Literature DB >> 24499755

Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices.

Joelle Aoun1, Virginia A Dines, Dale W Stovall, Mihriye Mete, Casey B Nelson, Veronica Gomez-Lobo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an analysis of intrauterine device (IUD)-related outcomes including expulsion, contraceptive failure, and early discontinuation and to compare these outcomes in regard to age, parity, and IUD type.
METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective chart review of adolescents and women aged 13-35 years who had an IUD inserted for contraception between June 2008 and June 2011.
RESULTS: A total of 2,523 patients' charts were reviewed. Of these, 2,138 patients were included in our analysis. After a mean follow-up of 37±11 months, the overall rates of IUD expulsion and pregnancy were 6% and 1%, respectively, and were not significantly different by age or parity. Intrauterine device discontinuation rates were 19% at 12 months and 41% after a mean follow-up of 37 months. Despite similar rates of IUD discontinuation between age groups at 12 months of use, teenagers and young women aged 13-19 years were more likely to request early discontinuation at the end of the total follow-up period. No significant difference was noted in pelvic inflammatory disease rates (2%) based on age. After adjusting for age and parity, we found that copper IUD users were more likely to experience expulsion and contraception failure compared with levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (hazard ratios 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.50 and hazard ratios 4.89, 95% CI 2.02-11.80, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Similar to adults, IUD use in adolescents and nulliparous women is effective and associated with low rates of serious complications. Health practitioners should therefore consider IUDs for contraception in all females. Teenagers and young women are more likely to request premature discontinuation of their IUDs and may benefit from additional counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24499755     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  19 in total

1.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

2.  Continuation of copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sharon J Phillips; Lisa G Hofler; Anna M Modest; Lara F B Harvey; Lily H Wu; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  "Just Wear Dark Underpants Mainly": Learning from Adolescents' and Young Adults' Experiences with Early Discontinuation of the Contraceptive Implant.

Authors:  Britt Lunde; Lisa Littman; Samantha Stimmel; Rima Rana; Adam Jacobs; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 5.  The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Halley E M Riley; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.

Authors:  Anita Ravi; Linda Prine; Eve Waltermaurer; Natasha Miller; Susan E Rubin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  Discontinuation rates and acceptability during 1 year of using the intrauterine ball (the SCu380A).

Authors:  Ellen Wiebe; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens?

Authors:  Feyza Nur İncesu Çintesun; Ersin Çintesun; Ümmügülsüm Esenkaya; Oğuzhan Günenc
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 9.  Ultrasonography of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Kristina M Nowitzki; Matthew L Hoimes; Byron Chen; Larry Z Zheng; Young H Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-04-01

10.  Knowledge and attitudes of Latin American obstetricians and gynecologists regarding intrauterine contraceptives.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Maria Y Makuch; Ilza Monteiro; Victor Marin; Richard Lynen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.