Literature DB >> 24501627

Non contiguous-finished genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar syringae strain B64 isolated from wheat.

Alexey Dudnik1, Robert Dudler1.   

Abstract

The Gram-negative gammaproteobacterium Pseudomonas syringae is one of the most wide-spread plant pathogens and has been repeatedly reported to cause significant damage to crop plantations. Research on this pathogen is very intensive, but most of it is done on isolates that are pathogenic to Arabidopsis, tomato, and bean. Here, we announce a high-quality draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B64 which is the first published genome of a P. syringae strain isolated from wheat up to date. The genome sequence will assist in gaining insights into basic virulence mechanisms of this pathogen which has a relatively small complement of type III effectors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas syringae; genome; plant-pathogen interactions; syringolin; wheat

Year:  2013        PMID: 24501627      PMCID: PMC3910705          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3997732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

strains have been isolated from more than 180 host species [1] across the entire plant kingdom, including many agriculturally important crops, such as bean, tomato, cucumber, as well as kiwi, stone fruit, and olive trees. Strains are divided into more than 50 pathovars primarily based on host-specificity, disease symptoms, and biochemical profiles [2-4]. The first strain of this species was isolated from a lilac tree (Syringa vulgaris), which gave origin to its name [5].The observed wide host range is reflected in a relatively large genetic heterogeneity among different pathovars. This is most pronounced in the complement of virulence factors, which is also assumed to be the key factor defining host specificity [6]. For successful survival and reproduction, both epiphytic and endophytic strains deploy different sets of type III and type VI secretion system effectors, phytotoxins, EPS, and other types of secreted molecules [6-11]. Currently, there are three completely sequenced genomes published: pathovar syringae strain B728a which causes brown spot disease of bean [12], pathovar tomato strain DC3000 which is pathogenic to tomato and Arabidopsis [13], and pathovar phaseolicola strain 1448A, causal agent of halo blight on bean [14]. There are also a number of incomplete genomes of various qualities available for other strains. pv. syringae strain B64 was isolated from hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Minnesota, USA [15]. The strain has been deployed in several studies mainly addressing phylogenetic diversity of varieties [15-18], but never as an infection model for wheat. The genome sequencing of the B64 strain and its comparison with the other published genomes should reveal wheat-specific adaptations and give insights in virulence strategies for colonizing monocot plants.

Classification and features

belongs to class . Detailed classification of this species is still under heavy debate. Young and colleagues have proposed to group all plant-pathogenic oxidase-negative and fluorescent strains into a single species, , which is to be further sub-divided into pathovars [4,19]. Several DNA hybridization studies have shown a large genetic heterogeneity among the groups, however biochemical characteristics, with a few exceptions, did not allow elevating those into distinct species [20,21]. Currently, the species is divided into five phylogenetic clades based on MLST analysis. pv. syringae (Pss) strains belong to group II within this nomenclature [22]. The basic characteristics of Pss B64 are summarized in Table 1, while its phylogenetic position is depicted in Figure 1.
Table 1

Classification and the general features of pv. syringae B64 according to the MIGS recommendations [23]

MIGS ID    Property   Term   Evidence codea
   Domain Bacteria   TAS [24]
   Phylum Proteobacteria   TAS [25]
   Class Gammaproteobacteria   TAS [26,27]
    Current classification   Order Pseudomonadales   TAS [28,29]
   Family Pseudomonadaceae   TAS [30,31]
   Genus Pseudomonas   TAS [30-34]
   Species Pseudomonas syringae   TAS [30,35]
   Pathovar syringae   TAS [36]
   Strain B64   TAS [15,16]
    Gram stain   Negative   TAS [37]
    Cell shape   Rod-shaped   TAS [37]
    Motility   Motile   TAS [37]
    Sporulation   None   TAS [37]
    Temperature range   Mesophilic   TAS [38]
    Optimum temperature   28°C   TAS [38]
MIGS-22    Oxygen   Aerobic   TAS [37]
    Carbon source   Heterotrophic   TAS [36]
    Energy metabolism   Chemoorganotrophic   TAS [37]
MIGS-6    Habitat   Host-associated   TAS [17,36,37]
MIGS-6.3    Salinity   Not reported
MIGS-10    Extrachromosomal elements   None   IDA
MIGS-11    Estimated Size   5.93 Mb   IDA
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship   Parasitic   NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity   Pathogenic   TAS [19]
    Host   Triticum aestivum   TAS [15,17]
    Host taxa ID   4565
    Cell arrangement   Single   TAS
    Biosafety level   1   NAS
    Isolation source   Leaf   NAS
MIGS-4    Geographic location   Minnesota, USA   TAS [15]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time   Not reported
MIGS-4.1    Latitude   Not reported
MIGS-4.2    Longitude   Not reported
MIGS-4.3    Depth   Not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude   Not reported

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property of the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39].

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree constructed using neighbor-joining method using MLST approach [40] and MEGA 5.10 software suit [41] with 1,000 bootstraps. The tree features the three completely sequenced model strains Pto DC3000, Pss B728a, and Pph 1448A, the strain Pss B64 itself, as well as another wheat-isolated strain Pss SM. The model strains represent the major phylogenetic clades of : I, II and III respectively. Pf0-1 was used as an outgroup. The analysis confirms placement of Pss B64 into clade II.

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property of the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39]. Phylogenetic tree constructed using neighbor-joining method using MLST approach [40] and MEGA 5.10 software suit [41] with 1,000 bootstraps. The tree features the three completely sequenced model strains Pto DC3000, Pss B728a, and Pph 1448A, the strain Pss B64 itself, as well as another wheat-isolated strain Pss SM. The model strains represent the major phylogenetic clades of : I, II and III respectively. Pf0-1 was used as an outgroup. The analysis confirms placement of Pss B64 into clade II. Pss B64 has similar physiological properties as other representatives of its genus. It can grow in complex media such as LB [42] or King’s B [43], as well as in various defined minimal media: HSC [44], MG-agar [45], PMS [46], AB-agar [47], and SRMAF [48]. Even though the optimal growth temperature is 28°C, the bacterium can also replicate at 4°C. Growth is completely inhibited above 35°C. Pss B64 is capable of endophytic growth in the wheat leaf mesophyll, but does not seem to cause any symptoms unless a very high inoculation dose is applied. The bacterium has a weak resistance to ampicillin (25 mg/L) and chloramphenicol (10 mg/L). It is also possible to develop spontaneous rifampicin-resistant mutants. In addition, the genomic sequence predicts this strain to be polymyxin B insensitive due to presence of the arn gene cluster.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing because it has been identified to have a syringolin biosynthesis gene cluster [49]. Syringolin is a proteasome inhibitor produced by some strains of pathovar syringae. As a consequence of proteasome inactivation a number of plant intracellular pathways are being inhibited, including the entire salicylic acid-dependent defense pathway, thus promoting the entry of bacteria into leaf tissue and subsequent endophytic growth [9]. Since up to now it has not been possible to establish an infection model for syringolin in the model plant Arabidopsis, it was decided to explore another common research target and one of the most important crop plants, bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). The genome project has been deposited in the Genbank Database (ID 180994) and the genome sequence is available under accession number ANZF00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ANZF01000000. The details of the project are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property    Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality    High-quality draft
MIGS-28   Libraries used    3kb paired-end library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platform    Roche Genome Sequencer FLX+
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage    31.8×
MIGS-30   Assembler    Newbler 2.5.3
MIGS-31.3   Contigs    41
MIGS-32   Gene calling method    RAST server
   NCBI project ID    180994
   NCBI accession number    ANZF00000000
   Date of release    January 18, 2013
   GOLD ID    Gc02493
   Database: IMG/ER    2523533564
   Project relevance    Plant-pathogen interactions, model for syringolin effects

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

pv. syringae strain B64 was grown in 40 mL of LB medium at 28°C, 220 rpm until OD600 of ~1.0. Genomic DNA was isolated from the pelleted cell using a Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genome sequencing and assembly

A 3kb paired-end library was generated and sequenced at the Functional Genomics Center Zurich on a Roche Genome Sequencer FLX+ platform. A total of 872,570 high-quality filtered reads with a total of 188,465,376 bases were obtained, resulting in 31.8-fold average sequencing coverage. The obtained reads were assembled de novo using Newbler 2.5.3. This resulted in 150 contigs combined into one 6 Mb-long super-scaffold and 3 smaller scaffolds of 5.29 kb, 2.84 kb and 2.74 kb in size. The largest of the minor scaffolds constituted a ribosomal RNA operon, the other two showed sequence similarity to non-ribosomal peptide synthase modules. A portion of intra-scaffold gaps have been closed by sequencing of PCR products using Sanger technology, decreasing the total number of contigs to 41 with a contig N50 value of 329.4 kb, the longest contig being 766.5 kb long. Note that the Genbank record contains 42 contigs due to fact that one of the contigs was split into two parts in order to start the assembly with the dnaA gene. While closing gaps it became possible to allocate the positions of all ribosomal operons by sequence overlap and thus to incorporate the largest of the minor scaffolds. However, it was not possible to precisely map the remaining two minor scaffolds. These must be located within two distinct remaining large gaps, but due to insignificance to the project they have been excluded from the assembly.

Genome annotation

Initial open-reading frame (ORF), tRNA, and rRNA prediction and functional annotation has been performed using the RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology) server [50]. For the purpose of comparison, the genome has also been annotated using Prokka [51], which utilizes Prodigal [52] for ORF prediction (the RAST server utilizes a modified version of Glimmer [53]). Start codons of all the predicted ORFs were further verified manually, using the position of potential ribosomal binding sites and BLASTP [54] alignments with homologous ORFs from other strains as a reference. Functional annotations have also been refined for every ORF using BLASTP searches against the non-redundant protein sequence database (nr) and the NCBI Conserved-Domain search engine [55]. Functional category assignment and signal peptide prediction was done using the Integrated Microbial Genomes/Expert reviews (IMG/ER) system [56].

Genome properties

The genome of the strain B64 is estimated to be comprised of 5,930,035 base pairs with an average GC-content of 58.55 % (Table 3 and Figure 2), which is similar to what is observed in other strains [12,13,53]. Of the 5,021 predicted genes, 4,947 were protein coding genes, 4 ribosomal RNA operons, and 61 tRNA genes; 78 were identified to be pseudo-genes. The majority of the protein-coding genes (83.65 %) were assigned a putative function, while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Estimated genome size (bp)   5,930,035   100.00
Estimated total gap length (bp)   56,737   0.96
DNA coding region (bp)   5,146,184   86.78
DNA G+C content (bp)   3,472,195   58.55
Number of replicons   1   -
Extra-chromosomal elements   0   -
Total genes   5,021   100.00
Protein-coding genesa   4,869   96.97
RNA genes   74   1.47
rRNA genes   13   0.26
5S rRNA   5   0.10
16S rRNA   4   0.08
23S rRNA   4   0.08
tRNA genes   61   1.21
rRNA operons   4   -
Pseudo-genes   78   1.55
Protein coding genes with function prediction   4,200   83.65
without function predictiona   669   13.32
Protein coding genes with COGs   4,013   79.92
with KOGs   1,698   33.82
with Pfam   4,256   84.76
with TIGRfam   1,641   32.68
in paralog clusters   3,933   78.33
Proteins with signal peptides   511   10.18
Proteins with transmembrane helices   1,112   22.15

aexcluding pseudo-genes; therefore percentage values differ from those displayed at the IMG/ER

Figure 2

Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes: tRNAs - green, rRNAs - red, other RNAs - black, GC content, and GC skew

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code   Value   %age   Description
J   208   4.60   Translation
A   1   0.02   RNA processing and modification
K   352   7.78   Transcription
L   162   3.58   Replication, recombination and repair
B   1   0.02   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   42   0.93   Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y   -   -   Nuclear structure
V   48   1.06   Defense mechanisms
T   332   7.34   Signal transduction mechanisms
M   275   6.08   Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   159   3.52   Cell motility
Z   1   0.02   Cytoskeleton
W   -   -   Extracellular structures
U   140   3.10   Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O   156   3.45   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   230   5.09   Energy production and conversion
G   265   5.86   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   439   9.71   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   90   1.99   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   177   3.91   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   152   3.36   Lipid transport and metabolism
P   268   5.93   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   122   2.70   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   515   11.39   General function prediction only
S   388   8.58   Function unknown
-   1,008   20.08   Not in COGs
aexcluding pseudo-genes; therefore percentage values differ from those displayed at the IMG/ER Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes: tRNAs - green, rRNAs - red, other RNAs - black, GC content, and GC skew The genome contains a complete canonical type III secretion system and ten known effector proteins: AvrE1, HopAA1, HopI1, HopM1, HopAH1, HopAG1, HopAI1, HopAZ1, HopBA1, and HopZ3. Out of these ten, the first five are present in all other sequenced strains, thereby constituting the effector core, whereas the latter five could be host-determinants for wheat. That there is such a small number of effectors is not something unusual, and is seen in other strains of clade II [22]. In addition, there are two complete type VI secretion system gene clusters and nine putative effector proteins belonging to the VgrG and Hcp1 families. Pss B64 genome also encodes gene clusters for biosynthesis of four phytotoxin: syringomycin, syringopeptin, syringolin, and mangotoxin. All of the above-mentioned genome components have been previously demonstrated to be involved in virulence, epiphytic fitness of , as well as in competition with other microbial species [7-10,57-59]. Additional identified virulence-associated traits are: exopolysaccharides alginate, Psl, and levan biosynthesis, surfactant syringofactin, type VI pili, large surface adhesins, siderophores pyoverdine and achromobactin, proteases and other secreted hydrolytic enzymes, RND-type transporters (including putative mexAB, mexCD, mexEF, and mexMN homologs [60,61]), all of which are found in other strains. It is also notable that inaZ gene encoding ice-nucleation protein is truncated by a frameshift, thus making this strain ice-negative. The latter contradicts results of a previous study by Hwang and colleagues [16] in which Pss B64 has been identified to be ice-positive. This could be due to an assembly error, or the frameshift could have been introduced at a later point during propagation.
  42 in total

1.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  The Families and Genera of the Bacteria: Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types.

Authors:  C E Winslow; J Broadhurst; R E Buchanan; C Krumwiede; L A Rogers; G H Smith
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1917-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  The Main Lines of the Natural Bacterial System.

Authors:  S Orla-Jensen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1921-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Involvement of bacterial polysaccharides in plant pathogenesis.

Authors:  T P Denny
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 13.078

5.  Gene cloning and properties of the RND-type multidrug efflux pumps MexPQ-OpmE and MexMN-OprM from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Takehiko Mima; Hiroshi Sekiya; Tohru Mizushima; Teruo Kuroda; Tomofusa Tsuchiya
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.955

6.  Genetic diversity and relationships of two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  T P Denny; M N Gilmour; R K Selander
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1988-07

7.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Hcp2, a secreted protein of the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, is required for fitness for competition against bacteria and yeasts.

Authors:  Minna Haapalainen; Hanna Mosorin; Federico Dorati; Ru-Fen Wu; Elina Roine; Suvi Taira; Riitta Nissinen; Laura Mattinen; Robert Jackson; Minna Pirhonen; Nai-Chun Lin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Genome sequence analyses of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. glycinea and subtractive hybridization-based comparative genomics with nine pseudomonads.

Authors:  Mingsheng Qi; Dongping Wang; Carl A Bradley; Youfu Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic evolution of pathogenicity revealed by sequencing and comparative genomics of 19 Pseudomonas syringae isolates.

Authors:  David A Baltrus; Marc T Nishimura; Artur Romanchuk; Jeff H Chang; M Shahid Mukhtar; Karen Cherkis; Jeff Roach; Sarah R Grant; Corbin D Jones; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterization of Novel Family IV Esterase and Family I.3 Lipase from an Oil-Polluted Mud Flat Metagenome.

Authors:  Hee Jung Kim; Yu Seok Jeong; Won Kyeong Jung; Sung Kyum Kim; Hyun Woo Lee; Hyung-Yeel Kahng; Jungho Kim; Hoon Kim
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Comprehensive analysis of draft genomes of two closely related pseudomonas syringae phylogroup 2b strains infecting mono- and dicotyledon host plants.

Authors:  Rinat I Sultanov; Georgij P Arapidi; Svetlana V Vinogradova; Vadim M Govorun; Duglas G Luster; Alexander N Ignatov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Comparative Genomics of Prunus-Associated Members of the Pseudomonas syringae Species Complex Reveals Traits Supporting Co-evolution and Host Adaptation.

Authors:  Michela Ruinelli; Jochen Blom; Theo H M Smits; Joël F Pothier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Comparative genomics of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strains B301D and HS191 and insights into intrapathovar traits associated with plant pathogenesis.

Authors:  Aravind Ravindran; Neha Jalan; Joshua S Yuan; Nian Wang; Dennis C Gross
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Virulence determinants of Pseudomonas syringae strains isolated from grasses in the context of a small type III effector repertoire.

Authors:  Alexey Dudnik; Robert Dudler
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Genomics-Based Exploration of Virulence Determinants and Host-Specific Adaptations of Pseudomonas syringae Strains Isolated from Grasses.

Authors:  Alexey Dudnik; Robert Dudler
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2014-01-28

7.  Identification of the Genes of the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae MB03 Required for the Nematicidal Activity Against Caenorhabditis elegans Through an Integrated Approach.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali; Tong Gu; Xun Yu; Anum Bashir; Zhiyong Wang; Xiaowen Sun; Naeem Mahmood Ashraf; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.