Literature DB >> 24509458

A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.

Paola De Nardi1, Giovanni Capretti, Antonino Corsaro, Carlo Staudacher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few randomized trials have compared the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy and excisional open hemorrhoidectomy. Few studies have reported long-term results.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy compared with excisional open hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade III hemorrhoids.
DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized study registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263431). A power analysis assessed the study's sample size. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either hemorrhoidectomy or Doppler-guided hemorrhoid dearterialization plus mucopexy. The χ test, Mann-Whitney U test, Student t test, and a regression model were used, as appropriate. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive patients were treated for grade III hemorrhoids from July to November 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was postoperative pain. The secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, the resumption of social and/or working activity, patient satisfaction, and the relapse of symptoms at 1 and 24 months.
RESULTS: No major complications occurred in either group. The median visual analog scale scores for pain in the hemorrhoidectomy and Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy groups on days 1, 7, 14, and 30 were 7 vs 5.5, 3 vs 2.5, 1 vs 0, and 0 vs 0 (p> 0.05). The median work resumption day was the 22nd in the hemorrhoidectomy group and the 10th in the Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy group (p = 0.09). Patient satisfaction at 1 and 24 postoperative months, with the use of a 4-point scale, was 3 vs 4 and 4 vs 4 (p > 0.05). During the follow-up, 2 patients in the dearterialization group required ambulatory treatment, and 1 patient in each group required further surgery for symptom relapse. LIMITATIONS: Nonvalidated questionnaires were used in the follow-up. Cost analysis was not performed.
CONCLUSION: Compared with hemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization with mucopexy resulted in similar postoperative pain and morbidity, and a similar long-term cure rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509458     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

Review 1.  Haemorrhoids.

Authors:  George E Reese; Alexander C von Roon; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-29

2.  Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  P De Nardi; A M Tamburini; P G Gazzetta; M Lemma; A Pascariello; C R Asteria
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Tying up loose ends.

Authors:  K Yang; T M Connolly; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Review of Hemorrhoid Disease: Presentation and Management.

Authors:  Zhifei Sun; John Migaly
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

5.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  L Xu; H Chen; G Lin; Q Ge; H Qi; X He
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  A prospective randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization with laser (HeLP): a prospective analysis of data from a multicenter trial.

Authors:  P Giamundo; A Braini; G Calabro'; N Crea; P De Nardi; F Fabiano; M Lippa; A Mastromarino; A M Tamburini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Hemorrhoidectomy - making sense of the surgical options.

Authors:  Danson Yeo; Kok-Yang Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement.

Authors:  M Trompetto; G Clerico; G F Cocorullo; P Giordano; F Marino; J Martellucci; G Milito; M Mistrangelo; C Ratto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.