PURPOSE: To assess corneal stiffening with supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) technology in an experimental model of iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking (I-CXL). METHODS: Six rabbits underwent full, central I-CXL in one eye. The contralateral eye served as control. In vivo iontophoresis was used for 10 minutes to perform transepithelial delivery of riboflavin prior to UV-A irradiation. Accelerated UV-A protocol was applied for 9 minutes with a 10-mW/cm(2) irradiance. Animals were killed and both treated and control corneas were then immediately mounted on a corneal artificial anterior chamber and internal pressure was varied from 15 to 50 mm Hg in 5-mm Hg increments. Swelling was evaluated via central corneal thickness measurements. Ex vivo inflation tests were monitored using SSI technology that provides real-time mapping of the corneal elasticity. RESULTS: Corneal yellowing of the central 9-mm diameter area was clearly visible in the iontophoresis area of all treated eyes. Elasticity versus internal pressure revealed significant differences of the change in elasticity coefficient with pressure between I-CXL-treated and control corneas with a mean slope that was 27.1 and 16.9 kPa/mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.029). Differences in elasticity at individual pressure levels between groups were statistically significant above 40 mm Hg (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular pressure variations were the most important limitations for in vivo stiffness monitoring with SSI because stiffness is a function of internal pressure. Supersonic shear wave imaging succeeded in comparing corneas that underwent I-CXL by performing ex vivo inflation tests where pressure was controlled. Iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking corneas exhibited increased resistance to pressure rise, indicating stiffening. In vivo I-CXL and ex vivo SSI is an interesting model to evaluate the sole effect of photopolymerization occurring in the CXL process close to physiological conditions.
PURPOSE: To assess corneal stiffening with supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) technology in an experimental model of iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking (I-CXL). METHODS: Six rabbits underwent full, central I-CXL in one eye. The contralateral eye served as control. In vivo iontophoresis was used for 10 minutes to perform transepithelial delivery of riboflavin prior to UV-A irradiation. Accelerated UV-A protocol was applied for 9 minutes with a 10-mW/cm(2) irradiance. Animals were killed and both treated and control corneas were then immediately mounted on a corneal artificial anterior chamber and internal pressure was varied from 15 to 50 mm Hg in 5-mm Hg increments. Swelling was evaluated via central corneal thickness measurements. Ex vivo inflation tests were monitored using SSI technology that provides real-time mapping of the corneal elasticity. RESULTS: Corneal yellowing of the central 9-mm diameter area was clearly visible in the iontophoresis area of all treated eyes. Elasticity versus internal pressure revealed significant differences of the change in elasticity coefficient with pressure between I-CXL-treated and control corneas with a mean slope that was 27.1 and 16.9 kPa/mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.029). Differences in elasticity at individual pressure levels between groups were statistically significant above 40 mm Hg (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular pressure variations were the most important limitations for in vivo stiffness monitoring with SSI because stiffness is a function of internal pressure. Supersonic shear wave imaging succeeded in comparing corneas that underwent I-CXL by performing ex vivo inflation tests where pressure was controlled. Iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking corneas exhibited increased resistance to pressure rise, indicating stiffening. In vivo I-CXL and ex vivo SSI is an interesting model to evaluate the sole effect of photopolymerization occurring in the CXL process close to physiological conditions.
Authors: Anna E Knight; Samantha L Lipman; Thammathida Ketsiri; Lisa D Hobson-Webb; Kathryn R Nightingale Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Suhyun Park; Heechul Yoon; Kirill V Larin; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Salavat R Aglyamov Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Rohit Shetty; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Purnima Srivatsa; Chaitra Jayadev; Natasha Pahuja; Mukunda C Akkali; Abhijit Sinha Roy Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 3.411