Literature DB >> 24510379

Elective treatment of intracranial stenosis with the balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stent: 30-day stroke rate and complications.

Patrick von Schoenfeldt1, Anna Krützelmann2, Matthias Bußmeyer3, Anastasios Mpotsaris4, Michael Rosenkranz5, Jens Fiehler6, Werner Weber1, Jan-Hendrik Buhk6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Analysis of procedural results and 30-day outcome after intracranial angioplasty and stenting (ICAS) with the balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stent system in carefully selected high-risk patients in two high-volume neurovascular centers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 92 patients scheduled for elective ICAS using Pharos Vitesse between August, 2008 and August, 2011 were included. All patients showed high-grade intracranial stenosis and recurrent ischemic events despite best medical treatment at that time. The stroke rates and complications were divided into procedural and 30-day short-term events.
RESULTS: Successful stent placement was achieved in all but one patient. Ischemic procedural complications occurred in three subjects. 30-Day complications and strokes were seen in four patients: two minor ischemic strokes, one fatal hemorrhage and one non-stroke-related death. Overall, strokes occurred in 6 out of 92 patients (6.5%, 95% CI 3.0% to 13.5%). The total stroke and death rate was 7.6% (95% CI 3.7% to 14.9%). No significant correlation with previously reported risk factors could be found, although a higher rate of ischemic strokes (four out of five) in the posterior circulation was recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intracranial stenosis who experience recurrent ischemic events despite best medical treatment, ICAS, using the balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stent, may still be considered as an individual treatment option in high-volume neurovascular centers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balloon-expandable stent; intracranial stenosis; intracranial stenting; ischemic stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510379     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

1.  Studies in intracranial stenting: we must not retire from the game of science.

Authors:  J Fiehler
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Arindam R Chatterjee; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Stenoses.

Authors:  W Reith; J Berkefeld; P Dietrich; J Fiehler; O Jansen
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Fractional Flow Assessment for the Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  ZhongRong Miao; David S Liebeskind; WaiTing Lo; LiPing Liu; YueHua Pu; XinYi Leng; LiGang Song; XiaoTong Xu; BaiXue Jia; Feng Gao; DaPeng Mo; Xuan Sun; Lian Liu; Ning Ma; Bo Wang; YiLong Wang; YongJun Wang
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Effect of a Drug-Eluting Stent vs. Bare Metal Stent for the Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial and Vertebral Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Jiang-Hua Si; Ning Ma; Feng Gao; Da-Peng Mo; Gang Luo; Zhong-Rong Miao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.086

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.