Literature DB >> 24514431

Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Wei Wu1, Qiang Chen, Liang-Cheng Zhang, Wen-Hua Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of sedation with dexmedetomidine in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
METHODS: Patients with ASA physical status I-II undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine or midazolam for conscious sedation. Continuous peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and numeric rating scale pain scores were recorded before, during and after the procedure. Patients completed a post-procedure satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients in the midazolam group (n = 30) experienced a significant decrease in MAP during sedation compared with pre-sedation values. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group (n = 30) had significantly higher SpO2 and RSS scores during sedation than those in the midazolam group. Overall satisfaction was higher in the dexmedetomidine group than the midazolam group. There were no clinically significant complications in either group.
CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine has a good safety profile and is an effective sedative for use in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dexmedetomidine; gastrointestinal endoscopy; sedation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24514431     DOI: 10.1177/0300060513515437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  7 in total

1.  Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative for Pediatric Procedural Sedation.

Authors:  Natalie Behrle; Esma Birisci; Jordan Anderson; Sara Schroeder; Abdallah Dalabih
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

2.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol used for drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Ufuk Kuyrukluyıldız; Orhan Binici; Didem Onk; Serap Ayhan Celik; Mumtaz Taner Torun; Edhem Unver; Adalet Ozcicek; Aysin Alagol
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Rui Sun; Ze-Bing Zheng; Ren Liao; Jin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Sole use of dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing endovenous thermal ablation for incompetent saphenous veins.

Authors:  Jin Ho Hwang; Il Soo Chang; Sang Woo Park; Won-Kyoung Kwon; Jae Joon Hwang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

5.  The effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on spinal anesthesia: comparision of different dose of dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Mi Hyeon Lee; Jae Houn Ko; Eun Mi Kim; Mi Hwa Cheung; Young Ryong Choi; Eun Mi Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-10-27

6.  Analgesic Effect and Hemodynamic Changes Due to Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl During Elective Colonoscopy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Parviz Amri; Sheyda Nahrini; Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Mohammadtaghi Hamidian; Seyedeh Fatemeh Alipour; Seyed Hossein Hamidi; Shima Rajaei; Javad Shokri-Shirvani
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-11-21

7.  Is It Time for an Expanded Role of Dexmedetomidine in Contemporary Anesthesia Practice? - A Clinician's Perspective.

Authors:  Christian Bohringer; Hong Liu
Journal:  Transl Perioper Pain Med       Date:  2018-04-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.