Literature DB >> 24518862

Individual differences in the forced swimming test and neurochemical kinetics in the rat brain.

Andrey Sequeira-Cordero1, Andrea Mora-Gallegos2, Patricia Cuenca-Berger3, Jaime Fornaguera-Trías4.   

Abstract

Individual differences in the forced swimming test (FST) could be associated with differential temporal dynamics of gene expression and neurotransmitter activity. We tested juvenile male rats in the FST and classified the animals into those with low and high immobility according to the amount of immobility time recorded in FST. These groups and a control group which did not undergo the FST were sacrificed either 1, 6 or 24 h after the test. We analyzed the expression of the CRF, CRFR1, BDNF and TrkB in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and nucleus accumbens as well as norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, GABA and glutamine in the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Animals with low immobility showed significant reductions of BDNF expression across time points in both the prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens when compared with non-swim control. Moreover, rats with high immobility only showed a significant decrease of BDNF expression in the prefrontal cortex 6h after the FST. Regarding neurotransmitters, only accumbal dopamine turnover and hippocampal glutamate content showed an effect of individual differences (i.e. animals with low and high immobility), whereas nearly all parameters showed significant differences across time points. Correlational analyses suggest that immobility in the FST, probably reflecting despair, is related to prefrontal cortical BDNF and to the kinetics observed in several other neurochemical parameters. Taken together, our results suggest that individual differences observed in depression-like behavior can be associated not only with changes in the concentrations of key neurochemical factors but also with differential time courses of such factors.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDNF expression; Brain; Individual differences; Neurotransmitters; Time course

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24518862     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  33 in total

1.  Prediction of resting energy expenditure from fat-free mass and fat mass.

Authors:  K M Nelson; R L Weinsier; C L Long; Y Schutz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Modern science versus the stigma of obesity.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Friedman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Energy expenditure and subsequent nutrient intakes in overfed young men.

Authors:  S B Roberts; V R Young; P Fuss; M A Fiatarone; B Richard; H Rasmussen; D Wagner; L Joseph; E Holehouse; W J Evans
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-09

Review 5.  The fundamental flaw in obesity research.

Authors:  J T Winkler
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Food intake and energy expenditure of army recruits.

Authors:  O G Edholm; J M Adam; M J Healy; H S Wolff; R Goldsmith; T W Best
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Evaluation of long-term dietary intakes of adults consuming self-selected diets.

Authors:  W W Kim; J L Kelsay; J T Judd; M W Marshall; W Mertz; E S Prather
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  A model for the prediction of energy balance and body weight.

Authors:  P R Payne; A E Dugdale
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 1.533

9.  Imprecise control of energy intake: absence of a reduction in food intake following overfeeding in young adults.

Authors:  David A Levitsky; Eva Obarzanek; Gordana Mrdjenovic; Barbara J Strupp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-04-13

10.  Variability of appetite control mechanisms in response to 9 weeks of progressive overfeeding in humans.

Authors:  S A Jebb; M Siervo; G Frühbeck; G R Goldberg; P R Murgatroyd; A M Prentice
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stress hormone exposure reduces mGluR5 expression in the nucleus accumbens: functional implications for interoceptive sensitivity to alcohol.

Authors:  Joyce Besheer; Kristen R Fisher; Anel A Jaramillo; Suzanne Frisbee; Reginald Cannady
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Variability in Behavioral Phenotypes after Forced Swimming-Induced Stress in Rats Is Associated with Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor, Nurr1, and IL-1β in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ruiz-Sánchez; Arely M López-Ramírez; Ángel Ruiz-Chow; Minerva Calvillo; Aldo A Reséndiz-Albor; Brenda Anguiano; Patricia Rojas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Molecular Signaling Mechanisms for the Antidepressant Effects of NLX-101, a Selective Cortical 5-HT1A Receptor Biased Agonist.

Authors:  Sharon Cabanu; Fuencisla Pilar-Cuéllar; Paula Zubakina; Eva Florensa-Zanuy; Júlia Senserrich; Adrian Newman-Tancredi; Albert Adell
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.