Literature DB >> 24504441

Functional and symptom impact of trametinib versus chemotherapy in BRAF V600E advanced or metastatic melanoma: quality-of-life analyses of the METRIC study.

D Schadendorf1, M M Amonkar2, M Milhem3, K Grotzinger2, L V Demidov4, P Rutkowski5, C Garbe6, R Dummer7, J C Hassel8, P Wolter9, P Mohr10, U Trefzer11, C Lefeuvre-Plesse12, A Rutten13, N Steven14, G Ullenhag15, L Sherman2, F S Wu2, K Patel2, M Casey2, C Robert16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a randomized phase III study, trametinib prolonged progression-free survival and improved overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients' quality of life (QOL) was assessed at baseline and follow-up visits using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core QOL questionnaire.
RESULTS: In the primary efficacy population (BRAF V600E+, no brain metastases) from baseline to weeks 6 and 12, patients' global health status scores worsened by 4-5 points with chemotherapy but improved by 2-3 points with trametinib. Rapid and substantive reductions in QOL functionality (e.g. role functioning, 8-11 points at weeks 6 and 12) and symptom exacerbation (e.g. fatigue, 4-8 points; nausea and vomiting, 5 points, both at weeks 6 and 12) were observed in chemotherapy-treated patients. In contrast, trametinib-treated patients reported small improvements or slight worsening from baseline at week 12, depending on the functional dimension and symptom. The mean symptom-scale scores for chemotherapy-treated patients increased from baseline (symptoms worsened) for seven of eight symptoms at week 6 (except insomnia) and six of eight symptoms at week 12 (except dyspnea and insomnia). In contrast, at weeks 6 and 12, the mean symptom-scale scores for trametinib decreased from baseline (symptoms improved) for pain (11-12 points), insomnia (10-12 points), and appetite loss (1-5 points), whereas those for diarrhea worsened (15-16 points). Mixed-model repeated-measures analyses showed significant (P < 0.05) and/or clinically meaningful improvements (small to moderate) from baseline in favor of trametinib for global health; physical, role, and social functioning; fatigue; pain; insomnia; nausea and vomiting; constipation; dyspnea; and appetite at weeks 6 and/or 12. QOL results for the intent-to-treat population were consistent.
CONCLUSIONS: This first QOL assessment for a MEK inhibitor in metastatic melanoma demonstrated that trametinib was associated with less functional impairment, smaller declines in health status, and less exacerbation of symptoms versus chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; MEK; chemotherapy; melanoma; quality of life; trametinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504441      PMCID: PMC4433512          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

1.  Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Caroline Robert; Peter Hersey; Paul Nathan; Claus Garbe; Mohammed Milhem; Lev V Demidov; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Peter Mohr; Reinhard Dummer; Uwe Trefzer; James M G Larkin; Jochen Utikal; Brigitte Dreno; Marta Nyakas; Mark R Middleton; Jürgen C Becker; Michelle Casey; Laurie J Sherman; Frank S Wu; Daniele Ouellet; Anne-Marie Martin; Kiran Patel; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Kaasa; K Bjordal; N Aaronson; T Moum; E Wist; S Hagen; A Kvikstad
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. The Study Group on Quality of Life of the EORTC and the Symptom Control and Quality of Life Committees of the NCI of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  D Osoba; N Aaronson; B Zee; M Sprangers; A te Velde
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A quality-of-life study in high-risk (thickness > = or 2 mm) cutaneous melanoma patients in a randomized trial of 1-cm versus 3-cm surgical excision margins.

Authors:  Julia A Newton-Bishop; Clarissa Nolan; Faye Turner; Margaret McCabe; Candida Boxer; J Meirion Thomas; Gill Coombes; Roger P A'Hern; Jennifer H Barrett
Journal:  J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc       Date:  2004-03

Review 6.  Targeting the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Clara Montagut; Jeff Settleman
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.

Authors:  D Osoba; B Zee; J Pater; D Warr; L Kaizer; J Latreille
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  M J Hjermstad; S D Fossa; K Bjordal; S Kaasa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Reported Physical Function Measures in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Angela M Stover; Daniel F Storfer; Rebecca M Saracino; Thomas A D'Agostino; Denise Pergolizzi; Konstantina Matsoukas; Yuelin Li; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  K-RasV14I recapitulates Noonan syndrome in mice.

Authors:  Isabel Hernández-Porras; Salvatore Fabbiano; Alberto J Schuhmacher; Alexandra Aicher; Marta Cañamero; Juan Antonio Cámara; Lorena Cussó; Manuel Desco; Christopher Heeschen; Francisca Mulero; Xosé R Bustelo; Carmen Guerra; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Sandro Pasquali; Andreas V Hadjinicolaou; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-06

4.  Adjusting for treatment switching in the METRIC study shows further improved overall survival with trametinib compared with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas R Latimer; Helen Bell; Keith R Abrams; Mayur M Amonkar; Michelle Casey
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Radiosensitization and downregulation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K) upon inhibition of mitogen/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) in malignant melanoma cells.

Authors:  Stefan Eder; Andreas Lamkowski; Markus Priller; Matthias Port; Konrad Steinestel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-07-10

6.  Effect of nivolumab on health-related quality of life in patients with treatment-naïve advanced melanoma: results from the phase III CheckMate 066 study.

Authors:  G V Long; V Atkinson; P A Ascierto; C Robert; J C Hassel; P Rutkowski; K J Savage; F Taylor; C Coon; I Gilloteau; H B Dastani; I M Waxman; A P Abernethy
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Multiple treatment comparison of seven new drugs for patients with advanced malignant melanoma: a systematic review and health economic decision model in a Norwegian setting.

Authors:  Eva Pike; Vida Hamidi; Ingvil Saeterdal; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Marianne Klemp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Health-related quality of life impact of cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib in patients with advanced or metastatic BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma.

Authors:  Brigitte Dréno; Paolo A Ascierto; Victoria Atkinson; Gabriella Liszkay; Michele Maio; Mario Mandalà; Lev Demidov; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Luc Thomas; Luis de la Cruz-Merino; Caroline Dutriaux; Claus Garbe; Karen Bartley; Thomas Karagiannis; Ilsung Chang; Isabelle Rooney; Daniel O Koralek; James Larkin; Grant A McArthur; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Trametinib: a MEK inhibitor for management of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Iwona Lugowska; Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk; Katarzyna Kozak; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Elevated Levels of SOX10 in Serum from Vitiligo and Melanoma Patients, Analyzed by Proximity Ligation Assay.

Authors:  Andries Blokzijl; Lei E Chen; Sigrun M Gustafsdottir; Jimmy Vuu; Gustav Ullenhag; Olle Kämpe; Ulf Landegren; Masood Kamali-Moghaddam; Håkan Hedstrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.