Literature DB >> 24505020

Risk of recurrent gastric cancer after endoscopic resection with a positive lateral margin.

Masau Sekiguchi1, Haruhisa Suzuki1, Ichiro Oda1, Seiichiro Abe1, Satoru Nonaka1, Shigetaka Yoshinaga1, Hirokazu Taniguchi2, Shigeki Sekine3, Ryoji Kushima2, Yutaka Saito1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: After noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC), close observation is often preferred when a cancer-positive lateral margin is the only noncurative factor. However, sometimes recurrence is found during the observation period. This study aimed to examine risk factors for recurrent cancer based on the long-term clinical outcomes after noncurative ESD in which the only noncurative factor was a cancer-positive lateral margin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 3784 EGCs (3316 patients) treated by ESD between 1997 and 2010, 77 noncurative differentiated-type EGCs (75 patients) were retrospectively analyzed after meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) the only noncurative factor was a cancer-positive lateral margin; 2) close observation was selected after the ESD; and 3) > 1 year follow-up after ESD.
RESULTS: Locally recurrent cancer was found in 10 lesions within a median follow-up period of 59.8 months; no metastasis or gastric cancer-related death occurred. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence 5 years after ESD was 11.9 %. All locally recurrent cancers were mucosal differentiated-type adenocarcinomas. Multivariate analysis indicated that a cancer-positive lateral margin length of ≥ 6 mm was significantly associated with local recurrence (hazard ratio 20.8; 95 % confidence interval 5.2 % - 82.9 %; P < 0.001). The cut-off value of 6 mm was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve; the sensitivity and specificity for 5-year risk of developing local recurrence were 66.7 % and 95.6 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A cancer-positive lateral margin length of ≥ 6 mm was an independent risk factor for local recurrence, and this may be a useful criterion for selecting high-risk cases for stricter management. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24505020     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1364938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  22 in total

1.  Risk stratification and predictive risk-scoring model for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masau Sekiguchi; Ichiro Oda; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Haruhisa Suzuki; Shinji Morita; Takeo Fukagawa; Shigeki Sekine; Ryoji Kushima; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Ablation of residual gastric tumor by argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Sooyeon Oh; Sang Gyun Kim; Ji Min Choi; Eun Hyo Jin; Jee Hyun Kim; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Learning curve and clinical outcome of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainee operators.

Authors:  Masao Yoshida; Naomi Kakushima; Keita Mori; Kimihiro Igarashi; Noboru Kawata; Masaki Tanaka; Kohei Takizawa; Sayo Ito; Kenichiro Imai; Kinichi Hotta; Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinicopathological significance of orphan nuclear receptor Nurr1 expression in gastric cancer.

Authors:  J Guo; G Zu; T Zhou; J Xing; Z Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a multicenter collaborative study.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanabe; Kenji Ishido; Takayuki Matsumoto; Takashi Kosaka; Ichiro Oda; Haruhisa Suzuki; Junko Fujisaki; Hiroyuki Ono; Noboru Kawata; Tsuneo Oyama; Akiko Takahashi; Hisashi Doyama; Masaaki Kobayashi; Noriya Uedo; Kenta Hamada; Takashi Toyonaga; Fumiaki Kawara; Shinji Tanaka; Yoshikazu Yoshifuku
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Long-term Outcomes of Additional Endoscopic Treatments for Patients with Positive Lateral Margins after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tae-Se Kim; Byung-Hoon Min; Yang Won Min; Hyuk Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim; Jun Haeng Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.321

7.  Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with positive lateral resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Gwang Ha Kim; Do Youn Park; Bong Eun Lee; Tae Yong Jeon; Dae Hwan Kim; Hong Jae Jo; Geun Am Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical resection margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Geum Youb Noh; Ha Ra Ku; Youn Joo Kim; Su Cheol Park; Jin Kim; Chul Ju Han; Yu Chul Kim; Ki Young Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Superficial Epithelial Gastric Neoplasia in a Portuguese Centre.

Authors:  Rita Seara Costa; Aníbal Ferreira; Tiago Leal; Dalila Costa; Carla Rolanda; Raquel Gonçalves
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-11

10.  Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2020-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.