Literature DB >> 2451037

Prostate specific antigen in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of localized prostatic cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

J E Oesterling1, D W Chan, J I Epstein, A W Kimball, D J Bruzek, R C Rock, C B Brendler, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

The usefulness of prostate specific antigen to predict final pathological stage was studied in 178 consecutive patients. Prostate specific antigen was determined preoperatively in all patients by a monoclonal immunoradiometric assay. All pathological specimens were examined for capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node involvement. Prostate specific antigen correlated directly with capsular penetration (p less than 0.002), seminal vesicle involvement (p less than 0.02) and lymph node involvement (p less than 0.05). However the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated serum antigen level on an individual basis was only 55 per cent for capsular penetration and 50 per cent for seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node involvement. With a log-linear regression model, the half-life of prostate specific antigen was calculated to be 3.15 +/- 0.09 days. From the equation PSA (t) equals PSA (2) e[-0.2197(t-2)], prostate specific antigen can be used to detect residual cancer on day t in the immediate postoperative period. With respect to long-term followup, 127 patients have been monitored for longer than 2 months postoperatively with prostate specific antigen (mean followup 2 years, range 2 months to 8.6 years). Of the 101 patients who had favorable pathological findings at operation (organ-confined cancer or capsular penetration only) 92 (91 per cent) had a followup antigen concentration in the female range (0.0 to 0.2 ng. per ml.), whereas only 5 of 26 men (19 per cent) with either seminal vesicle involvement or lymph node involvement had an antigen value that was less than 0.2 ng. per ml. All patients with a documented clinical recurrence (8 of 127, 6 per cent) had an elevated followup serum prostate specific antigen concentration. These findings suggest that preoperative levels of prostate specific antigen are not sufficiently reliable to predict final pathological stage on an individual basis in patients with early prostatic cancer, and that the antigen is a sensitive tumor marker for the detection of residual disease after radical prostatectomy and subsequent recurrence of tumor on long-term followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2451037     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42630-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  48 in total

1.  IMPORTANCE OF PROSTATIC SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE : OUR EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  G S Chopra; R K Bindal; S V Kotwal; R Rai; J R Bhardwaj
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 2.  Prostate cancer detection strategies.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Javier Hernandez; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Joseph W Basler; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  [Probability of seminal vesicle involvement in localized prostatic carcinoma. Significance in conformal radiotherapy].

Authors:  H J Feldmann; J Breul; F Zimmermann; S Wachter; T Wiegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Prostate specific antigen in urinary tract infection.

Authors:  C R Bell; S Natale; P D McInerney; J C Hammonds
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Age-specific PSA reference ranges in a group of non-urologic patients.

Authors:  A C Atalay; M I Karaman; S Güney; A Dalkiliç; A Y Müslümanoğlu; E Ergenekon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Immunophenotypic Characterization of Benign and Malignant Prostatic Lesions.

Authors:  R Lakhtakia; R Bharadwaj; V K Kumar; P Mandal; S K Nema
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

9.  Definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy does not substantially impact prognostic factor estimates.

Authors:  Angel M Cronin; Guilherme Godoy; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Hitoshi Inoue; Kensaku Nishimura; Seiji Yamaguchi; Norio Nonomura; Tsuneo Hara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.