Literature DB >> 24502839

Are performance-based functional assessments superior to semistructured interviews for enhancing return-to-work outcomes?

Douglas P Gross1, Alexander K Asante2, Maxi Miciak3, Michele C Battié4, Linda J Carroll5, Ambrose Sun6, Marti Mikalsky6, Rene Huellstrung6, Riikka Niemeläinen6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether use of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) leads to better outcomes for injured workers.
DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial conducted with analysis at level of claimant.
SETTING: Rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included claimants (N=203); of these, 103 were tested with FCE. Data were collected on all claimants undergoing RTW assessment at the facility for musculoskeletal conditions. Participants were predominantly employed (59%) men (73%) with chronic musculoskeletal conditions (median duration, 496d).
INTERVENTIONS: FCEs are commonly used to identify work abilities and inform return-to-work (RTW) decisions. Therefore, FCE results have important consequences. Clinicians who were trained and experienced in performing FCEs were randomized into 2 groups. One group included 14 clinicians who were trained to conduct a semistructured functional interview; the other group (control group) continued to use standard FCE procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included RTW recommendations after assessment, functional work level at time of assessment and 1, 3, and 6 months after assessment, and compensation outcomes. Analysis included Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and t tests.
RESULTS: All outcomes were similar between groups, and no statistically or clinically significant differences were observed. Mean differences between groups on functional work levels at assessment and follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 out of 4 (3%-8% difference, P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Performance-based FCEs did not appear to enhance RTW outcomes beyond information gained from semistructured functional interviewing. Use of functional interviewing has the potential to improve efficiency of RTW assessment without compromising clinical, RTW, or compensation outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insurance, disability; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Return to work; Workers' compensation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24502839     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  5 in total

1.  Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting.

Authors:  C L James; M F Reneman; D P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-03

2.  Motivational Interviewing for Workers with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Cluster Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Joanne Park; Shaniff Esmail; Fahreen Rayani; Colleen M Norris; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-06

3.  Functional Interviewing Was Associated With Improved Agreement Among Expert Psychiatrists in Estimating Claimant Work Capacity: A Secondary Data Analysis of Real-Life Work Disability Evaluations.

Authors:  David Y von Allmen; Sarah Kedzia; Raphael Dettwiler; Nicole Vogel; Regina Kunz; Wout E L de Boer
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  A pilot study to assess a risk of a high-risk group of low back pain membership in workers who perform the manual material handling tasks.

Authors:  Sungho Lee; Seongchan Heo; Jong-Young Lee
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  A Descriptive Study of the Implementation of Remote Occupational Rehabilitation Services Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Within a Workers' Compensation Context.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Alexander Asante; Joanne Pawluk; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.