Literature DB >> 24504670

Methane oxidation and abundance of methane oxidizers in tropical agricultural soil (vertisol) in response to CuO and ZnO nanoparticles contamination.

Santosh Ranjan Mohanty1, Parul Rajput, Bharati Kollah, Dipanti Chourasiya, Archana Tiwari, Muneshwar Singh, A Subba Rao.   

Abstract

There is worldwide concern over the increase use of nanoparticles (NPs) and their ecotoxicological effect. It is not known if the annual production of tons of industrial nanoparticles (NPs) has the potential to impact terrestrial microbial communities, which are so necessary for ecosystem functioning. Here, we have examined the consequences of adding the NPs particularly the metal oxide (CuO, ZnO) on CH4 oxidation activity in vertisol and the abundance of heterotrophs, methane oxidizers, and ammonium oxidizers. Soil samples collected from the agricultural field located at Madhya Pradesh, India, were incubated with either CuO and ZnO NPs or ionic heavy metals (CuCl2, ZnCl2) separately at 0, 10, and 20 μg g(-1) soil. CH4 oxidation activity in the soil samples was estimated at 60 and 100 % moisture holding capacity (MHC) in order to link soil moisture regime with impact of NPs. NPs amended to soil were highly toxic for the microbial-mediated CH4 oxidation, compared with the ionic form. The trend of inhibition was Zn 20 > Zn 10 > Cu 20 > Cu 10. NPs delayed the lag phase of CH4 oxidation to a maximum of 4-fold and also decreased the apparent rate constant k up to 50 % over control. ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis (α = 0.01) revealed significant impact of NPs on the CH4 oxidation activity and microbial abundance (p < 0.0001, and high F statistics). Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that PC1 (metal concentration) rendered 76.06 % of the total variance, while 18.17 % of variance accounted by second component (MHC). Biplot indicated negative impact of NPs on CH4 oxidation and microbial abundance. Our result also confirmed that higher soil moisture regime alleviates toxicity of NPs and opens new avenues of research to manage ecotoxicity and environmental hazard of NPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504670     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3654-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  32 in total

1.  Influence of liberated silver from silver nanoparticles on nitrification inhibition of Nitrosomonas europaea.

Authors:  Tyler S Radniecki; Dylan P Stankus; Arianne Neigh; Jeffrey A Nason; Lewis Semprini
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium.

Authors:  Roberta Brayner; Roselyne Ferrari-Iliou; Nicolas Brivois; Shakib Djediat; Marc F Benedetti; Fernand Fiévet
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems.

Authors:  K M Reddy; Kevin Feris; Jason Bell; Denise G Wingett; Cory Hanley; Alex Punnoose
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Fullerene water suspension (nC60) exerts antibacterial effects via ROS-independent protein oxidation.

Authors:  Delina Y Lyon; Pedro J J Alvarez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Differential effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on methane-consuming microbes in rice field and forest soils.

Authors:  Santosh R Mohanty; Paul L E Bodelier; Virgilio Floris; Ralf Conrad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus.

Authors:  Margit Heinlaan; Angela Ivask; Irina Blinova; Henri-Charles Dubourguier; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Chao Liu; Danfeng Yang; Huashan Zhang; Zhuge Xi
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.446

8.  Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Daohui Lin; Baoshan Xing
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms.

Authors:  Nicole Jones; Binata Ray; Koodali T Ranjit; Adhar C Manna
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  Assessing the impact of copper and zinc oxide nanoparticles on soil: a field study.

Authors:  Daniel Collins; Todd Luxton; Niraj Kumar; Shreya Shah; Virginia K Walker; Vishal Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR).

Authors:  Anna Brinch; Steffen Foss Hansen; Nanna B Hartmann; Anders Baun
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  The Impact Assessment of CuO Nanoparticles on the Composition and Ultrastructure of Triticum aestivum L.

Authors:  Ildiko Lung; Ocsana Opriş; Maria-Loredana Soran; Otilia Culicov; Alexandra Ciorîță; Adina Stegarescu; Inga Zinicovscaia; Nikita Yushin; Konstantin Vergel; Irina Kacso; Gheorghe Borodi; Marcel Pârvu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.