| Literature DB >> 24511319 |
Hong Zhen1, Yifei Zhang1, Zhijia Fang2, Zhiwei Huang2, Chongge You3, Ping Shi1.
Abstract
Toona sinensis and Moschus are two herb materials used in traditional Chinese medicine, most commonly for their various biological activities. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effect of three decoctions from Toona sinensis, Moschus, and Toona sinensis and Moschus in combination on cell growth in several normal and cancer cell lines by cell viability assay. The results showed that the combined decoction exhibited the strongest anticancer effects, compared to two single decoctions. The observations indicated that the combined decoction did not induce cell apoptosis and autophagy in HeLa cells by fluorescence microscopy. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the combined decoction arrested HeLa cell cycle progression in S-phase. After the decoction incubation, among 41 cell cycle related genes, eight were reduced, while five were increased in mRNA levels by real-time PCR assay. Western blotting showed that there were no apparent changes of protein levels of Cyclin E1, while P27 expression significantly declined and the levels of CDC7 and CDK7 obviously increased. The data suggest that the RB pathway is partially responsible for the decoction-induced S-phase cell cycle arrest in HeLa cells. Therefore, the combined decoction may have therapeutic potential as an anticancer formula for certain cancers.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24511319 PMCID: PMC3910463 DOI: 10.1155/2014/121276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of the Toona sinensis and Moschus decoction on the mRNA expression of 41 cell cycle related genes. HeLa cells were treated with 50 µg/mL of the decoction for 24 h. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (for each group, n = 3).
| No. | Symbol | Gene name | Accession no. | Fold change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCNA1 | Cyclin A1 | NM_003914 | 0.47* |
| 2 | CCNA2 | Cyclin A2 | NM_001237 | 1.76 |
| 3 | CCNB1 | Cyclin B1 | NM_031966 | 1.79 |
| 4 | CCND1 | Cyclin D1 | NM_053056 | 0.26* |
| 5 | CCND2 | Cyclin D2 | NM_001759 | 0.02* |
| 6 | CCND3 | Cyclin D3 | NM_001760 | 0.96 |
| 7 | CCNE1 | Cyclin E1 | NM_057182 | 0.51 |
| 8 | CCNE2 | Cyclin E2 | NM_057749 | 1.07 |
| 9 | CCNH | Cyclin H | NM_001239 | 0.47* |
| 10 | CDC25A | Cell division cycle 25 homolog A ( | NM_201567 | 1.64 |
| 11 | CDC6 | Cell division cycle 6 homolog A ( | NM_001254 | 0.91 |
| 12 | CDC7 | Cell division cycle 7 homolog A ( | NM_003503 | 4.09** |
| 13 | CDK2 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 | NM_052827 | 1.01 |
| 14 | CDK4 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 | NM_000075 | 1.02 |
| 15 | CDK6 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 | NM_001259 | 2.53** |
| 16 | CDK7 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 | NM_001799 | 13.37** |
| 17 | CDKN1A | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) | NM_078467 | 1.15 |
| 18 | CDKN1B | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27, Kip1) | NM_004064 | 0.47* |
| 19 | CDKN2A | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A | NM_058197 | 0.88 |
| 20 | CDKN2B | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B (p15, inhibits CDK4) | NM_078487 | 0.88 |
| 21 | CDKN2C | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2C (p18, inhibits CDK5) | NM_078626 | 0.76 |
| 22 | E2F1 | E2F transcription factor 1 | NM_005225 | 0.96 |
| 23 | E2F2 | E2F transcription factor 2 | NM_004091 | 1.17 |
| 24 | E2F3 | E2F transcription factor 3 | NM_001949 | 2.25** |
| 25 | HDAC1 | Histone deacetylase 1 | NM_004964 | 0.70 |
| 26 | MCM2 | Minichromosome maintenance component 2 | NM_004526 | 0.47* |
| 27 | MCM3 | Minichromosome maintenance component 3 | NM_002388 | 0.87 |
| 28 | MCM4 | Minichromosome maintenance component 4 | NM_182746 | 1.13 |
| 29 | MCM5 | Minichromosome maintenance component 5 | NM_006739 | 0.92 |
| 30 | MCM6 | Minichromosome maintenance component 6 | NM_005915 | 0.85 |
| 31 | MCM7 | Minichromosome maintenance component 7 | NM_182776 | 1.31 |
| 32 | ORC1L | Origin recognition complex, subunit 1-like (yeast) | NM_004153 | 0.94 |
| 33 | ORC2L | Origin recognition complex, subunit 2-like (yeast) | NM_006190 | 1.24 |
| 34 | ORC6L | Origin recognition complex, subunit 6-like (yeast) | NM_014321 | 0.42* |
| 35 | PCNA | Proliferation cell nuclear antigen | NM_182649 | 0.87 |
| 36 | PKMYT1 | Protein kinase, membrane associated tyrosine/threonine 1 | NM_182687 | 1.13 |
| 37 | RB1 | Retinoblastoma 1 | NM_000321 | 2.30** |
| 38 | RBL1 | Retinoblastoma-like 1 (p107) | NM_183404 | 1.18 |
| 39 | SKP2 | S-Phase kinase-associated protein 2, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase | NM_032637 | 1.67 |
| 40 | TFDP1 | Transcription factor Dp-1 | NM_007111 | 1.28 |
| 41 | WEE1 | WEE 1 homolog ( | NM_003390 | 0.47* |
| 42# | B2M | Beta-2-microglobulin | NM_004048 | |
| 43# | ACTB | Beta actin | NM_001101 | |
| 44# | GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | NM_002046 | |
| 45# | HPRT1 | Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 | NM_000194 | |
| 46# | OAZ1 | Ornithine decarboxylase antizyme 1 | NM_004152 |
#The B2M, ACTB, GAPDH, HPRT1, and OAZ1 were selected as internal controls.
*Ratio < 0.5. **Ratio > 2.
**Means that “ratio > 2”.
Figure 1The effects of the three decoctions, including Toona sinensis and Moschus mixture, single Toona sinensis and Moschus, on cell viability in HeLa, SMMC-7721, NIH3T3, and QSG-7701 cells. (a) Cells were incubated without or with 25 and 50 μg/mL of the mixture decoction and the effects on growth inhibition were in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. (b) Cells were incubated without or with 25 and 50 μg/mL of the single Toona sinensis decoction. The percentage of viable cells was no less than 70% among all of the treated cells. (c) According to the weight ratio of the Toona sinensis and Moschus mixture decoction, the single Moschus concentration was set as 0.5 and 1 μg/mL. In contrast to NIH3T3 and QSG-7701 cells, HeLa and SMMC-7721 cells showed no statistical decrease in the percentage of cell viability. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (for each group, n = 3).
Figure 2The morphologic changes of HeLa cells treated with the Toona sinensis and Moschus decoction for 24 h and then were observed by fluorescence microscopy after staining with Hoechst 33258 (a) and MDC dye (b). No apoptotic body and acidic vesicles were seen. The scale was 50 μm at the bottom right corner in each picture.
Figure 3Effect of the Toona sinensis and Moschus decoction on the cell cycle distribution of HeLa cells. (a) Analysis of the various phases of the cell cycle by flow cytometry. A representative profile of cell cycle distribution in three independent experiments treated with 0, 25, and 50 μg/mL for 24 h. (b) The percentage of cell cycle distribution after the decoction treatment. Data are presented as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments at each concentration.
Figure 4Effect of the Toona sinensis and Moschus decoction on the expression of p27, CDK7, CDC7, and Cyclin E1 in HeLa cells by western blotting. GAPDH was used as the loading control.
Figure 5A scheme of the effect of the Toona sinensis and Moschus decoction on cell cycle arrest in HeLa cells. The RB pathway (CDK inhibitor-Cyc/CDK-RB-E2F3) is partially responsible for the decoctioninduced S-phase cell cycle arrest.