that in the available photon literature, and determine the LET and RBE values in areas of recurrence. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of patients with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) between 2002 and 2011. We documented the locations of first relapse. Discrete failures were contoured on the original planning computed tomography scan. Monte Carlo calculation methods were used to estimate the proton LET distribution. Models were used to estimate RBE values based on the LET distributions.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were followed for a median of 38.8 months (range, 1.4-119.2 months). Of the patients, 16 experienced relapse. Relapse involved the supratentorial compartment (n=8), spinal compartment (n=11), and posterior fossa (n=5). Eleven failures were isolated to a single compartment; 6 failures in the spine, 4 failures in the supratentorium, and 1 failure in the posterior fossa. The remaining patients had multiple sites of disease. One isolated spinal failure occurred at the spinal junction of 2 fields. None of the 70 patients treated with an involved-field-only boost failed in the posterior fossa outside of the tumor bed. We found no correlation between Monte Carlo-calculated LET distribution and regions of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common site of failure in patients treated with protons for medulloblastoma was outside of the posterior fossa. The most common site for isolated local failure was the spine. We recommend consideration of spinal imaging in follow-up and careful attention to dose distribution in the spinal junction regions. Development of techniques that do not require field matching may be of benefit. We did not identify a direct correlation between lower LET values and recurrence in medulloblastoma patients treated with proton therapy. Patterns of failure do not appear to differ from those in patients treated with photon therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24521681     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Extension of TOPAS for the simulation of proton radiation effects considering molecular and cellular endpoints.

Authors:  Lisa Polster; Jan Schuemann; Ilaria Rinaldi; Lucas Burigo; Aimee L McNamara; Robert D Stewart; Andrea Attili; David J Carlson; Tatsuhiko Sato; José Ramos Méndez; Bruce Faddegon; Joseph Perl; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Henning Willers; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Local failure in parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma correlates with poor response to induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew M Ladra; Henry C Mandeville; Andrzej Niemierko; Timothy P Padera; Alison M Friedmann; Shannon M MacDonald; David Ebb; Yen-Lin Chen; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Nathan E Millard; Kevin C De Braganca
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Clinical Outcomes Among Children With Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma Treated With Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy: A Comparison of Disease Control and Overall Survival.

Authors:  Bree R Eaton; Natia Esiashvili; Sungjin Kim; Elizabeth A Weyman; Lauren T Thornton; Claire Mazewski; Tobey MacDonald; David Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.