Literature DB >> 24515545

The "bother" of urinary incontinence.

Gerda Trutnovsky1, Daniela Ulrich, Rodrigo Guzman Rojas, Kristy Mann, Thomas Aigmueller, Hans P Dietz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient reported measures are important for the evaluation of symptom-specific bother and the distinction between different types of urinary incontinence. The aim of the study was to assess the validity of physician administered visual analogue scales (VAS) for the bother from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI).
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study based at a tertiary urogynecological unit, women attending for investigation of lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 504) were asked to indicate their subjective bother from SUI and UUI on a 10-cm VAS. Clinical assessment, including multichannel urodynamic testing and 4D translabial ultrasound was performed for clinical diagnosis. Linear regression was used to model the average increase in VAS bother score of SUI and UUI for each explanatory variable.
RESULTS: 74 % (n = 375) reported symptoms of SUI, with mean bother of 5.7 out of 10 (SD 2.8), and 73 % (n = 370) symptoms of UUI, with a mean bother of 6.5 out of 10 (SD 2.6). Bother from UUI was positively associated with the symptoms of nocturia (p < 0.0001) and frequency (p = 0.002), and the urodynamic findings of detrusor overactivity (p < 0.0001). Bother from SUI was positively related to the urodynamic diagnosis of USI (p < 0.0001) and a low abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) (p = 0.002), as well as to the ultrasound findings of cystourethrocele (p < 0.0001) and funnelling (p = 0.04). All univariate associations remained highly significant on multivariate analysis, controlling for age, BMI, parity, previous incontinence/prolapse surgery and previous hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician-administered VAS are a valid, reliable and practicable tool to measure bother related to SUI and UUI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515545     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2337-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

1.  Diagnosis of cystocele type by clinical examination and pelvic floor ultrasound.

Authors:  V Chantarasorn; H P Dietz
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything".

Authors:  Candace Y Parker-Autry; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly Kenton; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Reproducibility of instruments designed to measure subjective evaluation of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  K Bø
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994-03

4.  Discrepancy in patient and physician perception of patient's quality of life related to urinary symptoms.

Authors:  Larissa V Rodríguez; Daniel S Blander; Frederick Dorey; Shlomo Raz; Philippe Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study.

Authors:  Karin S Coyne; Chris C Sexton; Debra E Irwin; Zoe S Kopp; Con J Kelleher; Ian Milsom
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The severity of urinary incontinence in women. Comparison of subjective and objective tests.

Authors:  M I Frazer; B T Haylen; J R Sutherst
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-01

9.  Do objective urodynamic or clinical findings determine impact of urinary incontinence or its treatment on quality of life?

Authors:  Beata Stach-Lempinen; Pertti Kirkinen; Pekka Laippala; Riina Metsänoja; Erkki Kujansuu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States.

Authors:  W F Stewart; J B Van Rooyen; G W Cundiff; P Abrams; A R Herzog; R Corey; T L Hunt; A J Wein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

1.  The bother of anal incontinence and St. Mark's Incontinence Score.

Authors:  C Paka; I K Atan; H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Vaginal laxity: what does this symptom mean?

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz; Martyna Stankiewicz; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Caroline Wanderley Ferreira; Maciej Socha
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Will future doctors know enough about stress urinary incontinence to provide proper preventive measures and treatment?

Authors:  Joanna Witkoś; Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2019-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.