Catherine L Jo1, John W Ayers2, Benjamin M Althouse3, Sherry Emery4, Jidong Huang4, Kurt M Ribisl5. 1. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA. 3. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. 4. Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This quasi-experimental longitudinal study monitored aggregate Google search queries as a proxy for consumer interest in non-cigarette tobacco products (NTP) around the time of the 2009 US federal tobacco tax increase. METHODS: Query trends for searches mentioning common NTP were downloaded from Google's public archives. The mean relative increase was estimated by comparing the observed with expected query volume for the 16 weeks around the tax. RESULTS: After the tax was announced, queries spiked for chewing tobacco, cigarillos, electronic cigarettes ('e-cigarettes'), roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, snuff, and snus. E-cigarette queries were 75% (95% CI 70% to 80%) higher than expected 8 weeks before and after the tax, followed by RYO 59% (95% CI 53% to 65%), snus 34% (95% CI 31% to 37%), chewing tobacco 17% (95% CI 15% to 20%), cigarillos 14% (95% CI 11% to 17%), and snuff 13% (95% CI 10% to 14%). Unique queries increasing the most were 'ryo cigarettes' 427% (95% CI 308% to 534%), 'ryo tobacco' 348% (95% CI 300% to 391%), 'best electronic cigarette' 221% (95% CI 185% to 257%), and 'e-cigarette' 205% (95% CI 163% to 245%). CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 tobacco tax increase triggered large increases in consumer interest for some NTP, particularly e-cigarettes and RYO tobacco. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: This quasi-experimental longitudinal study monitored aggregate Google search queries as a proxy for consumer interest in non-cigarette tobacco products (NTP) around the time of the 2009 US federal tobacco tax increase. METHODS: Query trends for searches mentioning common NTP were downloaded from Google's public archives. The mean relative increase was estimated by comparing the observed with expected query volume for the 16 weeks around the tax. RESULTS: After the tax was announced, queries spiked for chewing tobacco, cigarillos, electronic cigarettes ('e-cigarettes'), roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, snuff, and snus. E-cigarette queries were 75% (95% CI 70% to 80%) higher than expected 8 weeks before and after the tax, followed by RYO 59% (95% CI 53% to 65%), snus 34% (95% CI 31% to 37%), chewing tobacco 17% (95% CI 15% to 20%), cigarillos 14% (95% CI 11% to 17%), and snuff 13% (95% CI 10% to 14%). Unique queries increasing the most were 'ryo cigarettes' 427% (95% CI 308% to 534%), 'ryo tobacco' 348% (95% CI 300% to 391%), 'best electronic cigarette' 221% (95% CI 185% to 257%), and 'e-cigarette' 205% (95% CI 163% to 245%). CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 tobacco tax increase triggered large increases in consumer interest for some NTP, particularly e-cigarettes and RYO tobacco. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-cigarette tobacco products; Price; Public policy; Surveillance and monitoring
Authors: Craig R Ramsay; Lloyd Matowe; Roberto Grilli; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Ruth E Thomas Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Andrea S Licht; Andrew J Hyland; Richard J O'Connor; Frank J Chaloupka; Ron Borland; Geoffrey T Fong; Nigar Nargis; K Michael Cummings Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Eric C Leas; Mark Dredze; Rebecca S Williams Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christopher A Drummond; Laura E Crotty Alexander; Steven T Haller; Xiaoming Fan; Jeffrey X Xie; David J Kennedy; Jiang Liu; Yanling Yan; Dawn-Alita Hernandez; Denzil P Mathew; Christopher J Cooper; Joseph I Shapiro; Jiang Tian Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Suzanne M Colby; F Joseph McClernon; Andrew A Strasser; Jennifer W Tidey; Cassidy M White; Eric C Donny Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.018