Literature DB >> 24501152

Perceptions of communication, family adaptability and cohesion: a comparison of adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer and their parents.

Celeste R Phillips-Salimi, Sheri L Robb, Patrick O Monahan, Amy Dossey, Joan E Haase.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and compare adolescent and parent perspectives on communication, family adaptability and cohesion, as well as relationships among these variables, during the first month of an adolescent's cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Seventy adolescent-parent dyads were enrolled as part of a larger multi-site study. The adolescents ranged in age from 11 to 19, and 61% were males. Parents were predominately mothers (83%). Dyads were predominately non-Hispanic Caucasian (63%). Measures included the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES II). Paired t-tests, Pearson correlations, intra-class correlation coefficients and multiple linear regression analyses were completed.
RESULTS: Adolescent scores on communication, family adaptability and cohesion were significantly lower than parent scores. The inter-dyadic agreement between adolescents and parents was low. Communication, family adaptability and cohesion were examined separately for adolescents and for parents, and significant relationships were found. Both adolescent- and parent-perceived communication was significantly associated with family adaptability and cohesion outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences were found in adolescent and parent perceptions of communication, family adaptability and cohesion. When both adolescents and parents had better perceived communication, this was associated with better perceived family adaptability and cohesion. Results suggest that the development of interventions to enhance adolescent-parent communication could help foster better family adaptability and cohesion, which may ultimately impact their psychological adjustment. In addition, understanding the degree to which adolescents and parents disagree on their perceptions, including the results that parents generally have more favorable perceptions, may be a useful starting point when developing interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24501152      PMCID: PMC5497841          DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2012-0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adolesc Med Health        ISSN: 0334-0139


  19 in total

1.  Research triangulation to derive meaning-based quality-of-life theory: adolescent resilience model and instrument development.

Authors:  J E Haase; S P Heiney; K S Ruccione; C Stutzer
Journal:  Int J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1999

Review 2.  The adolescent resilience model as a guide to interventions.

Authors:  Joan E Haase
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Parent-adolescent communication, family functioning, and school performance.

Authors:  V S Masselam; R F Marcus; C L Stunkard
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  1990

4.  Posttraumatic stress, family functioning, and social support in survivors of childhood leukemia and their mothers and fathers.

Authors:  A E Kazak; L P Barakat; K Meeske; D Christakis; A T Meadows; R Casey; B Penati; M L Stuber
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-02

5.  Adolescent and parent perceptions of family cohesion and adaptability.

Authors:  P Noller; V J Callan
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  1986-03

6.  An evaluation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and the Circumplex Model.

Authors:  J D Rodick; S W Henggeler; C L Hanson
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1986-03

Review 7.  Psychosocial dimensions of cancer in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Elana E Evan; Lonnie K Zeltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Impact of early onset bipolar disorder on family functioning: adolescents' perceptions of family dynamics, communication, and problems.

Authors:  H A Robertson; S P Kutcher; D Bird; L Grasswick
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Information about diagnosis and prognosis related to anxiety and depression in children with cancer aged 8-16 years.

Authors:  B F Last; A M van Veldhuizen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers and fathers of survivors of childhood cancers.

Authors:  A E Kazak; M L Stuber; L P Barakat; K Meeske; D Guthrie; A T Meadows
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 8.829

View more
  3 in total

1.  Information-sharing challenges between adolescents with cancer, their parents and health care providers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Masoud Bahrami; Mahboobeh Namnabati; Fariborz Mokarian; Parastoo Oujian; Paul Arbon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Darren Mays; Tiffani DeMarco; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Perceived family adaptability and cohesion and depressive symptoms: A comparison of adolescents and parents during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mengxue Li; Lili Li; Feng Wu; Yang Cao; Huanrui Zhang; Xin Li; Jie Zou; Zhongwu Guo; Lingtao Kong
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.839

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.