Literature DB >> 24513880

Diagnostic role of coronary calcium scoring in the rapid access chest pain clinic: prospective evaluation of NICE guidance.

Ajay Yerramasu1, Avijit Lahiri2, Shreenidhi Venuraju1, Alain Dumo1, David Lipkin1, S Richard Underwood3, Roby D Rakhit4, Deven J Patel5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) imaging by unenhanced computed X-ray tomography (CT) is recommended as an initial diagnostic test for patients with stable chest pain symptoms but a low likelihood (10-29%) of underlying obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) after clinical assessment. The recommendation has not previously been tested prospectively in a rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC).
METHODS: We recruited 300 consecutive patients presenting with stable chest pain to the RACPC of three hospitals. All patients underwent CAC imaging, followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with CAC ≥ 1000 Agatston units (Au) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in those with CAC <1000. Patients with 50-70% stenosis on CTCA underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) while those with ≥ 70% stenosis underwent ICA. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥ 70% stenosis on ICA or the presence of inducible ischaemia on MPS. Patients were followed up clinically for a mean of 17 (SD 6) months.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 60.6 (SD 9.6) years and 48% were males. Obstructive CAD was found in 56 (19%) patients, of whom 42 (14%) underwent revascularization. CAC was zero in 131 (44%) patients, of whom two (1.5%) had obstructive CAD and one (0.8%) underwent revascularization. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of CAC ≥ 1 for detection of obstructive CAD were 96, 53, 32, and 98%, respectively. None of the 57 patients with low pre-test probability of CAD and zero CAC had obstructive CAD or suffered a cardiovascular event during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Patients with stable chest pain symptoms but a low likelihood of CAD can safely be diagnosed as not having obstructive CAD in the absence of detectable coronary calcification by unenhanced CT. Patients with CAC >400 Au have a high prevalence of obstructive CAD and further investigation with ICA or functional imaging may be warranted rather than CTCA. These findings support NICE guidance for the investigation of stable chest pain. ClinicalTrials gov identifier: NCT01464203. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD diagnosis; CT coronary angiography; Coronary calcium; Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; NICE chest pain guidance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24513880     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between carotid atherosclerosis and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic diabetic patients: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Anand Jeevarethinam; Shreenidhi Venuraju; Alain Dumo; Sherezade Ruano; Vishal S Mehta; Miranda Rosenthal; Devaki Nair; Mark Cohen; Daniel Darko; Avijit Lahiri; Roby Rakhit
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  How to Utilize Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Hyung-Yoon Kim; Jin-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-12-30

3.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Determination of Presence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Maryam Moradi; Shadi Nouri; Ali Nourozi; Danial Golbidi
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-25

4.  Calcium scoring: a personalized probability assessment predicts the need for additional or alternative testing to coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Judit Simon; Lili Száraz; Bálint Szilveszter; Alexisz Panajotu; Ádám Jermendy; Andrea Bartykowszki; Melinda Boussoussou; Borbála Vattay; Zsófia Dóra Drobni; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Márton Kolossváry
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Moniek Y Koopman; Robert T A Willemsen; Pim van der Harst; Rykel van Bruggen; Jan Willem C Gratama; Richard Braam; Peter M A van Ooijen; Carine J M Doggen; Geert-Jan Dinant; Bas Kietselaer; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2022-01-26

6.  Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.

Authors:  Moniek Y Koopman; Jorn J W Reijnders; Robert T A Willemsen; Rykel van Bruggen; Carine J M Doggen; Bas Kietselaer; Martijn J Oude Wolcherink; Peter M A van Ooijen; Jan Willem C Gratama; Richard Braam; Matthijs Oudkerk; Pim van der Harst; Geert-Jan Dinant; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Visually estimated coronary artery calcium score improves SPECT-MPI risk stratification.

Authors:  Cvetan Trpkov; Alexei Savtchenko; Zhiying Liang; Patrick Feng; Danielle A Southern; Stephen B Wilton; Matthew T James; Erin Feil; Ilias Mylonas; Robert J H Miller
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-19

8.  The value of coronary artery calcium score assessed by dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for predicting presence and severity of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Alireza Almasi; Hamidreza Pouraliakbar; Ahmad Sedghian; Mohammad Ali Karimi; Ata Firouzi; Mahmood Tehrai
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.