Literature DB >> 24517865

Toward more accurate measurements of anorectal motor and sensory function in routine clinical practice: validation of high-resolution anorectal manometry and Rapid Barostat Bag measurements of rectal function.

M Sauter1, H Heinrich, M Fox, B Misselwitz, M Halama, W Schwizer, M Fried, H Fruehauf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements of anorectal function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and rectal barostat technology provide more reliable results than standard ARM with an elastic balloon; however, HR-ARM results have not been compared to ARM and standard barostat protocols are impractical in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate HR-ARM against standard ARM and standard barostat against a novel Rapid Barostat Bag (RBB) measurement and elastic balloon measurements of rectal function.
METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers (15 female, 11 male, 19-52 years) were studied. Measurements of anal function and simulated defecation were compared for 12-sensor HR-ARM and 6-sensor standard ARM using line plots from the same recording. Rectal capacity, compliance, and sensation (volume threshold) were measured by elastic balloon, standard barostat, and RBB methods using stepwise inflation of a 700-mL polyethylene bag to 40 mmHg distension by electronic barostat and handheld syringe monitored by sphygmo-manometer, respectively. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Bland-Altman plots and correlation coefficients (r) for measurements were calculated. KEY
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between HR- and standard ARM measurements (r > 0.86, <25 mmHg difference) and between standard barostat and RBB measurements of rectal capacity (r = 0.97, <25 mL difference). Correlation coefficients of threshold volumes for initial perception, urgency and discomfort were 0.37, 0.71, and 0.95, respectively. No significant correlation was present with elastic balloon measurements. Time to complete studies was shorter for HR-ARM than standard ARM and for RBB than standard barostat in historical controls. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: HR-ARM with RBB measurements of anorectal function provides quick and reasonably accurate measurements of continence function suitable for use in routine clinical practice (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01456442).
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorectal function; high-resolution anorectal manometry; rectal barostat; rectal compliance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24517865     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  22 in total

Review 1.  High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry - New Insights in the Diagnostic Assessment of Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 2.  High-resolution anorectal manometry: An expensive hobby or worth every penny?

Authors:  G Basilisco; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Management of chronic constipation in adults.

Authors:  K Krogh; G Chiarioni; W Whitehead
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Anorectal pressures measured with high-resolution manometry in healthy people-Normal values and asymptomatic pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Nicholas R Oblizajek; Sangeetha Gandhi; Mayank Sharma; Subhankar Chakraborty; Anjani Muthyala; David Prichard; Kelly Feuerhak; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

6.  Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Chakraborty; K J Feuerhak; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Management of patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Jonas Worsoe; Lilli Lundby; Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 9.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Ugo Grossi; Emma V Carrington; Adil E Bharucha; Emma J Horrocks; S Mark Scott; Charles H Knowles
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.