Literature DB >> 16808614

Retrospective assessment of radiation exposure using biological dosimetry: chromosome painting, electron paramagnetic resonance and the glycophorin a mutation assay.

R A Kleinerman1, A A Romanyukha, D A Schauer, J D Tucker.   

Abstract

Biological monitoring of dose can contribute important, independent estimates of cumulative radiation exposure in epidemiological studies, especially in studies in which the physical dosimetry is lacking. Three biodosimeters that have been used in epidemiological studies to estimate past radiation exposure from external sources will be highlighted: chromosome painting or FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), the glycophorin A somatic mutation assay (GPA), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) with teeth. All three biodosimeters have been applied to A-bomb survivors, Chernobyl clean-up workers, and radiation workers. Each biodosimeter has unique advantages and limitations depending upon the level and type of radiation exposure. Chromosome painting has been the most widely applied biodosimeter in epidemiological studies of past radiation exposure, and results of these studies provide evidence that dose-related translocations persist for decades. EPR tooth dosimetry has been used to validate dose models of acute and chronic radiation exposure, although the present requirement of extracted teeth has been a disadvantage. GPA has been correlated with physically based radiation dose after high-dose, acute exposures but not after low-dose, chronic exposures. Interindividual variability appears to be a limitation for both chromosome painting and GPA. Both of these techniques can be used to estimate the level of past radiation exposure to a population, whereas EPR can provide individual dose estimates of past exposure. This paper will review each of these three biodosimeters and compare their application in selected epidemiological studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808614     DOI: 10.1667/RR3273.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  In Vivo EPR For Dosimetry.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Greg Burke; M Coey; Eugene Demidenko; Ruhong Dong; Oleg Grinberg; James Hilton; Akinori Iwasaki; Piotr Lesniewski; Maciej Kmiec; Kai-Ming Lo; R Javier Nicolalde; Andres Ruuge; Yasuko Sakata; Artur Sucheta; Tadeusz Walczak; Benjamin B Williams; Chad Mitchell; Alex Romanyukha; David A Schauer
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Roberto J Nicolalde; Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Alla Shapiro; Albert L Wiley; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Q-band electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry in tooth enamel: biopsy procedure and determination of dose detection limit.

Authors:  Alex Romanyukha; François Trompier; Ricardo A Reyes
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Advances in a framework to compare bio-dosimetry methods for triage in large-scale radiation events.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Eugene Demidenko; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research.

Authors:  Alesia Ivashkevich; Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Roger F Martin; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Current use and future needs of biodosimetry in studies of long-term health risk following radiation exposure.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Ruth Kleinerman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Individual radiosensitivity and its relevance to health physics.

Authors:  Kara Schnarr; Ian Dayes; Jinka Sathya; Douglas Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.