Literature DB >> 24510397

Outcome and treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infections: predictors of treatment success and failure.

Keishi Maruo1, Sigurd H Berven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an important complication after spine surgery. The management of SSI is characterized by significant variability, and there is little guidance regarding an evidence-based approach. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure of SSI after spine surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 225 consecutive patients with SSI after spine surgery between July 2005 and July 2010 were studied retrospectively. Patients were treated with aggressive surgical debridement and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Outcome and risk factors were analyzed in 197 patients having 1 year of follow-up. Treatment success was defined as resolution within 90 days.
RESULTS: A total of 126 (76 %) cases were treated with retention of implants. Forty-three (22 %) cases had treatment failure with five (2.5 %) cases resulting in death. Lower rates of treatment success were observed with late infection (38 %), fusion with fixation to the ilium (67 %), Propionibacterium acnes (43 %), poly microbial infection (68 %), >6 operated spinal levels (67 %), and instrumented cases (73 %). Higher rates of early resolution were observed with superficial infection (93 %), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (95 %), and <3 operated spinal levels (88 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed late infection was the most significant independent risk factor associated with treatment failure. Superficial infection and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus were predictors of early resolution.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative spine infections were treated with aggressive surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy. High rates of treatment failure occurred in cases with late infection, long instrumented fusions, polymicrobial infections, and Propionibacterium acnes. Removal of implants and direct or staged re-implantation may be a useful strategy in cases with high risk of treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510397     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-014-0545-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  30 in total

1.  Orthopedic Prosthetic Infections: Diagnosis and Orthopedic Salvage.

Authors:  Matthew G Kaufman; Jesse D Meaike; Shayan A Izaddoost
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Risk factors for implant removal after spinal surgical site infection.

Authors:  Naoya Tsubouchi; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Bungo Otsuki; Masanori Izeki; Hiroaki Kimura; Masato Ota; Takeshi Sakamoto; Akira Uchikoshi; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is Propionibacterium acnes becoming the most common bacteria in delayed infections following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Authors:  Mayur P Kardile; Sukhraj S Bains; Calvin C Kuo; Todd L Lincoln; Ravi S Bains
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-02-08

4.  Treatment strategy for surgical site infection post posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Shigeko Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Nakai; Koki Hosozawa; Yudai Tanaka; Koki Kishimoto; Kosuke Sakata; Hirokazu Iwata; Seiji Okada
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  Management and outcome of spinal implant-associated surgical site infections in patients with posterior instrumentation: analysis of 176 cases.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Hickmann; Denis Bratelj; Tatiana Pirvu; Markus Loibl; Anne F Mannion; Dave O'Riordan; Tamás Fekete; Deszö Jeszenszky; Nadia Eberhard; Marku Vogt; Yvonne Achermann; Daniel Haschtmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Revisionary soft tissue reconstruction of posterior midline defects after spinal surgery-plastic reconstructive options including perforator flaps.

Authors:  Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp; Nico Leibig; Tomke Cordts; Thomas Kremer; Ulrich Kneser
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 7.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Richelle C Takemoto; Baron S Lonner; Tate M Andres; Justin J Park; Pedro A Ricart-Hoffiz; John A Bendo; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Jeffrey M Spivak; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-21

9.  The use of local vancomycin powder in degenerative spine surgery.

Authors:  Josh E Schroeder; Fredrico P Girardi; Harvinder Sandhu; Joseph Weinstein; Frank P Cammisa; Andrew Sama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  The Historical Role of the Plastic Surgeon in Spine Reconstruction.

Authors:  Annie Do; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sebastian J Winocour; Edward M Reece; Scott Holmes; David S Xu; Alexander E Ropper; Scott L Hansen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.