Literature DB >> 24504379

Response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 1,051 patients with infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma.

Sibylle Loibl1, Cristina Volz, Christine Mau, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Serban D Costa, Holger Eidtmann, Peter A Fasching, Bernd Gerber, Claus Hanusch, Christian Jackisch, Sherko Kümmel, Jens Huober, Carsten Denkert, Jörn Hilfrich, Gottfried E Konecny, Werner Fett, Elmar Stickeler, Nadia Harbeck, Keyur M Mehta, Valentina Nekljudova, Gunter von Minckwitz, Michael Untch.   

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) show better clinical behaviour compared with other histological types, but significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We investigated whether factors influencing pCR rate in ILC after NACT can be identified and whether clinical outcome is different. 9,020 breast cancer patients from nine German neoadjuvant trials with known histological type were pooled. 11.7 % of tumours were ILC. Endpoints were: pCR rate, surgery type and survival. ILC was associated with older age, larger tumour size, lymph node negativity, lower grade and positive hormone-receptor-status (HR). Patients with ILC achieved a significantly lower pCR rate compared with non-ILC patients (6.2 vs. 17.4 %, P < 0.001). The pCR rate was 4.2 % in ILC/HR+/G1-2, 7.0 % in ILC with either HR- or G3, and 17.8 % in ILC/HR-/G3. Mastectomy rate was higher in ILC compared with non-ILC patients irrespective of response to NACT (pCR: 27.4 vs. 16.6 %, P = 0.037 and non-pCR: 41.8 % vs. 31.5 %, P < 0.0001). Age and HR independently predicted pCR in ILC. In ILC patients, pCR did not predict distant disease free (DDFS) and loco-regional disease free survival (LRFS), but overall survival (OS). Non-pCR patients with ILC had significantly better DDFS (P = 0.018), LRFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P = 0.044) compared with non-ILC patients. Patients with ILC had a low chance of obtaining a pCR and this is not well correlated with further outcome. The mastectomy rate was considerably high in ILC patients even after obtaining a pCR. We, therefore, suggest to offer NACT mainly to ILC patients with HR-negative tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504379     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2861-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  25 in total

1.  Is There a Role for Oncotype Dx Testing in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?

Authors:  Niamh Conlon; Dara S Ross; Jane Howard; Jeffrey P Catalano; Maura N Dickler; Lee K Tan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  The impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nina Tamirisa; Hannah V Williamson; Samantha M Thomas; Kelly E Westbrook; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Terry Hyslop; Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma in different races.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Yang; Li-Peng Yang; Biao Zhu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Efficacy of Single-Agent Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis from Three Clinical Trials.

Authors:  José Pérez-Garcia; Javier Cortés; Otto Metzger Filho
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-12-21

5.  Concerning Dediu M, Zielinski A: A Proposal to Redefine Pathologic Complete Remission as Endpoint following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer. Breast Care 2019; Doi 10.1159/000500620.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy tumour bed boost during breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Kolberg; Gyoergy Loevey; Leyla Akpolat-Basci; Miltiades Stephanou; Peter A Fasching; Michael Untch; Cornelia Liedtke; Max Bulsara; Jayant S Vaidya
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer by Using Three-dimensional Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation and Imaging with US Contrast Agents: Preliminary Experience.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Anush Sridharan; Adam C Berger; Tiffany Avery; Juan P Palazzo; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Mitotic score and pleomorphic histology in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: impact on disease-free survival.

Authors:  Rita A Mukhtar; Gregor Krings; Yunn-Yi Chen; Matina E Mamounas; Kelly Fahrner-Scott; Jasmine Wong; Michael Alvarado; Cheryl Ewing; Laura J Esserman; Hope Rugo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy Tumour Bed Boost during Breast-Conserving Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy - a Subgroup Analysis of Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Kolberg; György Lövey; Leyla Akpolat-Basci; Miltiades Stephanou; Peter Fasching; Michael Untch; Oliver Hoffmann; Max Bulsara; Jayant Vaidya; Cornelia Liedtke
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.