| Literature DB >> 24496111 |
Hosung Nam1, Louis M Goldstein2, Sara Giulivi3, Andrea G Levitt4, D H Whalen5.
Abstract
There is a tendency for spoken consonant-vowel (CV) syllables, in babbling in particular, to show preferred combinations: labial consonants with central vowels, alveolars with front, and velars with back. This pattern was first described by MacNeilage and Davis, who found the evidence compatible with their "frame-then-content" (F/C) model. F/C postulates that CV syllables in babbling are produced with no control of the tongue (and therefore effectively random tongue positions) but systematic oscillation of the jaw. Articulatory Phonology (AP; Browman & Goldstein) predicts that CV preferences will depend on the degree of synergy of tongue movements for the C and V. We present computational modeling of both accounts using articulatory synthesis. Simulations found better correlations between patterns in babbling and the AP account than with the F/C model. These results indicate that the underlying assumptions of the F/C model are not supported and that the AP account provides a better and account with broader coverage by showing that articulatory synergies influence all CV syllables, not just the most common ones.Entities:
Keywords: CASY; CV preference; TADA; articulatory phonology; babbling; computational simulation; frame-content model
Year: 2013 PMID: 24496111 PMCID: PMC3564651 DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phon ISSN: 0095-4470