Literature DB >> 24504186

Causes and consequences of genetic background effects illuminated by integrative genomic analysis.

Christopher H Chandler1, Sudarshan Chari, David Tack, Ian Dworkin.   

Abstract

The phenotypic consequences of individual mutations are modulated by the wild-type genetic background in which they occur. Although such background dependence is widely observed, we do not know whether general patterns across species and traits exist or about the mechanisms underlying it. We also lack knowledge on how mutations interact with genetic background to influence gene expression and how this in turn mediates mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, how genetic background influences patterns of epistasis remains unclear. To investigate the genetic basis and genomic consequences of genetic background dependence of the scalloped(E3) allele on the Drosophila melanogaster wing, we generated multiple novel genome-level datasets from a mapping-by-introgression experiment and a tagged RNA gene expression dataset. In addition we used whole genome resequencing of the parental lines-two commonly used laboratory strains-to predict polymorphic transcription factor binding sites for SD. We integrated these data with previously published genomic datasets from expression microarrays and a modifier mutation screen. By searching for genes showing a congruent signal across multiple datasets, we were able to identify a robust set of candidate loci contributing to the background-dependent effects of mutations in sd. We also show that the majority of background-dependent modifiers previously reported are caused by higher-order epistasis, not quantitative noncomplementation. These findings provide a useful foundation for more detailed investigations of genetic background dependence in this system, and this approach is likely to prove useful in exploring the genetic basis of other traits as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epistasis; genetic background effects; introgression mapping; modifier genes; mutant expressivity; transcriptional profiling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504186      PMCID: PMC3982700          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.159426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  75 in total

1.  Specific interactions between vestigial and scalloped are required to promote wing tissue proliferation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Paumard-Rigal; A Zider; P Vaudin; J Silber
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Quantitative developmental genetic analysis reveals that the ancestral dipteran wing vein prepattern is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Palsson; G Gibson
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-beta signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Regulatory sequences of the Sgs-4 gene of Drosophila melanogaster analysed by P element-mediated transformation.

Authors:  A Hofmann; A Keinhorst; A Krumm; G Korge
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The Hippo kinase promotes Scalloped cytoplasmic localization independently of Warts in a CRM1/Exportin1-dependent manner in Drosophila.

Authors:  Julie Cagliero; Antoine Forget; Enrico Daldello; Joël Silber; Alain Zider
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype.

Authors:  D W Threadgill; A A Dlugosz; L A Hansen; T Tennenbaum; U Lichti; D Yee; C LaMantia; T Mourton; K Herrup; R C Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The scalloped gene encodes a novel, evolutionarily conserved transcription factor required for sensory organ differentiation in Drosophila.

Authors:  S Campbell; M Inamdar; V Rodrigues; V Raghavan; M Palazzolo; A Chovnick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Next-generation tag sequencing for cancer gene expression profiling.

Authors:  A Sorana Morrissy; Ryan D Morin; Allen Delaney; Thomas Zeng; Helen McDonald; Steven Jones; Yongjun Zhao; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Role of pleiotropy in the evolution of a cryptic developmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Fabien Duveau; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dexter Duncan; Zhiao Shi; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  30 in total

1.  Increased diagnostic and new genes identification outcome using research reanalysis of singleton exome sequencing.

Authors:  Ange-Line Bruel; Sophie Nambot; Virginie Quéré; Antonio Vitobello; Julien Thevenon; Mirna Assoum; Sébastien Moutton; Nada Houcinat; Daphné Lehalle; Nolwenn Jean-Marçais; Martin Chevarin; Thibaud Jouan; Charlotte Poë; Patrick Callier; Emilie Tisserand; Christophe Philippe; Frédéric Tran Mau Them; Yannis Duffourd; Laurence Faivre; Christel Thauvin-Robinet
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Rearing and Double-stranded RNA-mediated Gene Knockdown in the Hide Beetle, Dermestes maculatus.

Authors:  Jie Xiang; Katie Reding; Leslie Pick
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel.

Authors:  P N Gonzalez; M Pavlicev; P Mitteroecker; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; R A Spritz; R S Marcucio; B Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  Genetic suppression: Extending our knowledge from lab experiments to natural populations.

Authors:  Takeshi Matsui; Jonathan T Lee; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 5.  Considerations when choosing a genetic model organism for metabolomics studies.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Charles F Baer; Arthur S Edison
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Genetic basis of a spontaneous mutation's expressivity.

Authors:  Rachel Schell; Joseph J Hale; Martin N Mullis; Takeshi Matsui; Ryan Foree; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits.

Authors:  Matthew B Taylor; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Comparative mapping of the 22q11.2 deletion region and the potential of simple model organisms.

Authors:  Alina Guna; Nancy J Butcher; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Natural variants suppress mutations in hundreds of essential genes.

Authors:  Leopold Parts; Amandine Batté; Maykel Lopes; Michael W Yuen; Meredith Laver; Bryan-Joseph San Luis; Jia-Xing Yue; Carles Pons; Elise Eray; Patrick Aloy; Gianni Liti; Jolanda van Leeuwen
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 13.068

10.  The iBeetle large-scale RNAi screen reveals gene functions for insect development and physiology.

Authors:  Christian Schmitt-Engel; Dorothea Schultheis; Jonas Schwirz; Nadi Ströhlein; Nicole Troelenberg; Upalparna Majumdar; Van Anh Dao; Daniela Grossmann; Tobias Richter; Maike Tech; Jürgen Dönitz; Lizzy Gerischer; Mirko Theis; Inga Schild; Jochen Trauner; Nikolaus D B Koniszewski; Elke Küster; Sebastian Kittelmann; Yonggang Hu; Sabrina Lehmann; Janna Siemanowski; Julia Ulrich; Kristen A Panfilio; Reinhard Schröder; Burkhard Morgenstern; Mario Stanke; Frank Buchhholz; Manfred Frasch; Siegfried Roth; Ernst A Wimmer; Michael Schoppmeier; Martin Klingler; Gregor Bucher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.