Literature DB >> 24518560

Biofilm-degrading enzymes from Lysobacter gummosus.

Anke Gökçen1, Andreas Vilcinskas2, Jochen Wiesner1.   

Abstract

Biofilm-degrading enzymes could be used for the gentle cleaning of industrial and medical devices and the manufacture of biofilm-resistant materials. We therefore investigated 20 species and strains of the bacterial genus Lysobacter for their ability to degrade experimental biofilms formed by Staphylococcus epidermidis, a common nosocomial pathogen typically associated with device-related infections. The highest biofilm-degradation activity was achieved by L. gummosus. The corresponding enzymes were identified by sequencing the L. gummosus genome. Partial purification of the biofilm-degrading activity from an extract of extracellular material followed by peptide mass fingerprinting resulted in the identification of two peptidases (α-lytic protease and β-lytic metalloendopeptidase) that were predicted to degrade bacterial cell walls. In addition, we identified two isoforms of a lysyl endopeptidase and an enzyme similar to metalloproteases from Vibrio spp. Potential peptidoglycan-binding C-terminal fragments of two OmpA-like proteins also co-purified with the biofilm-degrading activity. The L. gummosus genome was found to encode five isoenzymes of α-lytic protease and three isoenzymes of lysyl endopeptidase. These results indicated that the extracellular digestion of biofilms by L. gummosus depends on multiple bacteriolytic and proteolytic enzymes, which could now be exploited for biofilm control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lysobacter gummosus; Staphylococcus epidermidis; biofilm; device-related infections; lytic peptidases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24518560      PMCID: PMC3979864          DOI: 10.4161/viru.27919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virulence        ISSN: 2150-5594            Impact factor:   5.882


  51 in total

Review 1.  Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials.

Authors:  Carla Renata Arciola; Davide Campoccia; Pietro Speziale; Lucio Montanaro; John William Costerton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Lytic activity of recombinant bacteriophage phi11 and phi12 endolysins on whole cells and biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Peter Sass; Gabriele Bierbaum
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Bacterial biofilms: development, dispersal, and therapeutic strategies in the dawn of the postantibiotic era.

Authors:  Maria Kostakioti; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; Scott J Hultgren
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Immobilized enzymes affect biofilm formation.

Authors:  Ana L Cordeiro; Catharina Hippius; Carsten Werner
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.461

5.  Lytic enzymes of Sorangium sp. Isolation and enzymatic properties of the alpha- and beta-lytic proteases.

Authors:  D R Whitaker
Journal:  Can J Biochem       Date:  1965-12

6.  Bacteriolytic activity and specificity of Achromobacter beta-lytic protease.

Authors:  S Li; S Norioka; F Sakiyama
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Studies on a new proteolytic enzyme from A chromobacter lyticus M497-1. I. Purification and some enzymatic properties.

Authors:  T Masaki; M Tanabe; K Nakamura; M Soejima
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1981-07-24

8.  Analysis of prepro-alpha-lytic protease expression in Escherichia coli reveals that the pro region is required for activity.

Authors:  J L Silen; D Frank; A Fujishige; R Bone; D A Agard
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of Achromobacter protease I gene.

Authors:  T Ohara; K Makino; H Shinagawa; A Nakata; S Norioka; F Sakiyama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The identification of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol as an antifungal metabolite produced by cutaneous bacteria of the salamander Plethodon cinereus.

Authors:  Robert M Brucker; Cambria M Baylor; Robert L Walters; Antje Lauer; Reid N Harris; Kevin P C Minbiole
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  9 in total

1.  A halotolerant thermostable lipase from the marine bacterium Oceanobacillus sp. PUMB02 with an ability to disrupt bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  George Seghal Kiran; Anuj Nishanth Lipton; Jonathan Kennedy; Alan D W Dobson; Joseph Selvin
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.269

2.  Extracellular riboflavin induces anaerobic biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis.

Authors:  Miriam Edel; Gunnar Sturm; Katrin Sturm-Richter; Michael Wagner; Julia Novion Ducassou; Yohann Couté; Harald Horn; Johannes Gescher
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  The Lysobacter capsici AZ78 Genome Has a Gene Pool Enabling it to Interact Successfully with Phytopathogenic Microorganisms and Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Gerardo Puopolo; Selena Tomada; Paolo Sonego; Marco Moretto; Kristof Engelen; Michele Perazzolli; Ilaria Pertot
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Lytic potential of Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533T: bacteriolytic enzymes and outer membrane vesicles.

Authors:  A S Afoshin; I V Kudryakova; A O Borovikova; N E Suzina; I Yu Toropygin; N A Shishkova; N V Vasilyeva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Differential effects of coral-giant clam assemblages on biofouling formation.

Authors:  Isis Guibert; Isabelle Bonnard; Xavier Pochon; Mayalen Zubia; Christine Sidobre; Gaël Lecellier; Véronique Berteaux-Lecellier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Phage-Derived Antibacterials: Harnessing the Simplicity, Plasticity, and Diversity of Phages.

Authors:  Bi-O Kim; Eun Sook Kim; Yeon-Ji Yoo; Hee-Won Bae; In-Young Chung; You-Hee Cho
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Comparative genomics provides insights into the potential biocontrol mechanism of two Lysobacter enzymogenes strains with distinct antagonistic activities.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Ziyu Zhang; Xuewen Xie; Yanxia Shi; Ali Chai; Tengfei Fan; Baoju Li; Lei Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Comparative genomics and metabolic profiling of the genus Lysobacter.

Authors:  Irene de Bruijn; Xu Cheng; Victor de Jager; Ruth Gómez Expósito; Jeramie Watrous; Nrupali Patel; Joeke Postma; Pieter C Dorrestein; Donald Kobayashi; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Diversity and Activity of Lysobacter Species from Disease Suppressive Soils.

Authors:  Ruth Gómez Expósito; Joeke Postma; Jos M Raaijmakers; Irene De Bruijn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.