Literature DB >> 24507934

2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.

Philipp Berssenbrügge1, Nina Franka Berlin2, Günther Kebeck3, Christoph Runte2, Susanne Jung4, Johannes Kleinheinz4, Dieter Dirksen2.   

Abstract

Symmetry is a significant factor, among others, influencing the attractiveness of human faces. Hence its restoration is an essential task in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Until recently, most of the techniques to objectively quantify the facial asymmetry were based on the evaluation of two-dimensional data, i.e. photographs. These techniques are well-established in literature and have in common that several landmarks in the face are identified manually and put together in a formula to obtain a facial asymmetry value. The increasing availability of three-dimensional measuring systems offers the possibility to perform an automated 3D analysis of the facial symmetry based on a dense 3D point cloud of the facial surface. The results of this analysis are on the one hand a mirror plane, which meets best the partial symmetry of the face regarding the median sagittal plane, and on the other hand a 3D asymmetry index quantifying the overall facial asymmetry characteristics. In this paper three selected 2D analysis methods and one 3D analysis method are compared.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D analysis; 3D analysis; 3D point cloud; Facial asymmetry; Optical topometric sensor

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24507934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Kang Young Choi
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-10

2.  Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy.

Authors:  Yi-Jiao Zhao; Yu-Xue Xiong; Yong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology.

Authors:  I Y Anas; B O Bamgbose; Saleh Nuhu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-14

4.  The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Sasiwimol Sanohkan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Jaeil Kim; Youn-Hee Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Characteristics of Facial Asymmetry in Congenital Superior Oblique Palsy according to Trochlear Nerve Absence.

Authors:  Hee Kyung Yang; Sumin Jung; Taeg Keun WhangBo; Jeong-Min Hwang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effect of Ambient Lights on the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Optical Scanner for Face Scans: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Punrit Thongma-Eng; Pokpong Amornvit; Patcharawan Silthampitag; Dinesh Rokaya; Attavit Pisitanusorn
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.822

9.  Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Po-Jung Hsu; Rafael Denadai; Betty C J Pai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of Artificial Extraoral Markers on Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Dentofacial Image Integration: Smartphone Face Scan versus Stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.