Literature DB >> 24500536

Adverse responses and physical activity: secondary analysis of the PREPARE trial.

Thomas Yates1, Melanie J Davies, Charlotte Edwardson, Danielle H Bodicoat, Stuart J H Biddle, Kamlesh Khunti.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Physical activity has been hypothesized to cause adverse metabolic responses in a minority of participants. We use secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial to investigate rates of adverse metabolic responses in a population at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: We investigated data from the PREPARE trial; individuals with impaired glucose tolerance were randomized to the following: control (advice leaflet); intervention 1, a 3-h group-based structured education program aimed at promoting physical activity; or intervention 2, a 3-h structured education program with personalized pedometer use. Intervention 2, but not intervention 1, resulted in increased physical activity at 3, 6, and 12 months. An adverse response was defined as a change of ≥0.8 mmol·L for fasting glucose, ≥1.3 mmol·L for 2-h glucose, ≥0.42 mmol·L for triglycerides, and -0.12 mmol·L or less for HDL-cholesterol. Each group included 29 participants. Data were collected between 2006 and 2008 and analyzed in 2013.
RESULTS: In total, 12 (41%) participants in intervention 2 had an adverse response; rates in intervention 1 and the control group were 23 (79%) and 22 (76%), respectively. The odds of an adverse response were reduced in intervention 2 compared with control (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.69). For the combined cohort, those who had increased physical activity at each time point had reduced odds of an adverse response compared with those who did not (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.93).
CONCLUSION: Although some individuals experienced an adverse metabolic response after a successful physical activity intervention, rates were higher under control conditions. This study does not support the hypothesis that increased physical activity per se increases the risk of an adverse metabolic response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500536     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  5 in total

Review 1.  Exercise resistance across the prediabetes phenotypes: Impact on insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism.

Authors:  Steven K Malin; Zhenqi Liu; Eugene J Barrett; Arthur Weltman
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Metabolic effects of resistance or high-intensity interval training among glycemic control-nonresponsive children with insulin resistance.

Authors:  C Álvarez; R Ramírez-Campillo; R Ramírez-Vélez; C Martínez; M Castro-Sepúlveda; A Alonso-Martínez; M Izquierdo
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  The prevalence of adverse cardiometabolic responses to exercise training with evidence-based practice is low.

Authors:  Lance C Dalleck; Gary P Van Guilder; Tara B Richardson; Chantal A Vella
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 4.  Exercise and diabetes: relevance and causes for response variability.

Authors:  Anja Böhm; Cora Weigert; Harald Staiger; Hans-Ulrich Häring
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Prevalence of Non-responders for Glucose Control Markers after 10 Weeks of High-Intensity Interval Training in Adult Women with Higher and Lower Insulin Resistance.

Authors:  Cristian Álvarez; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.