Literature DB >> 24519620

Complications in hip arthroscopy: necessity of supervision during the learning curve.

Florian Dietrich1, Christian Ries, Claus Eiermann, Wolfgang Miehlke, Christian Sobau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the learning curve of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) could be verified by analyzing the complication rate of this procedure. Additionally, it was investigated whether supervision by an experienced surgeon leads to a steeper learning curve (lower number of complications) when starting to perform arthroscopic FAI treatment.
METHODS: The complications occurring in 317 consecutive patients treated with the sole diagnosis of FAI were analyzed. 256 patients (collective A) were treated by surgeon A between June 2005 and January 2010. Sixty-one patients (collective B) were treated by surgeon B between August 2008 and December 2009. From January to June 2008, surgeon B performed many hip arthroscopies under supervision of surgeon A. Complications were recorded in a central complication register. Statistic analysis of the complication rates was performed using Fischer's exact T test.
RESULTS: Subdividing collective A chronologically into thirds a significant decline of complications (p = 0.0044) was found with growing experience of the surgeon. Comparing the first 61 patients of both surgeons a significantly lower complication rate was discovered in the patients of surgeon B (p = 0.0375). In total there were 21 complications (6.6 %; CI 4.4-9.9 %). The observed complication rate was 7.0 % in collective A and 4.9 % in collective B.
CONCLUSION: The learning curve can be comprehended by the distribution of complications in collective A. Having spent 6 months performing under supervision of surgeon A, surgeon B has a lower complication rate than surgeon A when comparing the first 61 patients each surgeon operated on. This implies that surgeon B benefits from the experience of surgeon A. According to this analysis, beginners in arthroscopic FAI treatment should be taught at a specialized centre to reduce the number of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519620     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2893-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases.

Authors:  M T Clarke; A Arora; R N Villar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve function with radiographic arthritis?

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; M Russell Giveans; Mehul Taylor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Paul E Beaulé; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgical hip dislocation versus hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: clinical and morphological short-term results.

Authors:  Patrick O Zingg; Erika J Ulbrich; Tobias C Buehler; Fabian Kalberer; Vaughan R Poutawera; Claudio Dora
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Efficacy of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Naveen Arora; Thomas M Best; Xueliang Pan; Thomas J Ellis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Frank M McCormick; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anil K Gupta; Thomas J Ellis; Bernard R Bach; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Erika J Ulbrich; David W Stoller; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 8.  Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Itamar B Botser; Thomas W Smith; Rima Nasser; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Norman Espinosa; Martin Beck; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  J W Thomas Byrd; Kay S Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  [Virtual arthroscopy : Gaming or training concept of the future].

Authors:  Stephan Reppenhagen; Manuel Weißenberger; Thomas Barthel; Maximilian Rudert; Hermann Anetzberger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Hip arthroscopy complications regarding surgery and early postoperative care: retrospective study and review of literature.

Authors:  R Seijas; O Ares; A Sallent; X Cuscó; P Álvarez-Díaz; R Tejedor; R Cugat
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-07

3.  Hip arthroscopy learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study.

Authors:  Jakub Kautzner; Petr Zeman; Andrej Stančák; Vojtěch Havlas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis.

Authors:  G Cunningham; S Benchouk; O Kherad; A Lädermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Evaluating healthcare resource utilization and outcomes for surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Darren de Sa; Nolan S Horner; Austin MacDonald; Nicole Simunovic; Gerard Slobogean; Marc J Philippon; Etienne L Belzile; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  What the Papers Say.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2014-06-12

7.  Psoas tunnel perforation-an unreported complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Eilish O'Sullivan; Ernest L Sink; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 8.  Surgical innovation and safety: femoroacetabular impingement and the IDEAL collaborative framework.

Authors:  Cara Beth Lee
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-12-03

9.  Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Edward C Beck; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Laura M Krivicich; Philip Malloy; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Kyleen Jan; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 10.  Bilateral hip arthroscopy for treating femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mithilesh V Kumar; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Jeffrey Kay; Nicole Simunovic; Michael J Huang; Thomas H Wuerz; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.