Literature DB >> 26337707

Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Stenoses.

W Reith1, J Berkefeld2, P Dietrich3, J Fiehler4, O Jansen5.   

Abstract

Stroke is one of the most frequent and most significant vascular diseases. According to estimates, 16.9 million people suffered a stroke in 2010, and over one-third of the incidents were lethal. The risk of suffering a stroke due to intracranial stenosis is between 7 and 24%. As opposed to extracranial stenoses of the internal carotid artery, there is no standardized treatment concept for intracranial stenoses. At present, treatment with a low daily dose of 100 mg aspirin is recommended by the guidelines for intracranial stenoses to additionally prevent dose-dependent gastrointestinal side effects and bleeding complications. The WINGSPAN study showed stroke rates and mortality rates amounting to 4.5% after 30 days and 7.0% after 6 months. The Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis study is a randomized, multicenter study that compared endovascular stent treatment in patients with symptomatic arteriosclerotic intracranial stenoses with intensified drug therapy. After the inclusion of 451 of 764 study patients planned initially, study recruitment was terminated prematurely because the stroke rate or mortality rate within 30 days was 14.7% in the endovascular treatment group compared with 5.8% in the drug therapy group and 20% within 12 months compared with 12.2%. Quite recently the results of a second randomized study of intracranial stents were published in the Vitesse Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Stroke Therapy study. In an analysis published by Liebeskind et al. concerning the impact of collateral vessels on the stroke risk based on data from the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease study, it was demonstrated that a sufficiently formed collateral network in patients with high-degree vascular constrictions (≥ 70%) plays a crucial role in the avoidance of strokes. If there is no system of collateral vessels or if it is insufficient, the stroke risk in the dependent vascular territory is six times higher. So far it has not yet been possible to conclusively answer the question of optimal treatment for intracranial stenoses. There is particularly need for action regarding the treatment of high-degree recurrent symptomatic stenoses, not only in light of the unfavorable prognosis but also within the scope of demographic change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracranial stenosis; SAMMPRIS study; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337707     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-015-0462-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  43 in total

1.  Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

Authors:  Elad I Levy; Aquilla S Turk; Felipe C Albuquerque; David B Niemann; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Lee Pride; Phil Purdy; Babu Welch; Henry Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; L Nelson Hopkins; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall; David J Fiorella
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Klaus Gröschel; Sonja Schnaudigel; Sara M Pilgram; Katrin Wasser; Andreas Kastrup
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Complication rates using balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses : analysis of the INTRASTENT multicentric registry.

Authors:  Wiebke Kurre; Friedhelm Brassel; Roland Brüning; Jan Buhk; Bernd Eckert; Susanna Horner; Michael Knauth; Thomas Liebig; Jana Maskova; Dirk Mucha; Vojtech Sychra; Matthias Sitzer; Michael Sonnberger; Marc Tietke; Johannes Trenkler; Bernd Turowski; Joachim Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Pierre Amarenco; Julien Bogousslavsky; Alfred Callahan; Larry B Goldstein; Michael Hennerici; Amy E Rudolph; Henrik Sillesen; Lisa Simunovic; Michael Szarek; K M A Welch; Justin A Zivin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  V Battistella; M Elkind
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs. 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jan van Gijn; Ale Algra; Jaap Kappelle; Peter J Koudstaal; Anet van Latum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial Arteries (SSYLVIA): study results.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  The technique of endovascular intracranial revascularization.

Authors:  John J Connors; Joan C Wojak; Blaine H Hoppe
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Georgios Magoufis; Odysseas Kargiotis; Georgios Papadimitropoulos; Konstantinos Vadikolias; Theodoros Karapanayiotides; John Ellul; Anne W Alexandrov; Panayiotis D Mitsias; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Use of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis who undergo stenting: Presentation of three cases.

Authors:  Yafell Serulle; Deepak Khatri; Heustein Sy; Srinivasu Yerneni; David Langer; Rafael Ortiz
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Intracranial stenting for nilotinib treatment-associated cerebrovascular stenosis in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tomohiko Ozaki; Hajime Nakamura; Nobuyuki Izutsu; Hiroaki Masaie; Jun Ishikawa; Manabu Kinoshita
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xue Wang; Kun Yang; Jing Zhang; Jichang Luo; Peng Gao; Yan Ma; Liqun Jiao; Feng Ling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.