Ineke Rixt Postma1, Anke Bouma2, Iefke Froukje Ankersmit2, Gerda Geertruida Zeeman1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Women who suffered preeclampsia and eclampsia may report subjective cognitive difficulties in daily life, the interpretation of which is cumbersome, because these are affected by emotional factors. Previous studies only included preeclamptic women investigated shortly after pregnancy. We aimed to determine whether these subjective reports of cognitive difficulty could be interpreted as reflecting objective cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, cognitive functioning was assessed using standardized neurocognitive tests in both preeclamptic and eclamptic women several years following the index pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six formerly eclamptic, 51 formerly preeclamptic, and 48 control women who had normotensive pregnancies, age-matched, participated in this study. Average elapsed time since index pregnancy was 7 years. Neurocognitive tests were divided into 6 domains; visual perception, motor functions, working memory, long-term memory, attention, and executive functioning. Subjective cognitive functioning was measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire and anxiety/depression by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Both preeclamptic and eclamptic women performed worse on the motor functions domain (P < .05), without differences on the other domains. They scored worse on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (P < .01), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety (P < .01), and depression (P < .05) subscales. CONCLUSION: Women who suffered eclampsia and/or preeclampsia demonstrate no objective cognitive impairment as compared with controls. Contrary to the well-structured test setting, both groups do report more cognitive failures, which are thought to reflect neurocognitive dysfunction in complex, stressful daily-life situations. Such report of cognitive failures may be compounded by anxiety and depression. Future studies should focus on the relationship of neurocognitive functioning with structural cerebral abnormalities.
OBJECTIVE:Women who suffered preeclampsia and eclampsia may report subjective cognitive difficulties in daily life, the interpretation of which is cumbersome, because these are affected by emotional factors. Previous studies only included preeclamptic women investigated shortly after pregnancy. We aimed to determine whether these subjective reports of cognitive difficulty could be interpreted as reflecting objective cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, cognitive functioning was assessed using standardized neurocognitive tests in both preeclamptic and eclamptic women several years following the index pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six formerly eclamptic, 51 formerly preeclamptic, and 48 control women who had normotensive pregnancies, age-matched, participated in this study. Average elapsed time since index pregnancy was 7 years. Neurocognitive tests were divided into 6 domains; visual perception, motor functions, working memory, long-term memory, attention, and executive functioning. Subjective cognitive functioning was measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire and anxiety/depression by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Both preeclamptic and eclamptic women performed worse on the motor functions domain (P < .05), without differences on the other domains. They scored worse on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (P < .01), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety (P < .01), and depression (P < .05) subscales. CONCLUSION:Women who suffered eclampsia and/or preeclampsia demonstrate no objective cognitive impairment as compared with controls. Contrary to the well-structured test setting, both groups do report more cognitive failures, which are thought to reflect neurocognitive dysfunction in complex, stressful daily-life situations. Such report of cognitive failures may be compounded by anxiety and depression. Future studies should focus on the relationship of neurocognitive functioning with structural cerebral abnormalities.
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Natasa M Milic; Tracey L Weissgerber; Wendy M White; Kejal Kantarci; Thomas H Mosley; B Gwen Windham; Brittany N Simpson; Stephen T Turner; Vesna D Garovic Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-02
Authors: Julie A Fields; Vesna D Garovic; Michelle M Mielke; Kejal Kantarci; Muthuvel Jayachandran; Wendy M White; Alissa M Butts; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Brian D Lahr; Kent R Bailey; Virginia M Miller Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rebecca A Nebel; Neelum T Aggarwal; Lisa L Barnes; Aimee Gallagher; Jill M Goldstein; Kejal Kantarci; Monica P Mallampalli; Elizabeth C Mormino; Laura Scott; Wai Haung Yu; Pauline M Maki; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Maria C Adank; Rowina F Hussainali; Lise C Oosterveer; M Arfan Ikram; Eric A P Steegers; Eliza C Miller; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 9.910