BACKGROUND: Despite their high rates of depression, homebound older adults have limited access to evidence-based psychotherapy. The purpose of this paper was to report both depression and disability outcomes of telehealth problem-solving therapy (tele-PST via Skype video call) for low-income homebound older adults over 6 months postintervention. METHODS: A 3-arm randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of tele-PST to in-person PST and telephone care calls with 158 homebound individuals who were aged 50+ and scored 15+ on the24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). Treatment effects on depression severity (HAMD score) and disability (score on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule [WHODAS]) were analyzed using mixed-effects regression with random intercept models. Possible reciprocal relationships between depression and disability were examined with a parallel-process latent growth curve model. RESULTS: Both tele-PST and in-person PST were efficacious treatments for low-income homebound older adults; however the effects of tele-PST on both depression and disability outcomes were sustained significantly longer than those of in-person PST. Effect sizes (dGMA-raw ) for HAMD score changes at 36 weeks were 0.68 for tele-PST and 0.20 for in-person PST. Effect sizes for WHODAS score changes at 36 weeks were 0.47 for tele-PST and 0.25 for in-person PST. The results also supported reciprocal and indirect effects between depression and disability outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and potential low cost of tele-delivered psychotherapy show its potential for easy replication and sustainability to reach a large number of underserved older adults and improve their access to mental health services.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite their high rates of depression, homebound older adults have limited access to evidence-based psychotherapy. The purpose of this paper was to report both depression and disability outcomes of telehealth problem-solving therapy (tele-PST via Skype video call) for low-income homebound older adults over 6 months postintervention. METHODS: A 3-arm randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of tele-PST to in-personPST and telephone care calls with 158 homebound individuals who were aged 50+ and scored 15+ on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). Treatment effects on depression severity (HAMD score) and disability (score on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule [WHODAS]) were analyzed using mixed-effects regression with random intercept models. Possible reciprocal relationships between depression and disability were examined with a parallel-process latent growth curve model. RESULTS: Both tele-PST and in-personPST were efficacious treatments for low-income homebound older adults; however the effects of tele-PST on both depression and disability outcomes were sustained significantly longer than those of in-personPST. Effect sizes (dGMA-raw ) for HAMD score changes at 36 weeks were 0.68 for tele-PST and 0.20 for in-personPST. Effect sizes for WHODAS score changes at 36 weeks were 0.47 for tele-PST and 0.25 for in-personPST. The results also supported reciprocal and indirect effects between depression and disability outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and potential low cost of tele-delivered psychotherapy show its potential for easy replication and sustainability to reach a large number of underserved older adults and improve their access to mental health services.
Authors: Patrick J Raue; Barnett S Meyers; Jennifer L Rowe; Moonseong Heo; Martha L Bruce Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Michael Schoenbaum; Wayne J Katon; Ming-Yu Fan; Harold A Pincus; Diane Hogan; Jennifer Taylor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Donald M Hilty; Daphne C Ferrer; Michelle Burke Parish; Barb Johnston; Edward J Callahan; Peter M Yellowlees Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Zvi D Gellis; Jean McGinty; Amy Horowitz; Martha L Bruce; Elizabeth Misener Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Sagar V Parikh; Lena C Quilty; Paula Ravitz; Michael Rosenbluth; Barbara Pavlova; Sophie Grigoriadis; Vytas Velyvis; Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun V Ravindran; Rudolf Uher Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Alan R Teo; HwaJung Choi; Sarah B Andrea; Marcia Valenstein; Jason T Newsom; Steven K Dobscha; Kara Zivin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kathleen R Bell; Jesse R Fann; Jo Ann Brockway; Wesley R Cole; Nigel E Bush; Sureyya Dikmen; Tessa Hart; Ariel J Lang; Gerald Grant; Gregory Gahm; Mark A Reger; Jef St De Lore; Joan Machamer; Karin Ernstrom; Rema Raman; Sonia Jain; Murray B Stein; Nancy Temkin Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 5.269